깡토와 광란의 추세추종, 가치투자, 시스템트레이딩
1. 이 채널 게재된 내용들은 언론보도, 관련 리포트 등을 참고하여 작성이므로 사실과 일치하지 않을수 있습니다.
2.이 채널에 게재된 내용들은 투자에 참고로만 활용하시기 바라며, 어떠한 경우에도 투자 결과에 법적책임 등의 판단근거로 사용될 수 없습니다
3.이 채널에 언급된 종목들은 언제든지 예고없이 매도하거나 매수할수 있습니다
Created
4 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net +119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,162–20,331 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 07:08
20,311
+2
29 Aug 2026, 03:53
20,309
+7
28 Aug 2026, 04:23
20,302
+12
27 Aug 2026, 00:44
20,290
-3
26 Aug 2026, 02:16
20,293
-1
25 Aug 2026, 03:34
20,294
-2
23 Aug 2026, 17:58
20,296
+8
22 Aug 2026, 01:17
20,288
+7
20 Aug 2026, 18:03
20,281
-3
19 Aug 2026, 19:18
20,284
+7
18 Aug 2026, 22:24
20,277
-10
17 Aug 2026, 22:55
20,287
+3
16 Aug 2026, 19:45
20,284
+4
15 Aug 2026, 08:16
20,280
+45
14 Aug 2026, 00:13
20,235
-1
12 Aug 2026, 16:14
20,236
+44
11 Aug 2026, 18:12
20,192
+8
10 Aug 2026, 18:05
20,184
-8
9 Aug 2026, 17:42
20,192
+3
8 Aug 2026, 17:39
20,189
first reading
Engagement
346 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.08%
avg views ÷ 20,311 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,840
346 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.356%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
346
of 346 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 243 of 346 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
346 (5 August 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
638,082
Reactions total
1,763
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,120
Videos
≈19
Links
≈7,150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,730 reactions across 226 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
802
46.4%
👍
615
35.5%
😡
68
3.93%
👏
48
2.77%
😭
45
2.60%
😁
31
1.79%
💯
30
1.73%
🔥
29
1.68%
🤔
21
1.21%
😱
13
0.751%
😢
7
0.405%
👀
6
0.347%
🤣
6
0.347%
🍾
5
0.289%
⚡
3
0.173%
💔
1
0.058%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 243 of the 346 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,763reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 346 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[장전브리핑] 미 기술주 숨고르기·유가 상승 속 환율 안정, 한국 증시 혼조세 전망
• 미 나스닥 조정 및 국채 금리 상승. 반도체 대형주(삼성전자·SK하이닉스) 외국인 수급 부담 우려.
• 국제 유가 상승(WTI 84.93달러). 정유·화학(S-Oil, SK이노베이션) 수익성 개선 기대.
• 원유 가격 강세 및 해양 플랜트 발주 기대. 조선·중공업(HD한국조선해양) 모멘텀.
• 원/달러 환율 소폭 하락 안정. 외국인 수급 이탈 우려 완화 기대.
• 중국 PMI 발표 대기. 아시아 증시 투자심리 영향 가능성.
🔗 https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/briefing/254
[美증시 마감] B2B 테크·에너지 주도 정배열 속 선별적 로테이션 장세
• B2B 소프트웨어, 에너지, 금융 섹터로 자금 유입. 고금리 속 안정적 현금흐름 기업 선별.
• 10년물 국채 금리 상승으로 고평가 성장주 부담. 기술주 내부 모멘텀 둔화.
• ESTC, MPC, TEAM, KB, PSX 등 신고가 종목 주목. B2B AI, 정유, 금융 대형주 강세.
• 한국 영향: 정유, 금융지주, B2B IT 솔루션 대표주 중심 차별화 대응 필요.
🔗 https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/us/briefing
[장마감브리핑] 외국인 2.1조원 순매도에 KOSPI 하락 마감
• 외국인 2.1조 원 순매도, 반도체 대형주 집중 출하로 KOSPI 하락 마감.
• K-컬처 및 화장품 섹터, 실적 모멘텀과 52주 신고가 속출하며 5.14% 급등. 한국콜마, 코스메카코리아 등 신고가 경신.
• 달러/원 환율 7.35원 하락, 원화 강세에도 외국인 매도세 억제 역부족.
• 화학/소재 및 소비재 섹터 반등, S-Oil 9.1% 상승. 삼양식품 등도 강세.
• 미국 잭슨홀 심포지엄 앞두고 글로벌 자금 관망세.
🔗 https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/briefing/253
제가 프로 유튜버가 아니잖아요 ㅋㅋㅋ
멤버십 같은 것을 하는 것도 아니고요.
그래서 저는 2주에 한 번 스튜디오에 가서
한 번에 4편 이상을 찍습니다.
어제 올라온 화장품 관련 영상도
실제로는 8월 20일에 촬영한 영상이에요.
https://youtu.be/TOBWdLOCqDo?si=_a0YoTgp3Eq0mIlx
당연히 시의성 있게 바로바로 찍어서 올리면 좋겠죠.
그런데 그렇게 할 시간도 없고,
그렇게까지 해야 한다면 저는 그냥 안 할 것 같아요.
그 시간에 제가 하고 싶은 일을 하는 게 더 중요하니까요.
사람마다 중요하게 생각하는 것은 다 다르다고 생각합니다.
제가 전업투자를 하는 것도
금전적인 여유도 중요하지만,
저는 그보다 시간적인 여유를 더 중요하게 생각했어요.
인생은 짧잖아요.
돈을 많이 버는 것도 중요하지만
그 돈과 …
Showing the 12 most recent of 346 posts we hold for @maddingStock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 178,843 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“스탁이지 - AI 투자 어시스턴트” (@maddingStock), 20,311 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maddingStock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.