Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 도PB의 생존투자

Channel

도PB의 생존투자

@survival_DoPB

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,125subscribers

-438 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001612596289
TypeChannel
Username@survival_DoPB
Created1 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/survival_DoPB

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,12522,56322,3446 August 2026 — 22,563 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,563 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,557 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,549 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,547 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,543 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,525 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,513 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,511 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,499 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,486 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,478 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,476 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,465 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,458 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,446 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,444 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,426 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,414 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,403 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,383 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,363 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,353 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,341 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,321 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,304 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,275 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,317 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,313 subscribers8 September 2026 — 22,290 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,295 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,292 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,287 subscribers16 September 2026 — 22,281 subscribers18 September 2026 — 22,275 subscribers25 September 2026 — 22,243 subscribers4 October 2026 — 22,202 subscribers8 October 2026 — 22,179 subscribers12 October 2026 — 22,159 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,155 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,148 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,153 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,149 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,150 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,137 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,133 subscribers21 October 2026 — 22,126 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,125 subscribers6 August 202622 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 78 days, net -438. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,059–22,629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 15:3922,125-1
21 Oct 2026, 09:5922,126-7
20 Oct 2026, 05:5822,133-4
19 Oct 2026, 08:3822,137-13
18 Oct 2026, 05:5622,150+1
17 Oct 2026, 06:4722,149-4
16 Oct 2026, 09:0022,153+5
15 Oct 2026, 11:0922,148-7
14 Oct 2026, 11:0422,155-4
12 Oct 2026, 23:3822,159-20
8 Oct 2026, 11:5622,179-23
4 Oct 2026, 00:3822,202-41
25 Sept 2026, 03:1722,243-32
18 Sept 2026, 22:2122,275-6
16 Sept 2026, 15:5922,281-6
14 Sept 2026, 21:5922,287-5
13 Sept 2026, 07:2122,292-3
11 Sept 2026, 10:3722,295+5
8 Sept 2026, 13:5622,290-23
5 Sept 2026, 07:1522,313first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 22,125 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,580
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.187%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held55 (4 August 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total50,250
Reactions total94
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

539 reactions across 52 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 603724072115556153640274.6%
🔥519.46%
⚡346.31%
💯295.38%
🙏173.15%
🦄61.11%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 556 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 01:37 UTC≈3,530 views16 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

미국이 막대한 국가부채 부담을 앞으로 어떤 방식으로 처리할 가능성이 높은가? Muddle through indefinitely 40% → Inflation 23% → Stronger economic growth 20% → Financial repression 12% → Fiscal consolidation 4% 높은 부채와 재정적자를 유지하면서 경제가 이를 버텨내는 상태가 상당 기간 지속될 것 DB 설문이 말하는 미국 부채의 가장 가능성 높은 미래는 ‘부채를 줄이는 것’이 아니라 ‘부채보다 경제와 물가를 더 빨리 키우는 것’이며, 이는 구조적으로 높은 명목성장률·인플레이션·장기금리 환경을 의미함. 따라서 향후 주식시장의 승자는 저금리를 기다리는 기업이 아니라 높은 자본비용을 압도할 수 있는 성장률과 현금흐름을 가진 기업일 가능성이 높음.

custom 603724072115556153616

2 Oct 2026, 12:03 UTC≈4,940 views15 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Toshiba가 하드디스크 드라이브(HDD) 공급 능력을 두 배로 늘리기 위해 600억 엔을 투자할 예정

custom 603724072115556153613🔥2

30 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈6,680 views15 reactionsread 12 October 2026

US 🇺🇸 PCE / GDP DATA: Core PCE YoY: 3.0% (Est. 3.3%, Prior 3.3%) Core PCE MoM: 0.2% (Est. 0.3%, Prior 0.2%) PCE YoY: 3.4% (Est. 3.7%, Prior 3.7%) PCE MoM: 0.3% (Est. 0.3%, Prior 0.2%) Q2 Final GDP: 2.2% (Est. 1.5%) Advance Goods Trade Balance: -$132.6B (Est. -$115B, Prior -$118.9B)

🙏9custom 60372407211555615364💯2

28 Sept 2026, 07:44 UTC≈6,520 views14 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Forwarded from @dykim0210

노무라 반도체 부족 지수(Nomura CSI; 블룸버그 티커: NMRCSI index)는 공급이 여전히 부족한 상황에서 강력한 수요가 이어짐에 따라 8월과 9월에 반도체 품귀 현상이 심화되었음을 가리켰습니다. 두어 달간의 숨고르기를 거친 후, 노무라 CSI는 다시 모멘텀을 회복하여 9월에 103.9라는 사상 최고치로 다시 올라섰습니다. 당사는 지속적인 수요-공급 불균형을 반영해 10월에도 해당 지수가 더욱 상승할 것으로 전망하고 있습니다.

custom 603724072115556153612🙏2

28 Sept 2026, 07:44 UTC≈5,940 views6 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Forwarded from @dykim0210Photo

Asia Insights, NOMURA

custom 60372407211555615366

28 Sept 2026, 04:27 UTC≈5,930 views9 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

🤩CTA flow CTA는 시장 하락 시 840억 달러를 매도하고, 보합 시 포지션을 유지하며, 상승 시 40억 달러를 매수할 수 있음. 다음 주 주식이 하락할 경우, 하락 국면의 시스템 매도는 CTA가 주도할 것 출처: BofA Global Research

custom 60372407211555615369

22 Sept 2026, 22:20 UTC≈6,370 views7 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

33%의 FMS 응답자가 기업이 과잉투자하고 있다고 답해 기록적 수준

custom 60372407211555615367

22 Sept 2026, 22:19 UTC≈5,560 views7 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

미 10년물과 WTI의 3개월 rolling correlation이 65%로 35년 최고 수준까지 상승

custom 60372407211555615367

22 Sept 2026, 22:18 UTC≈4,780 views5 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

가장 Crowded한 Trade는 Global Semis

🔥4custom 60372407211555615361

22 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC≈4,940 views12 reactionsread 12 October 2026

이란, 미국의 봉쇄 완화 시 7일 내 호르무즈 해협 재개방 제안: 교도통신 이란은 워싱턴이 이란 항구에 대한 봉쇄를 종식하기 위한 초기 조치를 취하고 해협 주변의 군사 작전을 중단한다면 7일 내에 호르무즈 해협을 재개방하겠다고 제안했다고 교도통신이 이란 고위 관리를 인용해 보도했다. 이 제안은 중재자들을 통해 워싱턴에 전달된 것으로 전해지며, 테헤란은 유엔 총회 주변에서 추가 회담을 계획하고 있다. 아직 합의에 도달하지 않았다. 이란은 이전에 호르무즈 재개방을 미국의 봉쇄 종식과 연계한 바 있다.

custom 603724072115556153611⚡1

22 Sept 2026, 09:56 UTC≈4,270 views6 reactionsread 12 October 2026

이란 고위 당국자, 미국이 실질적인 조치를 취한다면 테헤란은 외교 재개를 환영한다고 밝혀

custom 60372407211555615365🔥1

21 Sept 2026, 04:18 UTC≈4,880 views15 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

🤩MSCI ACWI(All Country World Index) 연한 파란색 막대: 해당 연도에 전년보다 P/E가 상승한 종목의 비율 진한 파란색 선: MSCI ACWI의 연간 수익률 빨간 점선: 약 36% 수준, 현재 2026년의 P/E 상승 종목 비중과 유사한 레벨임 2026년을 보면 MSCI ACWI는 대략 +10% 안팎의 플러스 수익률을 기록하고 있는데, 전년보다 P/E가 높아진 종목은 전체의 약 36% 정도에 불과함. 즉 주가는 올랐지만 대부분의 종목에서 밸류에이션 멀티플은 오히려 확장되지 않았다는 것이 핵심임. 고금리가 글로벌 주식시장의 P/E를 누르고 있다는 증거 2026년 글로벌 증시는 지수가 올랐음에도 대부분의 종목에서 P/E가 올라가지 않았으며, 이는 현재 시장 상승이 밸류에이션 버블보다는 이익 성장에 의해 지탱되고…

⚡8custom 60372407211555615366🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @survival_DoPB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

💯똥밭에 굴러도 주식판
@daegurr · 23,505
#1
김찰저의 관심과 생각 저장소
@kimcharger · 25,069
#2
야자반 - Y.Z. stock
@yaza_stock · 13,052
#3
에테르의 일본&미국 리서치
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,807
#4
기술적 분석으로 보는 주식시장 (by 소라게아빠)
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,411
#5
AWAKE - 52주 신고가 모니터링
@awake_realtimeCheck · 22,841
#6
FOMO 4가투
@fourgachi · 9,431
#7
호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,306
#8
올바른
@allbareun · 12,210
#9
묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,678
#10
타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,762
#11
Stock Trip
@stocktrip · 7,249
#12
양파농장
@Onionfarmer · 16,069
#13
쩜상리서치
@upper_limit_price · 7,982
#14
주식 급등일보🚀급등테마·대장주 탐색기 | Korean Stocks
@FastStockNews · 128,795
#15
실전매매전략 : 마켓타이밍
@stockgrandmaster · 11,010
#16
드리머의 잃지 않는 투자
@orangeboard · 4,613
#17
시장 이야기 by 제이슨
@bumgore · 35,389
#18
제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver
@pharmbiohana · 29,790
#19
Buff
@bufkr · 21,826
#20
YM리서치
@ym_research · 40,039
#21
테크밸리 Insight
@triple_stock · 13,311
#22
가치투자클럽
@corevalue · 67,360
#23
퀀텀 알고리즘
@quantum_ALGO · 7,606
#24
반붐온? 방붐온?
@cpshelter · 5,402
#25
빠르고 정확한 주식정보방
@fastest_info1 · 13,434
#26
그로쓰리서치(Growth Research) [독립리서치]
@growthresearch · 40,141
#27
BUYagra
@psychotherapy101 · 5,943
#28
서초동 투자머신
@twomachine · 5,285
#29
인포마켓 infomarket
@infomarketopen · 9,662
#30
범송공자 X 29PER
@bumsong2 · 13,254
#31
Macrotrader - 금융치료
@slsyphus · 4,441
#32
@아무자료 아무노래(2026년, 계급사회 가속화 3.0)
@anysong_Technon · 4,970
#33
소형주 투자자 텔레그램
@small_stock · 9,160
#34
습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,054
#35
YIELD & SPREAD
@yieldnspread · 22,065
#36
돌다리🚦
@stbridgee · 4,654
#37
상장기업 수사대 ☎️
@cyber_rangers · 16,906
#38
미국 제약-바이오 주식/약장수
@yakjangsu · 11,387
#39
Thesis
@thesis_true · 2,277
#40
CTT Research
@CTTResearch · 6,876
#41
Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,551
#42
피카츄 아저씨⚡️
@pikachu_aje · 25,081
#43
AWAKE - 마켓 브리핑
@awake_schedule · 17,392
#44
오를주식 - 뉴스/경제/주식
@GoUpstock · 21,012
#45
글로벌바이오아저씨
@choaz1 · 7,009
#46
조기주식회 공부방
@EarlyStock1 · 24,313
#47
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,159
#48
탐방봇
@TambangVot · 8,480
#49
마산창투
@PRROEresearch · 4,639
#50
엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실
@Jstockclass · 26,332
#51
한국투자증권/기관영업부/이민근
@mk81_koreainvestment · 16,565
#52
TNBfolio
@TNBfolio · 24,961
#53
카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 22,776
#54
KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 20,788
#55
돼지바
@bbong_tta · 12,790
#56
뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,717
#57
한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 16,529
#58
레드버드 기업분석
@redbirdstock · 10,686
#59
텐렙
@Ten_level · 17,050
#60
투자의 빅 픽처를 위한 퍼즐 한 조각
@investment_puzzle · 14,364
#61
한양증권 제약/바이오 오병용
@bdragon0808 · 13,470
#62
投資, 아레테
@mstaryun · 18,814
#63
서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,470
#64
TRENDSETTER GLOBAL
@TRENDSETTERVERSION2 · 3,907
#65
간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,643
#66
선수촌
@athletes_village · 22,049
#67
루팡
@bornlupin · 48,831
#68
캬오의 공부방
@Kyaooo · 17,448
#69
Yeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,209
#70
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 65,234
#71
영리한 동물원
@stockinvcowcow · 13,592
#72
유튜브 채부심 Official 채널
@aptvalueprice · 10,525
#73
재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,225
#74
선진짱 주식공부방
@sunstudy1111 · 54,883
#75
주린이 개소리하는 채널
@Dogrini · 4,740
#76
석학들의 마켓 (인)사이트 PRO
@getfeed · 8,800
#77
MZ타뇽 긴축모드 ON
@mztanyong · 6,059
#78
인상주의 투자 인생 업그레이드노트
@insangnism · 11,253
#79
지휘통제실
@Fire_Direction_Center · 5,350
#80
몰?루
@molru · 3,806
#81
Financial Magazine
@hanagae · 4,617
#82
퍼가요~♡
@hwalja · 3,493
#83
투자자문 와이즈리서치 경제공부방
@econostudy · 8,464
#84
디일렉(THEELEC)
@theelec · 10,826
#85
이지스스트레티지 리서치
@jeilstock · 26,314
#86
돈맥경화 연구소
@Donmaek · 6,532
#87
여의도 감성투자
@ygamsung · 6,741
#88
유해섹터 인겜미
@tteoksangMalangCow · 24 (as read 21 September 2026)
#89
2차전지 김희제
@EvAtZchuno · 5,912
#90

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀
@SmallCap · 23,093
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
피카츄 아저씨⚡️
@pikachu_aje · 25,081
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
스탁이지 - AI 투자 어시스턴트
@maddingStock · 20,588
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,551
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver
@pharmbiohana · 29,790
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
시황맨의 주식이야기
@shmstory · 39,173
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
에테르의 일본&미국 리서치
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,807
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
AWAKE - 52주 신고가 모니터링
@awake_realtimeCheck · 22,841
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
키움증권 미국주식 톡톡
@kwusa · 36,362
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
YM리서치
@ym_research · 40,039
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
기술적 분석으로 보는 주식시장 (by 소라게아빠)
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,411
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
허혜민의 제약/바이오 소식통
@huhpharm · 24,286
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
신영증권 박소연
@sypark_strategy · 29,398
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
TNBfolio
@TNBfolio · 24,961
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
조기주식회 공부방
@EarlyStock1 · 24,313
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
김찰저의 관심과 생각 저장소
@kimcharger · 25,069
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
YIELD & SPREAD
@yieldnspread · 22,065
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
시장 이야기 by 제이슨
@bumgore · 35,389
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,159
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Buff
@bufkr · 21,826
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실
@Jstockclass · 26,332
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
💯똥밭에 굴러도 주식판
@daegurr · 23,505
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
[하나 Global ETF] 박승진
@globaletfi · 20,498
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
그로쓰리서치(Growth Research) [독립리서치]
@growthresearch · 40,141
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“도PB의 생존투자” (@survival_DoPB), 22,125 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/survival_DoPB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.