$ENA 현시점 가장 옳게된 코인 진짜 머 자대고 그린거 같네

Channel
크립토다이어리
@c_ryptodiary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,738subscribers
-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001738204270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @c_ryptodiary |
| Description | * 매일 크립토 공부를 위해 글 포스팅 * 투자 추천을 위한 글 아닙니다 * Web3 리서치 읽는거 짱 좋아함 * 좋은 글 있으면 추천해주세요 중요 연락: @Heykate0 |
| Created | 22 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/c_ryptodiary |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 7,738 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 7,749 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 7,762 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 7,765 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 7,777 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 7,792 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 7,797 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 7,797 | first reading |
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.06%
- avg views ÷ 7,738 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 391
- 38 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.844%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 38
- of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (29 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,870 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,750
- Videos
- ≈139
- Links
- ≈3,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 95.0% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
참고로 ENA의 DAT 회사도 있다는거 아시나요? 나스닥 티커 USDE를 사용하는 스테이블코인X인데 약 30억개 이상의 ENA를 사모았어요. 이번 상승에 ENA가 크게 올라주면서 스테이블코인X도 바닥가 대비 약 4배 상승 중
📈ENA 상승률 1등 흑인은 ENA 여기서 5배 간다고 실링중ㅋㅋ 흑인은 이더, 이더나, 이더파이 맛있게 먹는즁이고 불장에 맞춰 플젝 론칭까지 ㄹㅈㄷ잘하네... https://x.com/cryptohayes/status/2090558888215191669?s=46&t=qOnvDqeaAu-hDp7imiVLNQ
🟢 $72,000 @bitcoin_price
정부 "개인지갑 보관 가상자산도 과세 대상" https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42551
크립토 백악관 회동 주요 발언
방미심위, '사행성 논란' 폴리마켓 접속차단 의결
시드구문은 집에만 꽁쳐놓기.. https://x.com/pritipatelfgoo/status/2089227487587013004?s=20
코인과세는 1400만명의 표심을 잃고, 세수는 오히려 줄이는 과세정책입니다. 국민동의청원 링크는 여기로
CCT가 11분만 투자하면 좋을 전신 운동 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-Jd4kI6rdM
지난 5년간 크립토 VS 미국 주요 주식 성과
✔️부산TP '부산 블록체인 허브' 입주기업 모집 - 모집기한: 8월 18일까지 - 모집규모: 총 7개실 - 지원기간: 최대 3년 - 대상: 블록체인 관련 중소기업 - 자격요건: 본점 또는 지사가 부산에 소재한 기업 - 제외대상: 가상자산 발행·투자 등을 주된 사업으로 하는 기업 부산 블록체인 허브에 입주할 기업을 모집한다하는군요 출처
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @c_ryptodiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 198,121 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@shrimp_notice · 29,1004 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 24,9353 posts폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,2712 posts코인소년의 크립토 이야기 🙋♂️🦅
@coinboys · 15,4602 postsCOINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 31,1092 postsbite the bullet
@bitethebulletkr · 9,0311 postSteve’s Catallaxy
@catallactic · 5,2111 post[NEWS] 디지털애셋
@digitalassetnewsroom · 1,9801 post취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 50,3691 post불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 33,4551 postZi존파워잼민
@jammin0720 · 3,5471 post레오의 AI/코딩/트레이딩/아비트라지
@leo_autotrading · 1,1441 post잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 26,2931 post해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,1231 post슬기로운 HODL생활
@SOLful_hodl_life · 1,7681 post서초동 투자머신
@twomachine · 5,3551 post빚쟁이는 여의도로
@yeouidobi · 1,9561 post나백이의 코인라이프
@ysytop2 · 10,0161 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“크립토다이어리” (@c_ryptodiary), 7,738 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c_ryptodiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.