Channel
@Yeouido_Lab
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,371subscribers
+135 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001657785983 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Yeouido_Lab |
| Created | 19 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Yeouido_Lab |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:37 | 43,371 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 43,383 | +174 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:48 | 43,209 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 43,225 | -19 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 43,244 | +2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 43,242 | +10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 43,232 | +6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:14 | 43,226 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:29 | 43,228 | +6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 43,222 | -6 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 43,228 | -20 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 43,248 | -26 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 43,274 | -3 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 43,277 | -32 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 43,309 | +15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 43,294 | +23 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 43,271 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 43,274 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 43,277 | +12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 43,265 | first reading |
1,123 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 154 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,123 (5 August 2026 – 23 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,255,736 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 04:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10월 12일자 기사인데, 오늘 지투지바이오 행사에 박대표님 용안이 보여서 다시 리뷰해봤습니다. 혹시나.. 하는 생각이긴 하지만 지금같은 장에는 상상력으로 투자하시면 안되구요. 지투지바이오의 이희용 대표님이나 펩트론 최호일 대표님, 박순재 대표님, 오름테라퓨틱의 이승주 대표님 모두 연세인입니다. 너무 의미부여는 하지 않으려고 하긴 하나, 사실 알테오젠이 저 정도 실탄을 가지고 인수할 만한 회사가 국내에 있다면 어떤 회사일지 상상을 하게 되긴 하네요.
https://n.news.naver.com/article/015/0005341692?sid=105 "이르면 올해 말, 늦어도 내년 초에는 외부기술 도입과 M&A에 본격적으로 나설 계획" 이라고 박순재 대표는 인터뷰에서 언급. 코스닥 대장주인 알테오젠은 새 성장동력 사업으로 장기지속형 약물전달 기술확보를 우선검토할 계획이다.
박순재 대표님 용안(?)이 보이네요.
안녕하세요. 지투지바이오입니다. 금일 지투지바이오 오송 본사에서 진행된 ‘2026 청송학술제’ 현장 사진을 공유드립니다. 약 45명이 참석한 이번 행사에서 지투지바이오는 미립구 생산시설을 공개하고, 미립구의 제조 및 생산 과정을 소개했습니다. 참석자들과 장기지속형 제제 기술에 대해 다양한 의견을 나누고, 바이오 연구 생태계 활성화와 발전 방향을 함께 모색하는 뜻깊은 자리였습니다. 감사합니다.
안녕하세요, 한미 IR그룹입니다. 한미약품의 차세대 삼중작용 비만 신약 후보물질 HM15275(LA-GLP/GIP/GCG)의 WHO 국제일반명(rINN)*이 ‘잔트루타이드(zantrutide)’로 공식 등재됐습니다. WHO INN프로그램은 전세계 의약품 성분의 표준 명칭을 부여하는 제도입니다. 이번 HM15275(잔트루타이드, zantrutide)의 국제일반명 등재는 글로벌 수준의 개발자산으로서 인지도를 강화하고, 신약 후보로서 위상을 높여나가는 과정에서 의미가 큽니다. 한미약품은 연구 개발을 지속하며 잔트루타이드의 체중감량과 근손실 최소화 측면에서 Best in class 잠재력을 증명해 나간다는 목표입니다. ✅'잔트루타이드(zantrutide)' 이름의 의미 ▪️ zan : Best+Balance를 상징하는 접두사 ▪️ tru …
(중략) 13. 결론적으로, '25년 글로벌 기준 환자수 5,500명으로 침투율 30%로만 계산해도, NLY01의 보라시데닙 병용으로 나오는 매출은 약 $82.5M(연간 약가 $50,000 기준) ~ 165M(연간 약가 $100,000 기준). 14. 뚜렷한 mPFS와 Tumor Regression만 잘 입증돼도 NLY01의 생각지도 못한 꽤나 유의미한 매출을 맞이할 수도 있을 듯. (중략) 16. 비만/대사에서는 포스트 GLP-1을 찾고 있지만, 아직도 비만에서 GLP-1은 넘버원이고, 비만/대사를 넘어 GLP-1의 쓰임새(?)는 여전히 우리몸 전반에 확장 중이며, NLY01 뿐만 아니라 여러 기회가 계속 열려 있을 것 같음. https://blog.naver.com/freedomfromsalary/224451333244
https://m.newspim.com/news/view/20261023000405
알지노믹스, 릴리서 4회차 연구비 수령…유전성 난청 공동연구 순항 https://www.hankyung.com/article/202610230800i
#지투지바이오 장기지속형 주사제에서 유일하게 성과내고 있는 회사라서 혼자 독자플레이로 가는데 전환사채 애들 750억 풋옵션이 27년 1월에 가능합니다. 얘네 단가가 64200원인데 과연 올려서 받아먹느냐 이게 또 우리가 관전포인트로 지켜보면 되겠습니다.
2026.10.23 11:17:33 기업명: 한솔아이원스(시가총액: 3,276억) A114810 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 매출액 : 650억(예상치 : 636억+/ 2%) 영업익 : 124억(예상치 : 139억/ -11%) 순이익 : 96억(예상치 : 121억/ -21%) **최근 실적 추이** 2026.3Q 650억/ 124억/ 96억 2026.2Q 537억/ 66억/ 52억 2026.1Q 492억/ 71억/ 54억 2025.4Q 517억/ 29억/ 39억 2025.3Q 512억/ 94억/ 64억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20261023900330 종목공시 : https://www.awakeplus.co.kr/disclosure/114810
메타의 새로운 AI 서비스 'Muse', 초기 이용자 유입보다 유지율(Retention)이 문제. 모건스탠리가 Sensor Tower 데이터를 활용해 비교한 결과, 메타의 Muse는 설치 첫날 이용자 유지율이 **73%**로 구글(61%), 인스타그램(68%), 페이스북(55%)보다 높았음. 그러나 시간이 지나면서 상황이 역전. 설치 7일 후 유지율은 30%, 14일 후에는 **23%**까지 하락. 반면 구글은 52%, 인스타그램은 54%를 유지. 이는 초기 호기심을 실제 일상적 사용 습관으로 전환하는 데 어려움을 겪고 있다는 신호. 모건스탠리는 제품 혁신을 통해 반복 사용을 유도할 여지가 있다고 평가. 투자 관점에서는 AI 서비스의 경쟁력이 단순 다운로드나 이용자 확보에서 사용 빈도와 유지율, 궁극적으로 수익화 능력으로 이동하고 있다…
한국은 언제 열리려나...
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,123 posts we hold for @Yeouido_Lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 175 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기” (@Yeouido_Lab), 43,371 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yeouido_Lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.