https://open.kakao.com/o/gN7hVW7c coco878 비번 대화하고 싶으신 분들 ㄱㄱ (정보 공유는 많지 않음. 잡담 많음)
❤13👍6

Channel
@coincodekr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,530subscribers
-297 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001298435287 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coincodekr |
| Created | 29 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coincodekr |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 10,530 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 10,540 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 10,553 | -13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 10,566 | -14 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 10,580 | -29 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 10,609 | -15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 10,624 | -15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:54 | 10,639 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:27 | 10,641 | -13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:05 | 10,654 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 10,660 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 10,666 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 10,669 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 10,679 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 10,690 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 10,692 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 10,705 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 10,716 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 10,724 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 10,731 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
55 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 29 | 52.7% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 43.6% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2025 to 5 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://open.kakao.com/o/gN7hVW7c coco878 비번 대화하고 싶으신 분들 ㄱㄱ (정보 공유는 많지 않음. 잡담 많음)
❤13👍6
1월 7일 암호화폐 소식 모음 https://coincode.kr/28626
👍6❤4🤬1
리플 CEO “트럼프 강세장은 현실이다” https://coincode.kr/28623
👍3
Crypto Dan : “비트코인 – 미국 투자자들의 심리 회복” https://coincode.kr/28617
🥰1
마이크로스트레티지, 우선주 공모로 최대 20억 달러 조달 계획 .. 비트코인 추매 목적 https://coincode.kr/28612
👍5❤1
미 이더리움 현물 ETF, 어제 5852만 달러 순유입 https://coincode.kr/28609
❤1
미 비트코인 현물 ETF, 어제 9억 813만 달러 순유입 https://coincode.kr/28605
[전날 美 ETH 현물 ETF 1137억원 순유출] 파사이드 인베스터에 따르면 전날(현지시간) 미국 ETH 현물 ETF에서 7751만 달러(한화 약 1137억원)가 순유출된 것으로 집계됐다. 비트와이즈 ETHW에서 5610만 달러가, 그레이스케일 ETHE에서 2140만 달러가 순유출됐으며 나머지 ETF에서는 순유출입이 나타나지 않았다. https://coinness.com/news/1116427 코인니스 활동 보상 '펄'출시! 앱 다운로드 후 활동 보상부터 중요 속보 알림까지 받아보세요!!
❤4👍2
1월 3일 암호화폐 소식 모음 https://coincode.kr/28603
미 비트코인 현물 ETF, 어제 2억 4140만 달러 순유출 https://coincode.kr/28600
[[2025 전망 ③] “NFT 부활 신호탄…게임파이 전망은 글쎄”] 암호화폐 전문 미디어 더블록의 리서치팀 애널리스트 18명이 각각 2025년 업계 및 시장 전망을 내놓았다. 코인니스가 요약 정리해 3편에 나눠 송고한다. 1. 알렉산다르 부코브스키(Aleksandar Bukovski): 아르헨티나 또는 미국 와이오밍, 텍사스가 세계 최초로 BTC 전략적 준비자산 시스템을 구현할 가능성이 높다. SOL 현물 ETF는 오는 10월 출시될 가능성이 크다. 실물자산(RWA) 거래량은 20조 달러를 넘어서고 토큰화 채권이 이 분야를 지배할 것이다. 펌프닷펀 생태계를 필두로 밈코인은 지속 상승할 것이다. 2. 이반 우(Ivan Wu): 전통금융 기관들은 암호화폐 ETF 성공을 지켜본 후 올해 암호화폐 인재 영입에 힘 쓸 것이다. 기업들은 지난 18개월…
👍1
[[2025 전망 ②] “밈코인 슈퍼사이클 끝 아냐…디파이도 주목해야”] 암호화폐 전문 미디어 더블록의 리서치팀 애널리스트 18명이 각각 2025년 업계 및 시장 전망을 내놓았다. 코인니스가 요약 정리해 3편에 나눠 송고한다. 1. 이안 데벤도프(Ian Devendorf): 올해는 암호화폐에 대한 미국의 규제 기조가 변화하는 것에서 시작할 것이다. 앞으로 기관 자본이 유입되면서 암호화폐 시장 역학은 완전히 뒤바뀔 가능성이 있다. 과거 70% 수준의 변동폭을 보였던 BTC는 통제된 자본 유입으로 변동폭이 약 40~50% 수준으로 완화될 것이다. 대신 이로 인해 BTC는 전통적인 위험자산과 상관관계가 높아지는 대가를 치러야 할 수도 있다. 2. 에드빈 메멧(Edvin Memet): 올해 암호화폐 시장은 지난해와 마찬가지로 과거 패턴을 벗어나 우연…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coincodekr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코인코드 - 정보방” (@coincodekr), 10,530 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coincodekr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.