러시아, 자국민에게 이란 여행 자제 권고

Channel
차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,111subscribers
-402 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001250181792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chavoonnam |
| Description | 코인시황 및 차트분석 또는 이슈를 공유하는 텔레그램 채널입니다. ▶️[모든문의] @Chavoon_nam ▶️[공식 인스타그램] https://www.instagram.com/chavoonnam |
| Created | 22 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chavoonnam |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:49 | 21,111 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:45 | 21,112 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:36 | 21,116 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:19 | 21,121 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:06 | 21,127 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 21,138 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:11 | 21,134 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 21,143 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 21,153 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 21,154 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:50 | 21,160 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 21,168 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:17 | 21,165 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 21,175 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 21,183 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:47 | 21,188 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 21,190 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 21,202 | -1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:39 | 21,203 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 21,206 | first reading |
Engagement
520 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.2%
- avg views ÷ 21,111 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,160
- 98 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.453%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 98
- of 520 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 91 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 520 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 211,350 |
| Reactions total | 920 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈21,900
- Videos
- ≈110
- Links
- ≈12,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 52s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,739 reactions across 476 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3,428 | 50.9% | |
| ❤ | 3,002 | 44.5% | |
| 🔥 | 309 | 4.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 498 of the 520 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,954 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 520 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 98 posts held from the last 30 days (2.04%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
미국 혼조세 출발
속슬 근황
❤8👍2
현재 포지션
- 롱47%
- 숏24%
- 관망32%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
중간선거 결과는 모호하지 않았습니다. 결과는 명확했고, 트럼프는 이를 받아들였습니다. 제 관점에서 보면, 비트코인 시장이 여전히 충분한 축적 시간을 필요로 한다고 믿는 사람으로서, 만약 마켓 메이커들이 중간선거를 촉매로 사용할 계획이었다면, 비트코인 가격의 급락이 실제로 더 나았을 거라고 생각합니다. 왜일까요? 시장에서는 이미 중간선거에서 어느 정당이 이기느냐에 따라 비트코인이 어떻게 반응해야 하는지에 대한 명확한 내러티브가 확립되어 있었기 때문입니다. 만약 비트코인이 그 내러티브에 맞춰 급락했다면, 투자자 심리를 빠르게 흔들어 시장 바닥을 찾는 과정을 가속화할 수 있었을 것입니다. 하지만 대신, 비트코인이 여전히 불확실한 가격 범위에 갇혀 있는 동안 단기 강세 기대가 다시 쌓이고 있습니다. 이것이 오히려 상황을 더 복잡하게 만들 …
❤5👍2
💡💡💡💡💡💡 영국 중앙은행(BOE)이 기준금리를 25bp 인상해 4.00%로 결정. 2023년 이후 첫 금리 인상. 금리 인상 결정은 8대 1로 통과됐으며, 캐서린 만 위원은 50bp 인상을 주장. 시장 예상 표결 결과는 7대 2. 앤드루 베일리 영국 중앙은행 총재는 “중동 분쟁이 해결되지 않는 한 이번 금리 인상이 마지막이 될 가능성은 낮아 보입니다”라고 발언.
👍3
살아나는 프랑스 증시.. 유럽증시 대체로 분위기 좋음 영국, 독일 신고가
❤7👍3
📣 가상자산 과세 2년 유예 확정되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 보도, 참고자료 코인과세가 2년 공식 유예되었습니다. 여당, 야당 모두 당대표가 공식 건의하고 행정부까지 동의했습니다. 세법개정안 개정은 확정이고 연말 표결만 거치면 됩니다. 2년 유예와 함께, 3년간의 손실 이월공제도 재정경제부 발표에 포함되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 부총리 브리핑 자료 원문보러가기 정말 수고 많으셨습니다.
❤19👍4
국내증시 및 나스닥 선물 낙폭 확대
❤5👍1
유가 지속 하락세
❤2👍1
국내
❤4🔥3👍2
🇺🇸 민주당 상하원 장악 첫날, AI 금지 촉구 출처
Showing the 12 most recent of 520 posts we hold for @chavoonnam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
현재 포지션
- 롱47%
- 숏24%
- 관망32%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
중간선거 있는 이번주
- 상승41%
- 하락42%
- 모름19%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
비트코인
- 상승장 시작60%
- 여전히 하락장42%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 520 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@crypto_alert_kr · 175 posts마이티불스 (Mightybulls)
@mightybulls_official · 2,2233 posts꿀찾는 양말이 Super N 크립토 일기장 ⚡️
@Honeyofwhitesocks_2 · 11,1202 posts쉬러감청소년
@Iwanttogohome09 · 6,1212 posts더프로시그널🫡
@TheProCoin · 5452 posts에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,8491 post구 징어
@DJQOO2 · 31 post코챌스&코봉이의 뉴스 채널
@Kobongi · 1301 post옹살랜드
@OngsalYee · 6,1651 postSOJANG COIN NEWS
@SOJANG_signal · 3321 postST Asian Parser
@asian_parser · 1,6051 post비트웨일
@bitwhalelv1 · 1,3011 postAger
@chart_ist00 · 3461 post코백남 공지방
@cobacknamannounce · 17,0851 post코인긍정론자의 정보방 - 비트코인/알트코인/경제/시사/이슈
@coinpositivist · 321 post코인광장(coinsquare)
@coinsquarelw · 1,1911 post트레이딩 관점 공유하는 방
@crypto_nasdaq_trading · 761 post크립토 꿀통 허니통 (DinoLabs)
@cryptodino_dino · 8,9591 post디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 12,8991 postD&C Ventures↗️ 공지 (旧 D's Room)
@dsroomjewel · 5711 post이편한코인 채널❤️
@ebtcoin2 · 1511 postFOMO 4가투
@fourgachi · 9,3851 post귀극기의 코인정보 공유채널
@gaduricoin · 5031 post미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 73,7931 post에어드랍 정보 공유 (워렌존버핏)
@jonbuffit · 5561 postBTC/SOL Ai&Meme 생태찌개 조리실
@kaicrypto1 · 1211 post기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,2461 post너쟁이의 성실한 추추생활
@nje2e · 8,9561 postSally's law
@sallyslaw79 · 1421 post해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,0251 post타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,9381 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@insidertracking · 73,79321 posts김치터미널
@KimchiTerminal · 5,80715 posts카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,03213 postsCTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,14310 posts해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,0259 postsKK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,1117 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,2855 postsMacro Jungle | micro lens
@Macrojunglemicrolens · 23,0064 posts급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,9783 postsHS아카데미 대표 이효석
@HS_academy · 36,1293 postsCrypto Dan
@dancoininvestor · 4,3513 posts해랑달‘s Takes & Notes
@newmoneymovesio · 5,0993 posts한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 16,6732 posts블록미디어
@blockmedia · 32,9982 posts코인은 사기다 [코사]
@coinsagi · 1,0732 posts디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 12,8992 posts도랏맨
@doratman18 · 9,3982 posts텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,6472 posts📰 실시간 속보 단독 뉴스
@news_kor · 15,5972 posts매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것
@waitstudy · 19,4642 posts64비트사령부⚡️ 🇰🇷🇺🇸
@BTCpentagon · 6,5041 post하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,2771 post[한투 테크팀] 남채민/황준태/김정찬/김연준
@KISemicon · 15,5161 postNew Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,2431 postPlan G Research
@Plan_G_Research · 6,3111 post로우나의 투자방
@Rowna999 · 14,2781 post벨루가의 주식 헤엄치기
@beluga_investment · 7,6261 post루팡
@bornlupin · 49,1821 postcoin500bking
@coin500Bking · 17,5871 post크립토마카세
@cryptomacase · 10,9111 post딘스티커 Dean's Ticker
@d_ticker · 16,0961 post돌찬 공지방
@dolchanchain · 5,6511 post도파민 연구소
@dopamineonchain · 5,3421 post서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,3821 post취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 48,9681 postGALA
@gala9898 · 6,0641 post한국경제
@hankyung_fin · 12,6941 post호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,3461 post쫑이밥그릇팔아알트사기
@jjonge1219 · 2,1161 post박주혁
@juhyukb · 6,5641 post🌸Crypto Judy🐰🌸
@lovejudylee · 42,4811 post㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,4151 post묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,7161 post요약하는 고잉
@one_going · 48,0631 post오스왈드
@oswarld_oz · 1,6051 post새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,3641 post부의길목에서 🦅
@stay_news · 7,6571 posttradfi_kr
@trad_fin_kr · 1,4111 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@enjoymyhobby · 48,968#1
@emperorcoin · 35,647#2
@kkeongsmemo · 10,593#3
@TeamYonseiDent · 8,506#4
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,725#5
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,285#6
@seaotterbtc · 30,025#7
@moneybottle · 15,705#8
@BChoSN · 26,285#9
@Jobless_investor · 5,900#10
@fireant_crypto · 32,710#11
@coinnesskr · 30,472#12
@gensencoin · 14,816#13
@MAC_DDDD · 4,722#14
@cogall1st · 4,019#15
@murphybus · 19,935#16
@dogeland01 · 20,958#17
@TheDisPater · 2,078#18
@coin_1st · 5,499#19
@moon252423 · 4,396#20
@blockmedia · 32,998#21
@xvgwhitedog2 · 15,380#22
@Signal_Quant · 4,617#23
@magonia_b · 26,246#24
@SasukeChart · 8,435 (as read 24 September 2026)#25
@dolbikong · 9,603#26
@dancoininvestor · 4,351#27
@easychartgo · 6,046#28
@kookookoob · 16,530#29
@liambitcoin · 4,528#30
@chikointhebox · 14,598#31
@xangle_official_kr · 12,567#32
@moneygrid · 10,787#33
@BQTelegram · 9,754#34
@shrimp_notice · 28,364#35
@CryptoStreetSignal · 10,411#36
@AISPERSONS · 3,852#37
@ApexFlowpros · 14,009#38
@koreasigna · 3,243#39
@teamctrine · 8,143#40
@colufarmers · 4,354#41
@cryptoquant_kr · 10,195#42
@eastsouthwind · 4,666#43
@coincodekr · 10,215#44
@whalealertkorean · 6,557#45
@FllowYourDreamForsight · 2,611#46
@DOGGODIE_TRADER · 3,431#47
@LEE_OnChain · 1,672#48
@vibetaku · 1,989#49
@cq_alert_kr · 21,648#50
@money0stack9Notice · 7,873#51
@whaleliq · 4,603#52
@lnsanecoin · 8,037#53
@allkindchallenge · 4,443#54
@dontak00 · 14,777#55
@realtime_breaking · 15,128#56
@diglett88 · 4,337#57
@marshallog · 21,419#58
@suhopa · 3,123#59
@Bananamilkrich · 8,644#60
@airdr0p_lab · 20,500#61
@sealcryptocvd · 11,174#62
@billair1 · 6,313#63
@mujammin123 · 25,827#64
@tlsrltnf · 22,436#65
@inlyeog · 10,504#66
@yieldnspread · 22,077#67
@mongtanodance · 4,368#68
@yobeullyANN · 22,306#69
@vc_21m · 5,469#70
@twitchoong · 78,515#71
@GDSTofficial · 2,520#72
@vallettaidea · 3,480#73
@CryptoFamily_ilhyun · 14,483 (as read 24 September 2026)#74
@Jenti_DeFi · 1#75
@web3subin · 9,753#76
@Alex_briefing · 2,100#77
@LEEHEESANGDYOR · 9,558#78
@killberosDAO · 14,938#79
@minchoisfuture · 15,415#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@godmulzoo · 21,955
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
@cq_alert_kr · 21,648
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
@coinnesskr · 30,472
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@blockmedia · 32,998
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@dogeland01 · 20,958
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@coinkcgchannel · 15,469
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
@BChoSN · 26,285
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@seaotterbtc · 30,025
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,725
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@emperorcoin · 35,647
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 48,968
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@fireant_crypto · 32,710
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@twitchoong · 78,515
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@toncoin_kr · 23,023
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“차분남(차트분석하는남자)” (@chavoonnam), 21,111 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chavoonnam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.