9월 증시 전략: 금리인상보다 더 중요한 것은 장기금리의 방향 https://blog.naver.com/fastest_info1/224399092182
Channel
빠르고 정확한 주식정보방
@fastest_info1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,219subscribers
+262 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001352301083 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fastest_info1 |
| Created | 31 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fastest_info1 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 13,219 | +9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 13,210 | +18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 13,192 | +7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 13,185 | +41 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 13,144 | +30 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 13,114 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:49 | 13,118 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:12 | 13,116 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:48 | 13,117 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 13,122 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 13,121 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 13,120 | +11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 13,109 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 13,107 | +11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 13,096 | +7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 13,089 | +60 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 13,029 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 13,020 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 13,017 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 13,012 | first reading |
Engagement
302 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.6%
- avg views ÷ 13,219 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,410
- 102 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 102
- of 302 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 302 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 143,464 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
미 ADP 고용, 8월에 3만 8천 명 증가... 1월 이후 최소 증가폭 2026년 8월 미국 민간 기업의 고용은 3만 8천 명 증가하며 1월 이후 가장 낮은 증가폭을 기록함. 이는 상향 조정된 7월의 4만 6천 명보다 낮은 수치이며, 예상치인 4만 7천 명에도 미치지 못해 노동 시장의 전반적인 둔화를 반영함.
프로그램 순매수 +15만에서 순식간에 -26만
안녕하세요. 알테오젠이 글로벌 Top-tier 제약사 노바티스(Novartis)와 올해 4번째 하이브로자임 플랫폼 기술 라이선스 계약을 체결하였습니다. 이번 계약의 총액은 32억 2,300만 달러(한화 약 4조 4,165억 원)로 노바티스는 복수의 바이오의약품에 대해서 ALT-B4를 활용한 피하주사 제형 개발 및 상업화할 수 있는 독점적 권리를 확보하게 됩니다. 이를 통해 하이브로자임 플랫폼의 라이선스 파트너 기업은 총 10개사(MSD, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Novartis, GSK, Biogen, Daiichi Sankyo, Sandoz, Intas, 비공개 파트너)로 확대되었습니다. 노바티스는 당사와 라이선스 계약에 앞서 다양한 모달리티(modality)에 ALT-B4를 적용한 피하주사 제형 전환에 대한 평가를 수행해 …
🚨 알테오젠, 노바티스와 최대 4.4조원 ALT-B4 계약 ✅ 호재 강도: 8/10 — 상급 호재 ▪️계약 상대: Novartis Pharma AG ▪️계약 규모: 최대 32.23억달러, 약 4조4,165억원 ▪️계약 대상: 복수의 노바티스 바이오의약품 ▪️내용: ALT-B4를 활용한 피하주사(SC) 제형 개발·상업화 ▪️추가 수익: 제품 판매에 따른 로열티 수취 🔥 긍정적인 부분 ① 단일 제품이 아닌 ‘복수 품목’ 계약 ② 글로벌 빅파마 노바티스가 ALT-B4 기술력을 재확인 ③ 최대 계약금액이 알테오젠 시총 약 21조원의 21% 수준 ④ 공시상 판매 로열티는 최대 계약금액과 별도로 추정 ⑤ 기존 산도즈 계약과 별개인 신규 빅파마 고객 확보 ⚠️ 확인해야 할 부분 ▪️4.4조원은 계약금·옵션 행사금·마일스톤을 모두 합친 최대 금액…
2026.09.02 13:26:34 기업명: 알테오젠(시가총액: 21조 10억) A196170 보고서명: 투자판단관련주요경영사항 (재조합 인간 히알루로니다제 제품 ALT-B4 독점적 옵션·라이선스 계약 체결) 제목 : 재조합 인간 히알루로니다제 제품 ALT-B4 독점적 옵션·라이선스 계약 체결 * 주요내용 ※ 투자유의사항 본 계약은 의약품규제기관의 허가가 완료되어야 이행되는 조건부 계약으로서, 본 계약을 통한 수익 인식은 임상시험과 품목허가 등의 성공 여부에 따라 달라질 수 있습니다. 계약 조건에 따라, 규제기관에 의한 연구 개발의 중단, 품목허가 실패 등 발생시 계약이 해지될 수 있습니다. 1. 계약상대방: Novartis Pharma AG (스위스) - Novartis 최근 사업연도(2025) 매출액: $54…
Dell COO 제프 클라크 : “공급 제약 요인은 여전히 똑같습니다. DRAM, DRAM, DRAM, 그리고 그다음은 NAND, NAND, NAND입니다.”
✅임상 1상에도 수조원…빅파마 기술 선점에 알지노믹스·올릭스 주목 마켓타임스 | 2026-09-02 글로벌 제약사들이 임상 초기 단계의 바이오기업을 수십억달러에 인수하며 차세대 기술 확보에 나서고 있다. 신약 허가를 기다리기보다 차별화된 작용기전과 후속 후보물질로 확장 가능한 플랫폼, 초기 인체 데이터를 선제적으로 확보하려는 전략이다. 1. 릴리, 메리다 최대 28억7500만달러 인수 릴리는 지난달 31일 메리다 바이오사이언스를 최대 28억7500만달러에 인수하는 최종 계약을 체결했다. 선급금과 조건부 마일스톤을 합산한 최대 금액이며, 거래는 올해 4분기 마무리될 예정이다. 메리다는 병원성 항체를 선택적으로 제거하는 정밀 생물학적 제제를 개발한다. 핵심 후보물질 MER511은 그레이브스병 환자 대상 임상 1상이 진행 중이며, 릴리는 …
DS 코스닥 액티브 ETF에서 이틀 연속으로 샘씨엔에스 담는중
#와이씨 - 삼성전자 HBM 증설 수혜 + 2027년까지 성장 가시성 하나증권이 보는 와이씨의 핵심은 삼성전자 HBM 투자 확대에 따라 웨이퍼 테스터 수요가 구조적으로 증가하고 있다는 점. 와이씨는 삼성전자 메모리 사업부가 주 고객이며 삼성전자 내 테스터 점유율은 약 30~40%로 추정됨. 자회사 샘씨엔에스도 프로브카드용 세라믹 기판을 공급하고 있어 본사와 자회사가 동시에 HBM 투자 확대의 수혜를 받는 구조. 가장 중요한 포인트는 수주가 실제로 크게 늘고 있다는 것. 2026년 8월 삼성전자와 1,622억원 규모 메모리 웨이퍼 테스터 공급계약을 체결했고 계약기간은 2027년 6월까지. 기존에도 930억원, 422억원 등 대형 계약이 진행 중이라 2027년 매출까지 가시성이 상당히 높아진 상황. 하나증권은 2026년 매출 3,581억원(+31…
#엠케이전자 - SoCAMM2 + 중국 성장 + 고마진 제품 확대 엠케이전자의 핵심은 단순 SoCAMM2 테마가 아니라 본업인 본딩와이어 판매량이 이미 증가하고 있는 가운데 AI 서버용 SoCAMM2와 중국 반도체 성장까지 추가로 붙는 구조라는 점. 국내 Gold Wire 판매량은 2025년 월평균 약 6만km에서 2Q26 7.5만km까지 증가했고, 중국법인도 주요 OSAT향 물량이 빠르게 늘고 있음. 현대차증권은 중국 물량이 매분기 QoQ Mid-teen 수준으로 증가하고 있다고 평가. SoCAMM2는 AI 서버용 LPDDR 패키지에 본딩와이어가 사용되기 때문에 엠케이전자가 직접적인 소재 수혜를 받을 수 있는 구조. 삼성전자·SK하이닉스 등 기존 고객사 공급망에 이미 진입해 있다는 점도 강점. 다만 4Q부터 SoCAMM2 물량이 급증한…
#엠케이전자
Showing the 12 most recent of 302 posts we hold for @fastest_info1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fastest_info1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 24 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,3093 posts급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,6511 post텐렙
@Ten_level · 17,1331 post상장기업 수사대 ☎️
@cyber_rangers · 16,9731 post미니언즈
@minionsstock · 1,4771 post너쟁이의 성실한 추추생활
@nje2e · 8,4591 post스몰인사이트리서치
@smallinsightresearch · 5,7231 post타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,3201 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@darthacking · 65,09617 posts스몰인사이트리서치
@smallinsightresearch · 5,7239 postsKK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 19,8264 posts유안타 손현정 [유틸리티(전력기기)/음식료]
@HJS_YSK · 4,2643 posts루팡
@bornlupin · 48,0163 posts[신한 리서치본부] 유틸리티/신재생
@ShinhanUtilityNewEnergy · 4,8522 posts카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 22,4832 postsDS Tech 이수림
@dssemicon · 5,4012 posts이그전 (이은택의 그림 전략)
@egzion · 22,3922 posts한화투자증권 경제 임혜윤
@lim_econ · 13,7982 posts[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 24,0082 posts대신 신성장산업 & 유틸리티
@Daishinsmc · 3,4171 post[다올 매크로/투자전략] 조병현/박영찬/정현하/홍록은
@DaolMacro · 3,0051 post한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 16,1531 post하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,2841 postGranit34의 투자스토리
@Joorini34 · 12,5991 post한투 제약/바이오 위해주
@KIS_Healthcare · 8,9251 post[한투 테크팀] 남채민/황준태/김정찬/김연준
@KISemicon · 15,1551 post김치터미널
@KimchiTerminal · 4,4191 post양파농장
@Onionfarmer · 15,9861 post[한국투자증권 염동찬] 퀀트
@TLTE8EU3QIsyMzM1 · 3,1771 post에테르의 일본&미국 리서치
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,4691 post알테오젠 IR
@alteogenIR · 9,8001 post@아무자료 아무노래(2026년, 계급사회 가속화 3.0)
@anysong_Technon · 4,9841 post[신한 리서치본부] 제약/바이오
@bio_shinhan · 21,4371 post케이씨지 디지털자산/AI/경제 뉴스
@coinkcgchannel · 18,3551 post다올투자증권 리서치센터
@daolresearch · 4,4851 post하나증권 IT 전기전자/부품 김민경
@hanaitmk · 1,8431 postPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,0751 post(촉수엄금) 프랍트레이더 전용 터미널
@hyperspect · 4,1251 post주식스타그램
@jusikstagram · 3,8641 post키움증권 해외선물 톡톡
@kwtok · 9,3901 post[미래에셋증권 채권/경제] 민지희, 정형기
@miraebond · 6,0491 post매경 자이앤트| MK
@mk_giant · 3,6661 postNH 리서치 [제약/바이오]
@nhis_bio · 4,9371 post삼성리서치 매크로 정성태
@samsung_macro · 8,0491 post[ IT는 SK ]
@skitteam · 17,9991 post[유진 디지털자산] 김세희
@ssayzzang · 1,0581 post선진짱 주식공부방
@sunstudy1234 · 54,4281 postCTRINE
@teamctrine · 7,6001 postKB/화학/배터리 전우제
@wchun0222 · 5,2791 post빚쟁이는 여의도로
@yeouidobi · 1,9791 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cahier_de_market · 22,483
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
@kimcharger · 24,877
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,581
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,320
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,921
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@easobi · 23,632
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
@realtime_stock_news · 37,253
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@pharmbiohana · 29,843
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,446
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@darthacking · 65,096
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@growthresearch · 40,127
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@habit4117 · 27,854
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@corevalue · 67,564
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@ym_research · 40,010
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,309
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@survival_DoPB · 22,275
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@awake_realtimeCheck · 22,586
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
@huhpharm · 24,282
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@bornlupin · 48,016
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@bumgore · 35,332
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@bufkr · 22,258
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@EarlyStock1 · 24,432
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
@TNBfolio · 24,668
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,469
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“빠르고 정확한 주식정보방” (@fastest_info1), 13,219 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fastest_info1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.