요즘 마인드😉
😁46❤32🐳6😍1

Channel
@one_going
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46,343subscribers
+453 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002249953555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @one_going |
| Description | 핵심만, 심플하고, 간결하게, 쉽게 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/one_going |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 46,343 | +40 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 46,303 | +39 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 46,264 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 46,252 | +20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 46,232 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 46,227 | +40 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 46,187 | +41 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 46,146 | +55 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 46,091 | +14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 46,077 | +42 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 46,035 | +63 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 45,972 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 45,958 | +28 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 45,930 | +18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 45,912 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 45,904 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 45,890 | first reading |
135 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 135 (2 August 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,184,160 |
| Reactions total | 25,637 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
25,078 reactions across 132 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10,602 | 42.3% | |
| 👍 | 7,790 | 31.1% | |
| 😭 | 1,612 | 6.43% | |
| 😁 | 1,424 | 5.68% | |
| 🔥 | 514 | 2.05% | |
| 🤔 | 485 | 1.93% | |
| 😢 | 470 | 1.87% | |
| 💯 | 436 | 1.74% | |
| 🥰 | 413 | 1.65% | |
| 🤣 | 402 | 1.60% | |
| 💘 | 274 | 1.09% | |
| 🙈 | 152 | 0.606% | |
| ✍ | 115 | 0.459% | |
| 😇 | 76 | 0.303% | |
| 😍 | 67 | 0.267% | |
| 😴 | 52 | 0.207% | |
| 🐳 | 41 | 0.163% | |
| 😘 | 40 | 0.16% | |
| 🤡 | 37 | 0.148% | |
| 🎉 | 30 | 0.12% | |
| 2 further kinds | 46 | 0.183% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,637reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
요즘 마인드😉
😁46❤32🐳6😍1
그리고 이미지 만드는 분들을 위한 팁을 하나 드리자면, 이미지에 많은 글자 담지 마세요. (저는 글자 최대한 빼는거에만 집중합니다) 텍스트가 이미지화 되야되는 이유는? 가독성이죠. (글자가 많이 들어갈수록 가독성은 떨어짐. 그러면 텍스트가 낫거든요)
❤73👍39🥰5😘5
1) 제가 만들어서 올리는 한장 이미지들은 초보분들을 위한 자료입니다. (분류나 요약이 초보분들 접근이 편하다 전 생각) 2) 잘하는 분들을 위한 공유가 아니기에 볼게 없을겁니다. (다만 AI 딸깍이 아닌 핵심만 다 담은 자료는 될거고요) 3) 제 주식매매 접근방식이기도 한데요. 복잡한걸 심플하게, 어려운걸 쉽게, 긴거는 핵심만 남기고, 쉬운걸 더 쉽게, (틀린거 한번씩 있어도 이해해주시고요. 자료 만들때 느끼는건 애널리스트 분들 대단하다고 생각. 긴 보고서에서 틀리는거없이 어트케 만드시는지 신기방기)
❤160👍56🥰8😘3💘1
국내 비만치료제 관련주 한장요약
❤78👍22💯18😭6💘2
코인쪽은 정배열이후 조정폭이 매우 적은 상황. 강하다는 의미로 해석해도 되고 조정이 나올만도 한데 안나오네요? (차트 오른쪽은 누구도 모른다)
🔥45❤25👍13✍6🤔1
이더리움ETF 유입유출 현황 (어제까지 순매수세 이어지는중. 예전 불장때 수치만큼은 아니지만 순유입이란거에 의미를) 제가 코인할때 가장 의미있게 보는 이미지
👍35❤16💯5🔥3
중국 휴머노이드 로봇 대회 축구 근황. (은근 재밌긴 하네요. 퇴장도 당함😭😭) *중국 휴머노이드 로봇 대회는 오는 26일(수)까지 16개국에서 온 666개 팀과 2056대의 로봇이 참여한 가운데 열리며 51개 종목에서 기술 대결을 펼친다.
😁42❤13🙈9😴5🫡2💯1😭1
중국 휴머노이드 로봇 대회 멀리뛰기 근황
🤔24😁16👍12❤6🤡4💯2🙈1
이미지가 귀여바서. 좋은 저녁요. 출처 iani.meow
❤93😁23🥰10💘7🤔2😇1
Photo, posted without a caption
'국장' 순환매는 계속 골고루 나오는데...뭔가 '알파'가 약간 부족한 느낌이죠? (도파민에 너무 길들여졌나봅니다 ㅎ 그 알파는 결국 '기대감을 강하게 만드는 스토리'라고 전 생각하네요 60일선 근방까지 올라온게 늘었고, 정배열 만드는 구간을 앞두고..스토리가 붙는 섹터가 모멘텀을 만들겠죠. 순환매+종목장세는 이어지는중. 금, 코인쪽이 지난 한주는 오히려 더 의미있는 흐름이었고요.
❤61💘15🔥6
금땡이는 어느세 이만큼이나 오름
❤63😁13🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @one_going. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 59,743 of 1,601,189entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“요약하는 고잉” (@one_going), 46,343 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/one_going.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.