비트코인, 바이낸스 해킹 발생 당시 가격 상회 $BTC
❤2

Channel
@ysytop2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,439subscribers
+3,184 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001701554232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ysytop2 |
| Description | X : https://x.com/Naback222 Chat TG : https://t.me/ysytop22 IDO/ICO/NFT/Airdrop 등등 무지성 참여 ⚡️DM : Naback222 (문의) 이벤트 참여는 본인 선택입니다. 질문이나 기타 내용은 토론방에서 부탁합니다. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ysytop2 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:21 | 10,439 | -24 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:40 | 10,463 | -27 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:39 | 10,490 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:28 | 10,500 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:45 | 10,509 | -9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 10,518 | -1,711 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 12,229 | -513 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 12,742 | -31 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 12,773 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 12,788 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:11 | 12,805 | -15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 12,820 | -439 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 13,259 | -29 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:45 | 13,288 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 13,301 | +4,353 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 8,948 | -31 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:34 | 8,979 | -41 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 9,020 | -80 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:41 | 9,100 | -273 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 9,373 | first reading |
193 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 193 (3 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 13,038 |
| Reactions total | 33 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 20:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 117 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 175 | 93.1% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.13% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.532% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.532% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 193 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (11.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
비트코인, 바이낸스 해킹 발생 당시 가격 상회 $BTC
❤2
군대 기강 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 한숨만 나온다... 해병대도 옛날에야 해병대지.. 존중받아야하지만. 저런애들은 그냥 스펙 쌓을려는 정신병자들인건가...ㅡㅡ
❤1
거제 비비탄 해병대 실형 8개월 강아지한테 불법 개조 비비탄 난사한 해병대들 징역 8개월 나옴, 반려견 3마리 중 2마리 죽었고 한 마리는 실명 영상보면 개도라이 https://youtu.be/oCnO0hhSOB0?si=jpujk1g6Pia1oSOZ
재경부, 매일경제 “해외 코인계좌서 美주식 선물투자땐 과세” 보도내용 사실 아냐 원문 해외 가상자산거래소에서 거래되는 상품에 대한 과세 여부 및 방식에 대해서는 정해진 바 없다. #과세
❤3😱1
🤕 Four meme Korea 커뮤니티 오픈기념 이벤트 바이낸스의 자식 FOURMEME에서 한국 공식 텔레그램 커뮤니티가 오픈되었네요. 오픈 기념으로 커피 뿌리고 있으니, 간단하게 미션참여하고 에어드랍 받으셈 ✅한국 커뮤니티 이벤트 - 상품 : 커피 200명 / 치킨 50명 - 기간 : 10/25~11/10 - 참여조건 (필수) - four.meme 한국 텔방 입장 - four.meme 트위터 팔로우 -구글폼 접수하기 ✅ 선택 미션 1. four.meme 홈페이지 둘러보기 2. four.meme 인스타그램 팔로우 🚫 참고 사항 - 커뮤니티에서 적극적으로 채팅 하시는분들은 당첨 확률이 높다고하네요 - 선택 미션 진행 시, 당첨 확률 상승
❤2
미 중간선거, 민주당 상원 승리 확률 75% 육박 #중간선거
❤2🥰1
미국 중간선거, 민주당 양원 탈환 우세 전망 ▸ Kalshi (11월 2일): 하원 민주 94%, 상원 민주 74% ▸ Polymarket: 하원 95%, 상원 74% ⌖ 모델의 상원 확률은 64~78%로 갈리는 중 🗂 미 중간선거 한국 시간 기준 ▸ 11/4(수) 08:00 인디애나·켄터키(대부분) ↳ 밤의 첫 마감, 켄터키 상원 매코널 은퇴 오픈 시트 ▸ 11/4(수) 09:00 조지아·버지니아·사우스캐롤라이나·플로리다 대부분·인디애나/켄터키 잔여 ↳ 조지아 상원 오소프 재선 방어전이 첫 시험대 ▸ 11/4(수) 09:30 노스캐롤라이나·오하이오·웨스트버지니아 ↳ 노스캐롤라이나 상원 오픈 시트 최대 뒤집기 후보, 오하이오 상원 특별선거 ▸ 11/4(수) 10:00 메인·미시간·텍사스·펜실베이니아·일리노이·캔자스 등 20여 개 주(대부…
❤2
국내 가상자산 과세 연기 딜레이, 해외 거래소 주식 무기한 선물 수익에 11% 과세 추진 #과세
❤2
11월 2일 SEC 기업금융국, 크립토 FAQ에 추가한 문답 정리 ▸거버넌스 참여자 다수는 중앙 주체 그룹이 아니다 ▸접근을 일방적으로 통제하면 참여적 감독 ▸기능성과 탈중앙화는 다른 개념 ↳ 단, 스태프 견해라 법적 효력은 없습니다 #SEC
북한, 바이낸스 해킹 배후라는 주장이 "조작"이라고 주장
🥰1
SPX 기준 11월은 가장 성과가 좋은 달 #경제
❤2
🗳 미국 중간선거 당일, 서울에서 미스터리 에어드랍 파티 11/3(화) 저녁 7–9시, 미국이 투표를 시작하는 밤 NewSight Labs가 『트럼프는 투표용지에 없다』 출간회를 엽니다. 🎁 체크인한 전원에게 비밀의 코인 에어드랍 🧠 퀴즈 정답자 $00+ 코인 추가 지급 💎 ??코인 최다 홀더 현장 보너스 👀 스폰서·코인은 행사 하루 전 공개 📚 사인본 30부 한정: 15 USDT 이상, 예약자 입장·좌석 우선 🙏 수익 전액 2027 서울 세계청년대회(WYD) 기부 🍸 무료 입장 + 웰컴 드링크, 승인제 📍 장소는 승인자에게만 안내 👉 신청: https://luma.com/xu7h5n3l
🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 193 posts we hold for @ysytop2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 2 posts on @ysytop2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“나백이의 코인라이프” (@ysytop2), 10,439 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ysytop2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.