Derpetual is the future https://x.com/IPALAU1/status/2118697522743177455?a=heL3MMzQx1oIgHJK1-8&s=20
🔥5❤3
Signed MAGIC

Channel
@dolgommagic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,127subscribers
+258 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001601240797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dolgommagic |
| Description | 코린이를 위한 코인, NFT, 디파이, 화이트리스트, 에어드랍 등 정보 확 공유 공지방 : https://t.me/dolgommagic 채팅방 : https://t.me/dolgomagic 트위터 : https://x.com/ipalau1 유튜브 : https://youtube.com/@dolgombae 관리자 : @babibabo4, @IPALAU 문의 : [email protected] |
| Created | 10 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dolgommagic |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:37 | 12,127 | -6 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:21 | 12,133 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:46 | 12,136 | -8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:28 | 12,144 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:55 | 12,153 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:58 | 12,158 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:59 | 12,162 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 12,161 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:54 | 12,168 | +8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:11 | 12,160 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 12,173 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:51 | 12,174 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 12,177 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 12,181 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 12,191 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 12,193 | +70 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 12,123 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 12,128 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 12,127 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 12,132 | first reading |
159 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 66 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 159 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 49,007 |
| Reactions total | 267 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 19:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
672 reactions across 148 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 595 | 88.5% | |
| 🔥 | 68 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 1.34% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 153 of the 159 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 695 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 159 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 69 posts held from the last 30 days (1.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Derpetual is the future https://x.com/IPALAU1/status/2118697522743177455?a=heL3MMzQx1oIgHJK1-8&s=20
🔥5❤3
Signed MAGIC
RISEx x DOKDO 한국 전용 이벤트 종료 이번 이벤트 최종 보상은 상금 66,000 USDT + RISEx 포인트 8,400점이네요 최종 순위 확인하기 대략 상위 70분에게 상금과 포인트가 분배될거 같네요. 입상 하신분들 축하드립니다
❤2
Signed MAGIC
러시아 중앙은행, 개인 투자자의 비트코인(BTC)·이더리움(ETH)·테더(USDT) 거래 허용 SOURCE
❤3
Signed MAGIC
나스닥 폭락을 조롱하는 코인충 그리고 이에 반격하는 주식쟁이 https://x.com/painkillerbill/status/2118451332021674188?a=GYlWjw5OuTFlxVE3GtQ&s=20
❤2
Signed MAGIC
곧 TGE 예정인 GenLayer 스테이킹 오픈 GenLayer가 메인넷 출시를 앞두고 Pre-Mainnet Staking 프로그램을 공개했네요 Pre-Mainnet Staking 주요 내용 - TGE부터 메인넷 출시 전까지 진행 - TGE때 미클레임 시 자동 스테이킹 처리 - $GEN 1개당 매일 1 포인트씩 적립 - 리더보드 순위로 메인넷 노드 배정 👉 GenLayer 보러가기 $GEN 스테이킹을 통해 포인트를 쌓고 리더보드 순위에 따라 메인넷 벨리데이터 참여 기회를 제공하는 구조입니다 #KOL
❤5
Signed MAGIC
일론 머스크 의문의 트윗 이건 무슨 드립이여 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2118628232002158682?a=TVJyzMCFnKeBNA6G3JY&s=46
❤4
Signed MAGIC
Ondo Perps, 부스트 이벤트 종료 및 OPENAI 가격 예측 이벤트 진행 부스트 이벤트 조기종료 - 11월 11일까지 진행 예정이던 부스트 이벤트는 참여율이 높아서 11/5 오전 2시(KST)에 조기 종료됐습니다 OPENAI 가격 예측 이벤트 - 마감: 11/12(목) 저녁 7시 KST - 내용: OPENAI Pre-IPO 가격 맞히기 - 기준: 11/12 저녁 7시 1분봉 시가 - 보상: 1등 200 / 2~3등 각 100 / 4~5등 각 50 USDC 참여 방법 1️⃣ OndoPerps X 팔로우 2️⃣ 이벤트 트윗 좋아요 + 리트윗 3️⃣ 댓글에 예측 가격 작성 현재 진행중인 OPENAI 가격 예측 이벤트는 별도 거래 없이 X로만 참여 가능합니다
❤4
Signed MAGIC
민주당 블루웨이브가 미치는 크립토 영향? 민주당 상원 의원 엘리자베스 워렌이 미국 상원 은행위원회 차기 의장으로 예측되고 있음. 워렌은 암호화폐 비판가 포지션이며 클레리티의 최대 적수였음. 광범위한 금융 산업 감독, 소화 권한을 "1월"부터 얻게 됨. 그녀가 바로 착수할 것들은 다음과 같음 - 예측 시장 내부자 거래 혐의 조사 - 트럼프 가족 구성원의 부정부패 조사 - 암호화폐 회사 소비자 보호 관행 검토 - 은행과 스테이블 코인 발행 회사간의 이자지급 논쟁검토 하지만 오늘 증시가 3조달러 가까이 날아간 지금 상황에서 이미 위의 사실은 선반영 되어 있다고 보는게 현명할 것 같음. 아래에서 차트로 확인해보기 1. 나스닥100 지수가 순간적 낙폭을 -7% 기록한 반면, 비트코인은 -6%대에서 방어하는 모습을 보였음. 2. 동일 구간에서…
❤6
Signed MAGIC
같은 AI인데 왜 오늘은 멍청할까? — 미라 스털링 같은 모델, 다른 결과 - 같은 AI 모델이라도 실제로 돌려주는 추론 업체는 제각각입니다. 몰래 작은 버전을 돌리거나 툴 호출이 깨지는 곳도 있는데, 유저 입장에선 모델 이름이 같으니 알아차리기 어렵습니다 - gpt-oss-120b 동일 모델인데 업체별 점수 36.7% ~ 93.3% - 189곳 4개월 추적 → 모델이 바뀐 사례 29~37건 발견 미라의 해답, Sterling - 서빙 업체를 실제 쿼리로 사전 테스트 - 검증 통과한 업체로만 자동 라우팅 - 모델 진위·툴 사용·max_tokens·컨텍스트 길이 등 점수와 근거 전부 공개 - 출시 기념 주요 모델 최대 50% 할인 검증 점수 l 관련 공지 이제는 어떤 AI냐 만큼 어디서 돌리냐도 중요해진거 같네요. 다만 스털링은 누가 …
❤2
Signed MAGIC
서순라길 그곳은 대체… https://x.com/halosunny21/status/2118531907113865552?a=bh0ZCPFpui4x0FrpquQ&s=46
❤2
Signed MAGIC
https://n.news.naver.com/article/011/0004679457 22년 당시 : 미래에셋증권, 하나증권, 현대차증권 등: 신용융자 담보비율을 기존 140%에서 130%로 낮추어 적용했습니다. 신한투자증권: 담보종목 등급(A~C 등급)에 따라 140%였던 비율을 130%~135%로 차등 인하했습니다. 진짜 조금 낮춰주는 수준이라 큰 효과는 없을걸로 예상
❤4
Signed MAGIC
지금 고민 중인 것들. 1)전닉, 지금부터 사야 하나. 2)속슬은 왜 이렇게 빠지지. 인간적으로 반등 한 번은 주지 않으려나 싶은데, 이 소리를 70달러부터 하고 있었음. 3)HYPE도 슬슬 내려오는데 여기서 혼자 올리는 LIT은 뭐지. 미국 거래소 승인 관련해서 뒤에서 뭔가 이야기가 돌고 있나 싶고. 4)하닉 펀비는 존나 맛있겠다는 생각이 듦. ADR이랑 본주 갭도 50%네? 이걸 안 들어가? 근데 막상 갭 먹으러 들어가자니 펀비가 존나 건달임. 5)SPY·QQQ는 내 기준 지금부터도 안 사면 병신존이다 싶음. 6)여기서 포폴 없으면 뒤져야 된다 싶을 정도라, 풀시드 현금인 친구들 붙잡고 30%는 매수 들어가라고 존나 얘기하고 있음.
❤4👍2
Signed MAGIC
Showing the 12 most recent of 159 posts we hold for @dolgommagic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@dolgommagic edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dolgommagic named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“돌곰배와 매직 코인일기” (@dolgommagic), 12,127 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dolgommagic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.