🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

Channel
나백이의 코인라이프
@ysytop2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,603subscribers
+2,348 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001701554232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ysytop2 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ysytop2 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 9,603 | -121 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 9,724 | -90 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 9,814 | -105 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 9,919 | -72 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 9,991 | -25 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 10,016 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 10,031 | +2,876 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 7,155 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 7,159 | -21 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 7,180 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 7,202 | -29 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 7,231 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 7,252 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 7,255 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 7,255 | first reading |
Engagement
176 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.1%
- avg views ÷ 9,603 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 970
- 99 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.127%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 99
- of 176 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 50 of 99 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 176 (3 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 96,012 |
| Reactions total | 67 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 25s
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
155 reactions across 102 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 149 | 96.1% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.94% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.29% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.645% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 176 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 176 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
해결하고 있다며 트럼프와 통화를 연상케 하는 사진도 사라짐 ;;
❤1
해킹 가능성이 크다는 의견이 많네요
오전 가장 큰 이슈, 트럼프 관련 코인라 추측됐던 $GOLD 급락 코인 관련 글은 삭제됐고 '트럼프 오가니제이션의 공식 파트너' 계정은 해당 문제를 해결하고 있다며 투자자들에게 기다려달라는 트윗이 올라옴
2025년 1월 이후 해킹피해 규모 $3.63B - 총 발생한 사건 245곤 - 2025년에는 거래소, 2026년에는 프로토콜 및 인프라가 주된 타켓 - 245건 중 147건이 감사를 받은 프로토콜 > 실제 감사 범위 내 결함이 관련된 경우 11%
비트코인 & 금 상관관계 지수 역대 최고치 기록 $BTC
❤3
국내 리테일 리스크 심리 최근 한국 리테일 리스크 심리가 빠르게 급등 후 소강상태 > 이 수치는 여전히 50% 과열 구간 아래에 머물러 있으므로, 이전 피크에서 보인 극단적인 리스크 테이킹 수준 X
❤1
오늘의 메인 이벤트, 밤 11시 연준의장 잭슨홀 첫 기조연설 오늘 밤 11시(한국 시간) 예정된 케빈 워시 연준 의장의 잭슨홀 첫 기조연설이 향후 시장 방향성을 결정짓는 핵심 변수 ▶읽어보기 좋은 글
❤1
엔화예금 잔액 1조3456억엔 '사상 최대' KB국민·신한·하나·우리·NH농협 등 5대 은행의 엔화예금 잔액은 2024년 ‘수퍼 엔저’ 당시 기록을 넘어 사상 최대를 기록
비트코인, 지난 주 역대 주간 캔들 상승폭 1위 기록 $BTC
❤2
Posted without readable text
❤2
AI를 활용한 역대 인터넷 밈 한번에 보기 #AI
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 176 posts we hold for @ysytop2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@GemHive · 24,1316 posts에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,5615 posts돈독이 바짝 오른 돈독킹
@Dondoking · 332 postsCoinFluencer P2E&NFT
@hjwnews · 6,9842 postsT.A Crypto
@yul_papa · 8,1502 postsAceB, 호미의 에어드랍 한입만요
@aceb10b · 3801 postBaro
@BaroView · 2,3871 post아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 12,0621 post크립토다이어리
@c_ryptodiary · 7,6171 post코백남 공지방
@cobacknamannounce · 18,6261 post007 (NFA)
@CODE007_KR · 1,3551 post크립토 꿀통 허니통 (DinoLabs)
@cryptodino_dino · 3,8171 post크립토스쿨 다오🦅
@CRYPTOSCH00L · 12,6351 post큐브의 유기농 크립토 쌀농장 🦅
@cubestudy1557 · 9,3001 postJerrY Alpha
@jerryalpha · 7,4111 post크립토 원정대
@legoleecm777 · 7,1691 post레오마스터‘s 코인 공지채널
@leomasternotice · 5691 post생계형 에어드랍
@sangp_airdrop · 1,4391 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Bounty_ATM · 25,561
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“나백이의 코인라이프” (@ysytop2), 9,603 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ysytop2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.