김택진 대표님의 키는 162로 알려져 있습니다
😁3🔥1🫡1

Channel
@hedgehara
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,586subscribers
+261 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001506140857 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hedgehara |
| Description | Disclamer 종목의 매수매도 추천을 하지 않으며 공개된 통계자료 및 데이터를 가공 및 요약하여 제공합니다. 투자는 본인의 판단으로 이루어져야합니다. |
| Created | 21 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hedgehara |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:11 | 19,586 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:19 | 19,593 | +53 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:59 | 19,540 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:27 | 19,541 | +65 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:46 | 19,476 | -26 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:55 | 19,502 | +9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:21 | 19,493 | +154 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 19,339 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 19,337 | -22 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 19,359 | +19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:51 | 19,340 | -47 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 19,387 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:25 | 19,396 | +17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:58 | 19,379 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 19,380 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 19,376 | -15 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:00 | 19,391 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 19,404 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 19,408 | +90 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 19,318 | first reading |
772 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 132 of 160 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 772 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 385,773 |
| Reactions total | 1,370 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 03:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,999 reactions across 632 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,506 | 21.5% | |
| 😁 | 1,086 | 15.5% | |
| 👍 | 1,024 | 14.6% | |
| 🖕 | 476 | 6.80% | |
| 🤣 | 355 | 5.07% | |
| 🤯 | 273 | 3.90% | |
| 🍌 | 263 | 3.76% | |
| 🔥 | 220 | 3.14% | |
| 😱 | 217 | 3.10% | |
| 😡 | 202 | 2.89% | |
| 💯 | 144 | 2.06% | |
| 👏 | 128 | 1.83% | |
| 🥰 | 126 | 1.80% | |
| 🫡 | 111 | 1.59% | |
| 🤮 | 103 | 1.47% | |
| 😭 | 90 | 1.29% | |
| 🤪 | 89 | 1.27% | |
| 💩 | 73 | 1.04% | |
| 😇 | 64 | 0.914% | |
| 😨 | 64 | 0.914% | |
| 32 further kinds | 385 | 5.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 666 of the 772 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 772 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hedgehara. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 772 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 160 posts held from the last 30 days (3.13%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
김택진 대표님의 키는 162로 알려져 있습니다
😁3🔥1🫡1
TJ니뮤ㅠㅠ...
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2😭2
아니 잠깐 그럼 돈많아도 키는 방법이 없단건가
🤯2
TJ님께선 "내키에 무슨 시발"하고 반박하셨읍니다 “내 (작은) 키로 그 연예인을 만나는 게 가능할까?” 김택진 엔씨소프트 대표가 ‘연예인 염문설’에 대한 입장을 밝혔다. 김택진 대표는 27일 능률협회 주최로 제주 신라호텔에서 열린 ‘최고경영자 세미나’에 참석, 인기 여성 연예인과 사귀고 있다는 소문에 대해 “내 키에?”라고 일축했다. 그의 키는 160~165cm 정도로 알려져 있다. https://biz.newdaily.co.kr/site/data/html/2012/07/28/2012072810004.amp.html
😁5❤2🍌1
판사님 고양이가 검색했습니다 야옹야옹
❤1
신민아 생일은 왜..?
판사님 저는 김택진대표님과 신민아가 어떠한 뭐라고 말한 적이 없습니다
❤1
계절성 믿는건 빙그레 여름에사고 가스공사 겨울에 사면 먹는다고 매매하는 놈이랑 다를바가 없음
🍌5❤2
미너비니한테 저거나 보내줘야지 진짜
❤3🍌1
그놈의 계절성
🍌4
<미너비니 "중간선거 이후 불확실성 해소, 계절적으로 유리한 구간에 들어왔다"> 1. 시장이 흔들린 이유: 결과가 나빠서가 아니라 '예상 밖'이라서 미너비니는 지금 시장을 흔드는 것이 "누가 이겼냐"가 아니라 "이렇게까지 크게 이길 줄 몰랐다"는 놀라움이라고 본다. 시장은 좋은 뉴스든 나쁜 뉴스든 미리 예상하고 있으면 주가에 반영해 둔다. 문제는 아무도 예상하지 못한 결과다. 준비가 안 돼 있으니 일단 출렁일 수밖에 없다 2. '분열정부' 대통령과 의회가 다른 당이면 오히려 예측하기 쉬워진다 이제 대통령은 공화당, 의회는 민주당인 상황이 됐다. 이를 '분열 정부'라고 부른다. 이렇게 되면 어느 한쪽이 세금, 정부 지출, 규제를 마음대로 크게 바꾸기 어렵다. 정책이 갑자기 뒤집힐 가능성이 줄어드는 셈이고, 주식시장은 이런 예측 가능한…
❤8🍌1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 772 posts we hold for @hedgehara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 90 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pluto Research” (@hedgehara), 19,586 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hedgehara.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.