비트겟 거래소 해킹 발생 지난 새벽 그래도 나름 중대형 거래소인 비트겟이 해킹당해 출금 일시 중단이 걸렸는데 일단 피해액 규모는 완전 커버 가능한 수준이고 콜드 월렛이 아닌 핫월렛 일부가 털렸다고 하네요 시장도 크게 반응하지는 않는 것 같습니다
👀5❤2👍1

Channel
@seaotterbtc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,155subscribers
+72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001313067241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seaotterbtc |
| Description | 크립토와 주식 시장을 포함한 자산 시장들의 주관적인 분석, 경제 시황 정보를 공유합니다. (당신의 생각이 옳습니다) 문의 : @god_ty [프리미엄 콘텐츠] https://contents.premium.naver.com/sunmoon/crypto [유튜브] https://youtube.com/@BTCETH |
| Created | 27 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seaotterbtc |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 30,155 | +35 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 30,120 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 30,136 | -13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 30,149 | +36 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 30,113 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 30,117 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 30,115 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:52 | 30,122 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 30,125 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 30,143 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 30,140 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 30,136 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 30,123 | +20 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 30,103 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 30,108 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 30,105 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 30,101 | +23 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 30,078 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 30,073 | +73 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 30,000 | first reading |
238 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 238 (3 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 499,903 |
| Reactions total | 2,137 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 02:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,951 reactions across 223 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,589 | 32.1% | |
| 👍 | 1,525 | 30.8% | |
| 👀 | 996 | 20.1% | |
| 🔥 | 489 | 9.88% | |
| 👏 | 181 | 3.66% | |
| 🐳 | 171 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 238 of the 238 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 238 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seaotterbtc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 238 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 238 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
비트겟 거래소 해킹 발생 지난 새벽 그래도 나름 중대형 거래소인 비트겟이 해킹당해 출금 일시 중단이 걸렸는데 일단 피해액 규모는 완전 커버 가능한 수준이고 콜드 월렛이 아닌 핫월렛 일부가 털렸다고 하네요 시장도 크게 반응하지는 않는 것 같습니다
👀5❤2👍1
상승장이라고해서 조정이 없는 것은 아님 많은 뉴비 투자자들이 착각하는게 [상승장 = 하락이 없다]라고 생각하는데 상승장에서도 급락은 굉장히 빈번하게 발생함 지난 상승장 시즌들을 살펴보면 비트코인 기준 -10% 이상의 하락은 시즌 당 평균 약 14.3회 발생했으며 그 중 -30% 이상 하락은 약 4.3회 발생함 급락이 없기에 상승장이 아니라 급락이 발생해도 회복하는 힘이 강해 새로운 ATH를 만들러 가기에 상승장이라 부르는 것 최근 좀 올랐다고 무리한 레버리지로 추격 매수하기보다는 아직 새로운 시즌 초기에 가까운만큼 주기적으로 나오는 조정에 현물을 매수하는게 기대 수익률과 리스크 측면에서 좋은 선택이 아닐까 지난 시즌들은 시즌 저점부터 고점까지 약 3년 조금 안되게 진행되었는데 지난 6월이 저점이라 가정해도 아직 남아있는 시간은 …
👍22❤12👀3👏1🔥1
비트코인 매매 고수 고래의 현재 대기 오더는? FOMC 전/후 형성된 바닥권에서 정확한 매수에 성공했던 고수 고래는 현재 $82.2K~$78.8K에 새로운 오더 생성 이번에도 잡히나..? #비트코인
👍15👀6❤3🐳3
굉장히 오래걸린 밈멕스 보상 확정 대펍덱의 시대에서 혜자 보상 챙겨줄거라 기대했었는데.. 드디어 클레임 하네요 보상은 $M 토큰으로 3회에 걸쳐 클레임 예정 1차 : 9/30 23:30 2차 : 10/15 3차 : 10/30 롯데월드 대관하는 날 1차 클레임..! ➡트윗원문
❤4👍2👀1
비트코인, 이더리움 ETF 프리미엄은 아직 음수권 유지 ETF 프리미엄이 높다는건 해당 종목에 프리미엄을 지불하면서까지 매수하려는 수요가 높다는 것 (반대로 음수라면 매도 수요가 강한 것) 최근 반등 전 비트코인, 이더리움 ETF 프리미엄이 양수권으로 전환되는 모습을 보였는데 금일 약간의 하락세에도 음수권을 유지 중 저는 단기 상방 베팅은 양수권으로 돌아올 때 까지 기다려볼 생각 #비트코인 #이더리움 #차트
👍12👀5❤4🔥4
비트코인 바닥권에서의 패턴 기술적 분석 메트릭인 200일 이평선과 온체인 분석 메트릭인 단기홀더들의 평단을 모두 돌파 이는 지난 3번의 바닥에서 새로운 상승 싸이클의 시작점임을 알렸던 구간 출처 #비트코인 #차트 #온체인데이터
👍14👀5🔥5❤4👏1
AI, 예측시장이 성장할수록 같이 중요해지는 오라클 최근 CZ가 “오라클은 한두 개로 충분하지 않고 여러 소스가 필요하다”며 온체인 예측시장과 AI가 오라클 수요를 더 키울 것이라고 언급 🤔그럼 밈코인, 소셜 트레이딩에서는? - X에서 퍼지는 루머 - 특정 인플루언서들의 발언 - 상장/파트너십 소식 - 온체인 자금 이동 - 프로젝트 공식 발표 같은 ‘정보와 내러티브’가 가격에 빠르게 반영되는데, 문제는 뉴스가 10개 보여도 원출처는 하나일 수 있고, 실제 사실인지 단순 루머인지 판단하기가 어렵다는 것 Cournot의 Intelligence Oracle Skill은 이런 특정 크립토 이벤트를 질문하면 1. 정확히 어떤 사건을 판단하는지 2. 발생 가능성을 몇 %로 보는지 3. 어떤 근거로 판단했는지 4. 원출처는 어디인지 까지 트레이딩 시…
👀4👏4👍1
현재 역프는 약 -0.6%대 장기간 침체기 이후 상승 싸이클의 초입에 진입하는 시점에는 역프가 형성되었던적이 많았습니다 [4가지 김프, 역프 싸이클] - 상승기 초입 : 역프(구라 반등 안믿어~) - 상승기 후반 : 심한 김프(아직 더간다!!) - 하락기 초입 : 심한 김프(조정에는 매수!!) - 하락기 후반 : 역프(더이상 못버텨 패닉) 단기도 좋지만 현재 시기를 상승기 초입으로의 전환기로 생각하고 중장기적인 뷰를 생각해 봐야할 시점 #차트
👍16❤4👀4🔥2
워뇨띠 매매 내역 공개이후 AI 분석들 위 분석들 교차된 핵심 내용들만 요약 워뇨띠 매매 핵심 — 6개 글 교차 요약 1) 풀베팅 안 함 → 항상 분할 진입·분할 청산 2) 포지션을 계속 조절 → 오르면 증액, 반대로 가도 소량 추가 3) 물타기는 하지만 마틴게일 X → 작은 비중으로 평균단가 조절 4) 롱,숏 전환이 매우 적극적 → 방향이 바뀌면 미련 없이 포지션 전환 5) 손실 후 복수매매 X → 손실이 커질수록 오히려 포지션 관리 6) 고정된 지표 하나에 의존 X → 가격·거래량·패턴·지지저항 등 종합 판단 7) 결국 핵심은 타점보다 리스크 관리 → 계좌를 살려놓고 계속 기회를 잡는 구조 한 줄 요약 “맞히는 매매”보다 작게 진입 → 상황 확인 → 비중 조절 → 필요하면 반대 전환 → 분할청산 을 반복하는 매매. #워뇨띠
👍22❤9🐳1👀1
비트코인 현물 ETF 거래자들의 평단 깔끔히 돌파 미국 비트코인 현물 ETF 출시 이후 거래자들의 평단은 유의미한 지지/저항으로 작용했기에... * 물려있다 본전 = 본절 탈출 매도세 발생 가능 * 수익보다 본전 = 추가 매수세 유입 가능 이렇게 빨리 돌파할지는 몰랐지만 저항을 뜷고 상승 추세로 전환 이제 ETF 거래자들의 평단 부근은 강한 지지라인으로 작용할 수 있습니다 (현재 평단 약 $82.2K) 주 봉 50일선 저항도 돌파 마감했고.. 앞으로 수개월이 대불장을 준비하기 가성비 좋은 시기라 생각되네요 다들 이번 시즌에는 대부자 되시길 #비트코인 #차트
❤29🔥4🐳3👏2
짐 크레이머, 8월 초 비트코인 전량 매도 현재 BTC가 상승하면서 커뮤니티에선 또다시 ‘역크레이머’ 밈 등장. 전인구 느낌 ㅋㅋ (그의 희생을 잊지말자는 이야기가 나오는 이유)
👍21🔥7👀4
최근 이더리움 ETF 프리미엄이 강하게 붙었던 구간은 ETF 프리미엄이 높다는건 해당 종목에 프리미엄을 지불하면서까지 매수하려는 수요가 높다는 것 (반대로 음수라면 매도 수요가 강한 것) 이번에도 큰 강세를 보이기 전 마지막 바닥권을 말해주었음 ETF 프리미엄 메트릭은 스윙 투자에서 매수 시점을 잡는데 매우 큰 도움을 주는 중 현재는 역프로 돌아왔습니다 #이더리움 #차트
❤16👍4🔥3🐳1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 238 posts we hold for @seaotterbtc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@seaotterbtc edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 84 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“해달의 투자 정보 공유” (@seaotterbtc), 30,155 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seaotterbtc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.