https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/024/0000108478?sid=101

Channel
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西
@YeouidoStory2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,446subscribers
-74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001086116949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YeouidoStory2 |
| Description | 볼만한 뉴스와 증권사리포트, 글로벌경제뉴스. 와신 등을 공유합니다. 내용은 매도/매수의 의견이 아닙니다.매매에 대한 책임은 본인에게있습니다 ●/ ●/ 《 | 《 | /〉 제보.문의 /〉 제보/각종 문의 받습니다. @yeouidooppa |
| Created | 19 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YeouidoStory2 |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 58,446 | -43 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:42 | 58,489 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 58,491 | +17 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 58,474 | +96 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 58,378 | +24 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 58,354 | -52 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 58,406 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 58,412 | -23 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:04 | 58,435 | -34 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 58,469 | +19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 58,450 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 58,460 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 58,470 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 58,483 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 58,489 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 58,505 | -22 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 58,527 | -41 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 58,568 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 58,562 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 58,579 | first reading |
Engagement
1,157 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.02%
- avg views ÷ 58,446 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,520
- 709 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.11%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 709
- of 1,157 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 218 of 709 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,157 (6 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,494,118 |
| Reactions total | 922 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 15:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,500
- Videos
- ≈76
- Links
- ≈88,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 44s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,349 reactions across 305 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 436 | 32.3% | |
| 🔥 | 366 | 27.1% | |
| 😱 | 232 | 17.2% | |
| 😁 | 138 | 10.2% | |
| 👏 | 121 | 8.97% | |
| 🙏 | 56 | 4.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 312 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/277/0005820895?sid=101
美 의약품 관세 조치서 韓 0% 면세 확정…K-바이오 ‘100% 관세 폭탄’ 피했다 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/016/0002701685?sid=101
👏6
https://n.news.naver.com/article/001/0016335343?sid=104
🔥2
[종합] 한올바이오파마가 기술수출한 ‘아이메로프루바트(IMVT-1402)’가 피부 홍반성 루푸스 임상에서 1차 평가지표 달성에 실패하며 해당 적응증 개발을 중단합니다. 다만 면역글로불린G(IgG) 감소 효과와 안전성을 재확인한 만큼 그레이브스병과 난치성 류머티즘 관절염, 중증 근무력증 등 핵심 적응증의 임상 개발과 상용화는 예정대로 추진합니다. 한올바이오파마의 미국 파트너사인 이뮤노반트(Immunovant)는 23일(현지시간) 차세대 FcRn 억제제 후보물질인 ‘IMVT-1402’가 피부 홍반성 루푸스 환자를 대상으로 한 개념증명(PoC) 임상2상에서 1차 평가변수를 충족하지 못했으며, 해당 적응증에 대한 개발을 중단한다고 밝혔습니다. IMVT-1402는 한올바이오파마가 자체 개발한 FcRn 억제제 기술을 바탕으로 하며, 지난 2017년…
👏3
두번접으면 매출미 두배인데...가격은? 📰 [경제] 삼성전자 ⏰ 2026-09-23 11:21:12 🔎 - 애플 폴더블 수율 60% ‘비명’ … 삼성 ‘두번접기’로 승부 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/021/0002820923
[하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환] >>혈액 한 관으로 50여 종 암 검사, 미국 FDA 전문가위원회 찬성…AI 암 검진 시대 신호탄? •9월 23일 미국 FDA 전문가위원회는 7:2 표결을 통해 GRAIL의 다중 암 조기검진 제품 Galleri의 이익이 위험보다 크다고 판단했음. Galleri는 AI를 활용해 혈액 속 cfDNA의 메틸화 패턴을 분석해 50여 종의 암을 검사할 수 있으며, 특이도는 최대 99.85%, 양성예측도는 약 77%에 달함. 이는 암 검진이 기존의 ‘장기별’ 방식에서 ‘개인 단위’ 방식으로 전환되는 것을 의미함. AI 데이터 선순환이 핵심 경쟁력을 구축하면서 암 검진의 새로운 시대를 열 가능성 >一管血查50多种癌症,美国FDA专家委员会投票支持,AI筛查时代吹响号角? https://wallstreetcn.com/arti…
[[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]] [메리츠증권 전기전자/IT부품 양승수] ▶ Japanese and Korean MLCC Makers Cut Consumer Supply to Focus on AI, Chinese Suppliers Enter Global Brand Qualification, Says TrendForce - AI 수요가 기존 전통 시장의 수요를 대체하면서 MLCC 산업의 구조적 변화가 시작 - 일본과 한국의 주요 MLCC 업체들은 소비자용 MLCC 공급을 점차 축소하고 생산능력을 AI 관련 애플리케이션으로 재배분 중 - 이에 따라 중국 MLCC 업체들에게 새로운 기회가 열리고 있으며, 다수의 중국 업체들이 Dell, HP, ASUS, Acer 등 글로벌 브랜드의 공급망 진입을 위한 인증을 진행 중 - M…
https://www.sedaily.com/article/20094575
👍5
https://naver.me/Ghwfdxo6
👍2
Ai 글래스 요즘 메타랑 로키드 쓰는데 디스플레이 있는 로키드가 더 활용도가 높음 https://www.youtube.com/live/w9RyNj0ukWo?si=w4UCIqVrqNs3bKHK
어제 만난 AI 관계자 임원 중국 Ai 기술 한국보다 최소 10년 앞서있다. 한국 대규모 투자후 회수 어쩌나 고민하며 미룰때 이미 늦었다. Ai 투자는 인프라 투자라 선투자 후엑시트 생각해야...
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,157 posts we hold for @YeouidoStory2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@YeouidoStory2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 3 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Rhinoceros_300 · 25 posts호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,3274 posts크레박스
@cr_box · 293 postsYeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,3092 posts인포마켓 infomarket
@infomarketopen · 8,5962 posts주식클라쓰_하창봉👍
@sharpha · 9,1532 postsBrain and Body Research
@Brain_And_Body_Research · 35,0311 post제이지의 투자이야기
@JgrowthInv · 3,0111 post한투 제약/바이오 위해주
@KIS_Healthcare · 8,9251 post코인포
@coinpo2 · 6,9381 post간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,8241 postPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,0751 post아스달 (IPO&스몰캡 달인)
@iposmallcap · 2,6101 post김현석(자본주의 바이어스 있는 채널입니다)
@kimu_nim · 7,7971 post세상의 모든 뉴스 - 좋은뉴스,단독,속보,리포트,특허,타 채널 뉴스 - 세모뉴
@newszzang · 11,0131 post힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,1291 post제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver
@pharmbiohana · 29,8431 post로로의 부자아빠
@rorosrichdad · 21 post스몰인사이트리서치
@smallinsightresearch · 5,7231 post손지의 웹3여행 Read
@sonycoinz · 9941 post🗽엄브렐라(Umbrella Research) 리서치+ 네프콘 옆집부자형 since 2020
@umbrellaresearch · 12,8521 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@daegurr · 23,387#1
@FastStockNews · 128,921#2
@corevalue · 67,505#3
@hogniel · 15,327#4
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,309#5
@darthacking · 65,078#6
@bufkr · 22,258#7
@kimcharger · 24,877#8
@bdragon0808 · 13,384#9
@G2strategy · 16,153#10
@tazastock · 40,320#11
@yaza_stock · 13,107#12
@bbanjil · 10,732#13
@hermitcrab41_1 · 20,334#14
@bumgore · 35,352#15
@awake_realtimeCheck · 22,586#16
@Ten_level · 17,133#17
@fastest_info1 · 13,219#18
@Onionfarmer · 15,986#19
@bumsong2 · 13,092#20
@stocktrip · 7,288#21
@growthresearch · 40,127#22
@hedgehara · 19,075#23
@allbareun · 12,221#24
@insangnism · 11,308#25
@hanagae · 4,642#26
@TRENDSETTERVERSION2 · 3,934#27
@realtime_stock_news · 37,210#28
@survival_DoPB · 22,243#29
@orangeboard · 4,678#30
@quantum_ALGO · 7,552#31
@athletes_village · 21,621#32
@GoUpstock · 20,978#33
@cyber_rangers · 16,973#34
@aptvalueprice · 10,716#35
@Dogrini · 4,770#36
@investment_puzzle · 14,377#37
@slsyphus · 4,401#38
@mk81_koreainvestment · 16,327#39
@Fire_Direction_Center · 5,489#40
@ym_research · 40,010#41
@anysong_Technon · 4,976#42
@stockinvcowcow · 14,059#43
@awake_schedule · 17,220#44
@seokokang · 6,249#45
@habit4117 · 27,854#46
@umbrellaresearch · 12,852#47
@knowledge_to_wealth · 14,145#48
@rafikiresearch · 20,596#49
@Kyaooo · 17,397#50
@TNBfolio · 24,657#51
@hankyung_fin · 12,714#52
@HANAchina · 35,284#53
@siglab · 10,841#54
@econostudy · 8,538#55
@jake8lee · 17,256#56
@mistergray_11 · 19,469#57
@EarlyStock1 · 24,432#58
@TambangVot · 8,630#59
@stockhasoo · 5,109#60
@huhpharm · 24,282#61
@bbong_tta · 12,711#62
@gaoshoukorea · 41,159#63
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,469#64
@mstaryun · 18,661#65
@upper_limit_price · 8,003#66
@redbirdstock · 9,963#67
@psychotherapy101 · 5,959#68
@sunstudy1234 · 54,428#69
@stockgrandmaster · 10,953#70
@CTTResearch · 6,905#71
@theelec · 10,807#72
@triple_stock · 12,879#73
@pharmbiohana · 29,843#74
@desperatestudycafe · 18,824#75
@mztanyong · 5,980#76
@bornlupin · 48,016#77
@yieldnspread · 22,030#78
@cpshelter · 5,401#79
@jeilstock · 26,472#80
@getfeed · 8,738#81
@yakjangsu · 11,443#82
@Jstockclass · 25,947#83
@choaz1 · 7,068#84
@merITz_tech · 24,008#85
@SmallCap · 23,176#86
@selfstudystock · 3,734#87
@kwtok · 9,390#88
@sypark_strategy · 29,539#89
@Korea_value · 5,488#90
@tteoksangMalangCow · 53 (as read 2 September 2026)#91
@pikachu_aje · 25,242#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@realtime_stock_news · 37,210
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,921
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@corevalue · 67,505
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,581
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@HANAchina · 35,284
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,309
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@darthacking · 65,078
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@huhpharm · 24,282
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@shmstory · 38,160
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@ym_research · 40,010
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@growthresearch · 40,127
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@kwusa · 36,528
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@SmallCap · 23,176
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,320
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,651
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@survival_DoPB · 22,243
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@pharmbiohana · 29,843
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
@gaoshoukorea · 41,159
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@TNBfolio · 24,657
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@jeilstock · 26,472
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
@GoUpstock · 20,978
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
@bumgore · 35,352
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@bufkr · 22,258
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@habit4117 · 27,854
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西” (@YeouidoStory2), 58,446 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YeouidoStory2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.