주식 투자를 잘하는 사람의 성격 '💯'

Channel
주린이 개소리하는 채널
@Dogrini
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,787subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001711968972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dogrini |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dogrini |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 4,787 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 4,797 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 4,806 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 4,809 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 4,814 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 4,815 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 4,816 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 4,821 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 4,827 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 4,832 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 4,833 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.57%
- avg views ÷ 4,787 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 123
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (27 May 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 123 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 34s
- Average length
- 1m 34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
68 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 19.1% | |
| 😭 | 12 | 17.6% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 13.2% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 8.82% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 8.82% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 8.82% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
이새끼만 없애도 엔비디아 디램 탑재 늘릴수 있는거 아니냐
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
누가 얘네한테 동시호가라는걸 좀 알려줘 https://n.news.naver.com/article/018/0006346201?cds=news_edit
😁2
회사에 돈벌러 나오냐와 군대 강제로 왔냐, 수련회 놀러왔냐로 조기단련된 한국인이 있습니다 많은 채용 부탁
😁1
ㅇㅎ 신안 1조 추경ㅋㅋ
😇2🔥1
켄 그리핀 (Citadel) 금일 발언 없음 (최근 스탠스: AI를 "가비지"라고 폄하했던 기존 입장에서 선회해 AI가 "기업가정신의 황금기"를 열 것이라는 쪽으로 견해를 바꿈) 숏 스퀴즈 시킬 땐 쓰레기라고 하고, 자기가 포지션 가져오니까 황금이라고 하고 존경합니다. 선생님
❤2🤮2
미국 좋소 사장 마인드 ㄷㄷ
🤣4
낭만..
❤6🤨3❤🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
왜 빠짐?
🤔6🤣2
오늘 매매에 참고하세용!!
✍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Dogrini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,537
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@bumgore · 35,280
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,361
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,265
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,354
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,687
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@darthacking · 65,062
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@gaoshoukorea · 41,201
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@sunstudy1234 · 54,339
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@HANAchina · 35,040
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@pharmbiohana · 29,914
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
@growthresearch · 40,133
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@ym_research · 40,004
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,116
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@corevalue · 67,711
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@shmstory · 38,041
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@realtime_stock_news · 37,268
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“주린이 개소리하는 채널” (@Dogrini), 4,787 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dogrini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.