Video, posted without a caption

Channel
여의도 감성투자
@ygamsung
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,735subscribers
+223 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001117483208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ygamsung |
| Description | 대한민국 기업들을 응원합니다. 단순 정보를 제공할 뿐 매수 매도 의견을 제시하는 것이 아닙니다. 최종 투자판단은 각 개인에게 있습니다. |
| Created | 2 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ygamsung |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 6,735 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:51 | 6,743 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:28 | 6,742 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:54 | 6,745 | +3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 6,742 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:47 | 6,741 | +29 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 6,712 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 6,713 | -3 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 09:57 | 6,716 | -4 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 6,720 | -10 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 6,730 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 6,735 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:35 | 6,739 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 6,745 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 6,749 | +35 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 6,714 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 6,717 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 6,710 | +26 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 6,684 | +27 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 6,657 | first reading |
Engagement
73 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.5%
- avg views ÷ 6,735 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,520
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 73 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 73 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 30,301 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 01:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 224
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 522
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 47s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
?
[속보]국민연금 10년 가입자 수령액, 기초연금보다 적어
$PLTR update - TCV(분기수주액) yoy +5.7%로 기대치 하회. 그 결과 RDV(잔여계약)도 qoq +2.3% 증가에 그침 - RDV/매출은 1.45배까지 하락했고 매출성장률이 수주/잔여계약 성장률을 앞지르고 있는 상황에서 성장의 지속가능성에 대한 의문 증대 - 컨콜에서 계약기간이 평소보다 짧았다는 언급을 하면서 4Q 가이던스를 상향했는데, (계약의 갱신을 통해) 낮아진 RDV/매출 상황에서도 현재와 같은 성장률이 나올 수 있는지 시험대에 오른 상황 - 긍정적인 측면은 NRR은 165%로 2Q(157%)보다도 더 오름. 팔란티어는 AI slop이 아니라 생산성 증대를 가져온다는 것은 숫자로 나날이 증명 - Alex와 Ryan의 혼을 담은 구라 컨콜(e.g. 세계사적 갈림길에 서있다)은 어떤 결과로 돌아올 것인가? AH -2…
권대영 금융위원회 부위원장이 "100% 매수를 강제할 경우 M&A 인수 자금 부담으로 시장이 위축된다"며 1997년 입법례를 들어 50%+1주 방안을 강력히 고수한 것이다. 이 같은 구조가 관철된 배후에는 사모펀드(PEF) 업계의 물밑 대관과 금융위원회의 정책적 요구가 맞물려 있다는 분석이 많다. 금융당국은 "인수 자금 부담 완화를 통한 M&A 위축 방지"를 명분으로 내세웠으나 실증 연구 결과는 이와 정반대다.
https://naver.me/xnO2a9rb
만 73세 억만장자 할배도 크립토 DEX 투자하고 X에 홍보함. 열심히 살아야겠지?
$MSFT $GOOGL CAPEX, FCF, 주주환원 확연한 전략차이 AH $MSFT +3.18% $GOOGL -9.11%
불과 3개월 만에 천지개벽
국장의 미장화
SK하이닉스 컨콜 中 "저희가 창출하고 있는 이익과 현금흐름을 충분히 반영하지 못하고 저평가되어 있다고 보고 있습니다. 이러한 상황에서 자기 주식을 매입하여 소각하는 것이 주당 가치를 높이는 효과적인 방법 이라고 판단했습니다."
제일 궁금했던 Muse 부분만 1. Muse 초기 성과 - 설정한 사람의 약 25%가 매일 사용하고, 오래 쓸수록 리텐션이 더 좋아짐 - 가장 많이 쓰는 용도는 쇼핑: 사용자의 4분의 1 이상, 평균 구매액 200달러 이상 - 첫 주 거래량이 예상을 넘어 Stripe와 신용한도를 올림 - 쇼핑 다음으로 많이 쓰는 커넥터는 생산성 도구와 이메일·캘린더 연동 - 상위 모델 Muse Wonder를 쓰면 참여와 리텐션이 더 올라감 → - 모델이 좋아질수록 Muse도 좋아짐 2. 사업모델 - 대부분 무료로 제공 - 커머스 수수료: Muse가 성사시킨 거래에서 기업이 냄 - 구독: 최상위 모델이나 추가 토큰을 원하는 사용자가 직접 냄 3. 비용 - 지금은 컴퓨트 비용이 매우 큼 - 내년에 비용효율 10배 이상 개선 → 매출이 규모를 갖추면 흑자 가…
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @ygamsung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ygamsung edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@songjongsik · 18,5344 postsPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,5933 posts뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,6771 post차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,0961 post디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 12,8961 post프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,7101 post습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,2811 post미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 73,8191 post인터넷/플랫폼/성장산업/투자 뉴스, 정보 스크랩
@miraeyj · 5,6281 postBack To The Future 디터
@monsjae · 1591 post어이 청진기
@rising_090 · 3,2791 postsilver_mansachs
@silver_mansachs · 21 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sypark_strategy · 29,288
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
@jeilstock · 26,265
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
@athletes_village · 22,154
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
@globaletfi · 20,553
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
@habit4117 · 28,281
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@daegurr · 23,733
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
@bufkr · 21,623
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@EarlyStock1 · 24,394
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
@HS_academy · 36,135
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@GoUpstock · 21,090
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
@TNBfolio · 25,129
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@pharmbiohana · 29,781
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,253
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@rafikiresearch · 20,674
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@SmallCap · 23,020
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
@merITz_tech · 24,696
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
@yieldnspread · 22,071
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@desperatestudycafe · 18,528
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
@huhpharm · 24,266
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@survival_DoPB · 22,092
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@Jstockclass · 26,522
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“여의도 감성투자” (@ygamsung), 6,735 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ygamsung.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.