숏도 완익
👍2

Channel
@ApexFlowpros
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,020subscribers
-1,390 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001314232154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ApexFlowpros |
| Description | 전업 트레이더 Pros를 중심으로 총 4명의 실전 트레이더가 운영하는 크립토 & 미국 주식 트레이딩 채널입니다. 단순한 전망이 아닌, 실제 운용 중인 포지션 공개, 시장 구조 해석, 그리고 철저한 리스크 관리 기반 매매 전략을 공유합니다. 프로스 팀 설명 : https://litt.ly/prostrading ✉️개인문의 - https://t.me/prostradingX |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ApexFlowpros |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 14,020 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:16 | 14,027 | -22 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:35 | 14,049 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:45 | 14,058 | -21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 14,079 | -20 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:05 | 14,099 | -26 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 14,125 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 14,132 | -18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 14,150 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 14,156 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:44 | 14,162 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 14,171 | -19 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:15 | 14,190 | -13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 14,203 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 14,211 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 14,219 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:28 | 14,227 | -12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:38 | 14,239 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 14,244 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:11 | 14,248 | first reading |
42 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (21 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 43,883 |
| Reactions total | 207 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 05:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
440 reactions across 42 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 344 | 78.2% | |
| 👏 | 39 | 8.86% | |
| 👌 | 34 | 7.73% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 5.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 440 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
숏도 완익
👍2
예정대로 비트는 완익~!
👍11
생각보다 빠른 가격 움직임으로 약간은 당황스러운 가운데 매매 계획은 이러함~! 79.4K에서 롱은 전량 익절후 PA를 본후 숏진입을 우선으로 하되 80K를 강하게 돌파한다면 관망할 계획 LTF에서 구조가 어떻게 되는지가 관건~! 상단은 매물대와 월레인지 저항, 하락채널의 중앙선이 겹쳐 돌파가 쉽지 않으나 예상은 금물이니 조심스럽게 접근할 예정~!
👏17
$BTC EQ이탈이 있었고 아직까지 EQ 회복을 못한 상태입니다. EQ이탈이 되면 제 경험상 반등이 나와도 70%확률로 다시 뚫린방향으로 움직이던데 이건 제가 올라도 다시 숏을 보려고 하는 뷰랑도 일치합니다. 파란구간까지는 와줘야한다고 생각을 합니다. 숏포지션 입 벌리고 대기하겠습니다
👍10👌1
2차TP 도달
👌3
모든 조건 만족하여 SFP확인후 롱진입~~! 그리고 반익~! 79.5K즈음이 완익구간입니다^^
👍3
아시아 하이(77,297) 1시간봉 마감이 스윕으로 마감되면 단기 숏각 한번 살펴보죠
👍9
롱포지션 셋업!!! 파란색가로줄 (저점)과 1.272 스윕이후 강한거래량과 함께 SFP확정시 롱진입예정! 전제조건은 스윕과 거래량입니다!
👍15
일단 1.13 터치~ 아직 런던 킬존 전이니 조금더 기다려봅니다 여기서 한번더 강하게 꽂은이후의 PA가중요!
👍4👌2
월레인지 하단 1.13과 1.272구간에 전저점도 있으니 SFP을 기대해볼수 있는 상황...포지션 기회를 줄것 같습니다^^!
👍12
현재 이더리움은 날봉상 메인 매물대(2170~2040)에서 한번의 지지가 나온상황~! 롱에 힘이 실리려면 2390불 정도에 안착이 급선무~ 하지만 그 구역이 저항이 된다면 다음은 2000불까지는 열어두고 봐야할것 같습니다 4H FVG가 두곳이나 발생되었고 큰 상승파동의 골든포켓도 몰린구간이니 말이죠 무엇보다 메인매물대의 확실한 테스트를 거쳤다고 볼수 없기에 주요한 구간으로 보고있습니다 일단 오늘이 월요일이니 무빙을 보고 포지션을 구축해 봐야겠습니다
👍10
현재 이더리움은 날봉상 메인 매물대(2170~2040)에서 한번의 지지가 나온상황~! 롱에 힘이 실리려면 2390불 정도에 안착이 급선무~ 하지만 그 구역이 저항이 된다면 다음은 2000불까지는 열어두고 봐야할것 같습니다 4H FVG가 두곳이나 발생되었고 큰 상승파동의 골든포켓도 몰린구간이니 말이죠 무엇보다 메인매물대의 확실한 테스트를 거쳤다고 볼수 없기에 주요한 구간으로 보고있습니다 일단 오늘이 월요일이니 무빙을 보고 포지션을 구축해 봐야겠습니다^^
🔥7👍3👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @ApexFlowpros. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pros Trading Official” (@ApexFlowpros), 14,020 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ApexFlowpros.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.