Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 크립토 꿀쥐🐭

Channel

크립토 꿀쥐🐭

@honeymouse1003

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,586subscribers

-533 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001554974037
TypeChannel
Username@honeymouse1003
DescriptionNFT,IDO,MetaVerse 해외 및 국내 코인정보의 모든 것 누구보다 빠르게 올려드리겠습니다. “이건 제 개인 의견일 뿐, 투자 판단은 본인 책임입니다이라는것 꼭 명심해주세요!!” 문의 : @rndkqkd13 (꿀쥐) : @slowstudyclub (마이너피) 꿀쥐채널 official link https://linktr.ee/honeyrat
Created6 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/honeymouse1003

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,58612,11911,852.57 August 2026 — 12,119 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,109 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,100 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,093 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,092 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,086 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,078 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,074 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,058 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,052 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,048 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,043 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,032 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,019 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,017 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,003 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,995 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,994 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,981 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,977 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,976 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,961 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,954 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,945 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,932 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,914 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,906 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,898 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,889 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,874 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,824 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,774 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,737 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,724 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,712 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,699 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,696 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,694 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,693 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,685 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,678 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,662 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,659 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,647 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,650 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,647 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,641 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,633 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,624 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,618 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,611 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,607 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,605 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,599 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,596 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,595 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,586 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 92 days, net -533. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,506–12,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 00:3611,586-9
5 Nov 2026, 22:1611,595-1
4 Nov 2026, 22:3011,596-3
3 Nov 2026, 19:5011,599-6
2 Nov 2026, 18:2411,605-2
1 Nov 2026, 19:1811,607-4
31 Oct 2026, 19:5611,611-7
30 Oct 2026, 18:1711,618-6
29 Oct 2026, 16:1511,624-9
28 Oct 2026, 14:0611,633-8
27 Oct 2026, 15:4611,641-6
26 Oct 2026, 14:3811,647-3
25 Oct 2026, 14:1611,650+3
24 Oct 2026, 15:5511,647-12
23 Oct 2026, 13:4911,659-3
22 Oct 2026, 11:5811,662-16
21 Oct 2026, 03:3511,678-7
19 Oct 2026, 22:2811,685-8
18 Oct 2026, 21:4011,693-1
17 Oct 2026, 22:3711,694first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.99%
avg views ÷ 11,586 subscribers
Avg views / post
810
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.267%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held71 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total15,388
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈10,000
Videos
≈404
Links
≈7,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 49 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8786.1%
👍98.91%
🔥32.97%
🍓10.99%
🤪10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (42.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:13 UTC388 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

슬롭캐쉬 1분남았네용 https://app.umia.finance/p/slop-cash/auction

❤1

Signed 꿀 쥐

5 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC260 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @investmenttechPhoto

KAST는 토큰도 안 내고 유저를 기망하는 반면, TRIA는 꾸준히 플랫폼 업데이트가 이뤄지고 있고, 실사용 면에서는 CEX 카드를 빼면 가장 사용성이 좋다고 생각합니다. CEX 카드도 좋긴 하지만 어느 정도 예치 장벽이 있고, 이더파이(EtherFi)도 좋지만 이것저것 다 따져서 계산해 보면 TRIA가 훨씬 낫습니다. 지난번 포켓몬 가챠가 나왔을 때 얼리 액세스 승인을 받아서 전체 랭킹 4위를 하긴 했는데, 그때 확률이 너무 별로여서 한마디 했더니 이번에는 좀 더 개선해서 출시했다고 합니다. 곧 다시 카드깡을 해볼 건데, 이번엔 좋은 게 나오겠죠? 이번에는 퍼블릭 오픈이라 누구나 참여할 수 있습니다. 지금은 트리아 월렛으로 참여하면 1% 캐시백을 받을 수 있고, 트리아 카드도 곧 오픈할 예정인데 그렇게 되면 6% 캐시백으로 가챠를 할…

❤1

Signed 꿀 쥐

5 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC296 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

📢 같은 AI 모델인데 왜 성능이 이렇게 갈릴까? 미라 네트워크가 스털링을 내놓은 이유 🧠 같은 모델, 다른 결과? • 같은 AI 모델을 쓰더라도 어떤 제공업체를 통하느냐에 따라 실제 체감 성능이 크게 달라질 수 있습니다. • gpt-oss-120b 벤치마크를 보면, 동일한 모델을 서비스하는 업체들 사이에서 점수가 36.7%부터 93.3%까지 벌어진 사례가 나왔습니다. • 더 큰 문제는 이런 차이를 사용자가 쉽게 알아차리기 어렵다는 점입니다. 모델 이름은 같아도 실제 실행 환경과 성능은 제각각일 수 있기 때문이죠. 🔥 미라 네트워크의 해답, 스털링 • 미라 네트워크는 이 문제를 해결하기 위해 새로운 AI 추론 서비스 ‘스털링(Sterling)’을 출시했습니다. 제공업체를 직접 검증하고, 검증을 통과한 업체를 통해서만 추론 서비스를 제…

Signed 꿀 쥐

4 Nov 2026, 04:57 UTC557 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026

이번 비트코인 급락이 마지막 탑승 기회같은데 롱물량이 미친듯이 쌓이네요 제대로 롱 스퀴징 나오면 진짜 강승부 볼만할듯 누군가 롱을 잡고 우는소리 계속 나오면 그 롱보다 훨씬더 밑에 가격에 잡아야할듯 꿀쥐가 롱잡은가격 밑에서 잡으면 딱맞을듯 ;

❤4

Signed 꿀 쥐

29 Oct 2026, 08:53 UTC889 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @korii_researchPhoto

😕아... 에드 적격 심사 탈락했네요ㅠㅠ https://m-feed.bithumb.com/notice/1655458 요기로 가셔서 적격 심사 한번씩 돌려보세요!!

❤2

Signed 꿀 쥐

27 Oct 2026, 06:47 UTC984 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

아스타 정배열 야무진데 언제갈꺼니 ?

❤2

Signed 꿀 쥐

27 Oct 2026, 06:18 UTC956 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

비상비상 프레딕펀 프리 벨류 1.4b ㅋㅋ 근데 더 비상비상 예전에 작업했던 지갑 뭔지 다찾아봐야함 .. 포멧했음 ;; 바낸링크

❤1

Signed 꿀 쥐

27 Oct 2026, 06:09 UTC395 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @WeCryptoTogetherPhoto

스탠드X 5천불 수수료 나간 지갑 https://standx.com/airdrop 어이가 없네

Signed 꿀 쥐

27 Oct 2026, 06:03 UTC696 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Umia 에서 느좋 런치패드 하네요 Slop Cash AI가 코드를 너무 많이 쏟아내서 오픈소스 유지보수자들이 지쳐가는 문제를 해결하려고 만든 “실제 병합된 코드에만 돈 주는” 오픈소스 펀딩 시스템입니다. 토큰 $SLOP는 이 시스템의 재무를 관리하는 역할만 합니다. 쉽게말해 기존 방식 (문제되는 방식) “숙제를 제출한 사람 전부에게 용돈 준다” → AI로 아무거나 대충 만들어서 제출만 해도 돈을 받음. → 유지보수자가 쓰레기 숙제를 수백 개 검토해야 해서 지침. Slop Cash 방식 “숙제를 제출해도, 선생님이 실제로 채점해서 받아준 숙제에만 용돈 준다.” → 제출만으로는 돈 안 줌. → 그 프로젝트 담당자가 “이거 괜찮네” 하고 병합(merge) 해줘야 점수와 돈이 들어옴. CTO 가 shaw긴 하네요 Shaw Walters…

❤1

Signed 꿀 쥐

26 Oct 2026, 00:38 UTC480 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @BChoSNPhoto

StandX 에어드랍 체커 뜸 https://standx.com/airdrop TGE 안하고 스테이블로 분배

❤1

Signed 꿀 쥐

19 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,330 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

하루 늦게 했는데도 이득이네 ;; 역대급 돈복사 이벤트였따 ;; 늦게라도 계속 양빵잡으면서 녹일껄 ;; 첫날 만불 녹인 잼민형은 3~4배정도 수익본듯 역대급 혜자 이벤트 트윗글 ㄷㄷ paper 주소

❤3

Signed 꿀 쥐

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @honeymouse1003. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@honeymouse1003 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,355
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,483
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea)
@airdrop_kor · 21,299
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,416
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
🔥요블이 세상살이🔥
@yobeullyANN · 22,274
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,834
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,790
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
DeFi 농부 👨🏻‍🌾 조선생
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,297
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,251
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
30대에 은퇴번복한 머피
@murphybus · 19,932
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
졸업준비위원회🎓
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,695
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 48,940
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,393
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,256
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
코인 갤러리(Coin gallery)
@dogeland01 · 20,934
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,592
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,017
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,731
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“크립토 꿀쥐🐭” (@honeymouse1003), 11,586 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/honeymouse1003.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.