https://aurda.im/bumsong/board/1382?list=%2Fbumsong%2Fcolumn

Channel
범송공자 X 29PER
@bumsong2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,470subscribers
+383 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001564582698 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bumsong2 |
| Created | 12 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bumsong2 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:59 | 13,470 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:51 | 13,477 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:21 | 13,484 | +6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:09 | 13,478 | +7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 13,471 | +55 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:31 | 13,416 | +184 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 13,232 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 13,234 | +1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 13,233 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:14 | 13,237 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 13,238 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:39 | 13,242 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 13,248 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:15 | 13,254 | -7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 13,261 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 13,263 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 13,261 | +8 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 13,253 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 05:50 | 13,258 | +7 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:05 | 13,251 | first reading |
Engagement
576 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.13%
- avg views ÷ 13,470 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,090
- 56 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.176%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 56
- of 576 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 576 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 61,312 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
532 reactions across 226 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 390 | 73.3% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 17.1% | |
| 😱 | 28 | 5.26% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 2.63% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 244 of the 576 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 532 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 576 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 56 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
2026.11.04.수 테마맵입니다🔥 편하게 공유해 주세요! 📣29PER (https://t.me/twentynineper) '테마맵'은 '상승률'과 함께 '높은 거래량'을 우선시하여 제작하였기에 비교적 정확하게 당일 시장의 주도 섹터 및 종목을 확인할 수 있습니다
Signed hello
📅 2026-11-05 일정 실적발표 1) 美) 실적발표 : 에어비앤비, 폴로랄프로렌 해외 지표 1) 日) 일본은행(BOJ) 금융정책결정회의 의사록 2) 영국) 영란은행(BOE) 기준금리 결정 (한국시간 11/5 21:00) 3) 美) 주간 신규 실업수당 청구건수 4) 유로존) 9월 생산자물가지수(PPI) 5) 독일) 9월 공장수주 6) 美) 3분기 비농업부문 노동생산성 잠정치 (한국시간 11/5 22:30) 7) 日) 10월 제조업 PMI 확정치 기타 1) 공모청약 : 제논, 옵토닉스, 영광와이케이엠씨 2) 공모청약 : 옵토닉스, 영광와이케이엠씨 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🗓 다가오는 일정 11/6(금) · 美) 10월 고용동향보고서 ⚡ (한국시간 11/6 22:30) · 공모청약 : 에이엘로봇, 옵토닉스 · 시프트업…
👍1
Signed hello
📝. 민주당 승리 시 메모리 가격 점진적 하락 전망 Disclaimer: 면책고지, 모든 메세지는 벡터 기반 분산 표상형으로 작성 등의 사유로 착오가 발생할 수 있음. 모든 투자 책임은 투자자 본인에게 일체 귀속됨. (증권사 채널 등 100개 추가하기) DEMOCRATIC VICTORY LIKELY TO DRIVE GRADUAL DECLINE IN MEMORY PRICES, ANALYSTS SAY 코멘트: 미국 정치 변동이 반도체 수급과 가격에 미치는 영향은 정책·보조금·무역 규제 경로를 통해 구조적으로 전이된다. 선거 결과가 메모리 가격에 대한 기대를 바꾸는 것은 글로벌 밸류체인의 정치적 리스크 프리미엄이 재조정되는 신호로, 향후 공급망 다변화와 재고 전략의 패러다임 전환을 예고한다. #메모리반도체 #미국정치 #공급망 #가격전망 #밸…
📝. 테슬라·스페이스X 주가, 중간선거 민주당 압승에 초반 타격 Disclaimer: 면책고지, 모든 메세지는 벡터 기반 분산 표상형으로 작성 등의 사유로 착오가 발생할 수 있음. 모든 투자 책임은 투자자 본인에게 일체 귀속됨. (증권사 채널 등 100개 추가하기) TESLA, SPACEX SHARES TAKE EARLY HIT AS MIDTERM BLUE WAVE UNFOLDS - BBG 코멘트: 중간선거 결과가 특정 기업의 정치적 리스크로 직결되는 구조는 미국 정책 환경이 산업별 이해관계에 따라 분절되고 있음을 보여준다. 민주당의 규제 기조 강화는 전기차 보조금과 우주·통신 사업 인허가 등에서 기존 수혜 기업의 밸류에이션 재조정을 강제할 수 있다. #테슬라 #스페이스X #미국중간선거 #규제리스크 #주가변동 Gemini 기반 추가 조…
📝. 미 민주당, 하원·상원 동시 탈환... 의회 통제권 확보 Disclaimer: 면책고지, 모든 메세지는 벡터 기반 분산 표상형으로 작성 등의 사유로 착오가 발생할 수 있음. 모든 투자 책임은 투자자 본인에게 일체 귀속됨. (증권사 채널 등 100개 추가하기) BREAKING🇺🇸 DEMOCRATS WIN BOTH THE US HOUSE AND SENATE, SEIZING CONTROL FROM REPUBLICANS. 코멘트: 의회 양원 장악은 입법 의제와 예산 심사권의 향방을 바꾸는 구조적 분기점이다. 행정부와 의회의 상하원 구성이 어긋날 경우 대외 정책의 이행 속도와 협상 지렛대에도 2차 파급이 발생한다. #미국중간선거 #민주당 #하원 #상원 #의회통제권 Gemini 기반 추가 조사🔍 (Insight: @hyperspect | …
👍2
https://aurda.im/bumsong/board/1370?list=%2Fbumsong%2Fcolumn
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 576 posts we hold for @bumsong2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@hyperspect · 4,581170 posts29PER
@twentynineper · 5,20799 posts하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,27915 postsAWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 65,5775 posts[ IT는 SK ]
@skitteam · 18,2753 posts급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,9452 posts딘스티커 Dean's Ticker
@d_ticker · 16,0482 posts주식소리통 NEO by Bilanx Research
@davidstocknew · 17,2512 posts한국투자증권/기관영업부/이민근
@mk81_koreainvestment · 16,6222 posts[미래에셋 ETF/파생] 윤재홍
@qooowooo · 6,7032 postsHS아카데미 대표 이효석
@HS_academy · 36,1291 post[삼성 이영진] 글로벌 AI/SW
@Samsung_Global_AI_SW · 12,6691 postTNBfolio
@TNBfolio · 25,1181 post대신증권 원자재 최진영
@akacommodity · 5,2351 post선수촌
@athletes_village · 22,1161 post루팡
@bornlupin · 49,1721 post카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,0371 postDAJU - 기업 공시
@daju_dart · 4,5711 post이그전 (이은택의 그림 전략)
@egzion · 22,8661 post사제콩이_서상영
@ehdwl · 32,1021 post재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,2161 post미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 73,7671 post쫑이밥그릇팔아알트사기
@jjonge1219 · 2,1151 post[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 24,6351 post[미래에셋 에너지/정유화학] 이진호
@miraeoillee · 7,0461 post신한 리서치
@shinhanresearch · 21,8181 postCTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,1431 post야자반 - Y.Z. stock
@yaza_stock · 13,0621 postYIELD & SPREAD
@yieldnspread · 22,0731 postYM리서치
@ym_research · 39,8861 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@hyperspect · 4,581170 postsMarket News Feed
@marketfeed · 39,638163 posts29PER
@twentynineper · 5,20718 postsFirst Squawk
@firstsquaw · 3,8015 posts[ IT는 SK ]
@skitteam · 18,2753 postsWalter Bloomberg
@WalterBloomberg · 33,6813 posts주식소리통 NEO by Bilanx Research
@davidstocknew · 17,2512 posts[신한 리서치본부] 화장품/의복
@shinhanconsumer · 1,8511 postTNBfolio
@TNBfolio · 25,1181 postWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 631,1231 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@merITz_tech · 24,635
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
@SmallCap · 23,016
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
@sunstudy1111 · 55,137
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@HANAchina · 35,279
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@cahier_de_market · 23,037
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
@ym_research · 39,886
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@Jstockclass · 26,465
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@shmstory · 39,558
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@corevalue · 67,155
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@kwusa · 36,258
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@darthacking · 65,577
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@rafikiresearch · 20,646
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@realtime_stock_news · 36,999
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,014
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@awake_realtimeCheck · 22,877
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
@growthresearch · 40,142
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@TNBfolio · 25,118
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@habit4117 · 28,222
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,437
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,281
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@globaletfi · 20,550
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,945
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,931
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@GoUpstock · 21,027
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“범송공자 X 29PER” (@bumsong2), 13,470 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bumsong2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.