살 것인가 팔 것인가 버틸것인가 목대균 KCGI 대표 신간 https://m.blog.naver.com/kinvestors/224393288601
👍5❤1

Channel
@small_stock
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,084subscribers
-221 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002138524075 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @small_stock |
| Created | 11 May 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/small_stock |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 9,084 | -27 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 9,111 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 9,132 | -32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 9,164 | -40 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 9,204 | -42 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 9,246 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 9,250 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 9,269 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 9,295 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 9,305 | first reading |
78 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 64 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 78 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 119,965 |
| Reactions total | 966 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,202 reactions across 75 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 281 | 23.4% | |
| 🔥 | 260 | 21.6% | |
| ❤ | 246 | 20.5% | |
| 👏 | 198 | 16.5% | |
| 😁 | 53 | 4.41% | |
| 🤔 | 43 | 3.58% | |
| 🥰 | 28 | 2.33% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 1.66% | |
| 🤬 | 18 | 1.50% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 1.08% | |
| 🤷♂ | 12 | 0.998% | |
| 🤷♀ | 6 | 0.499% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.416% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.333% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.25% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.25% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.25% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.166% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.083% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.083% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.166% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
살 것인가 팔 것인가 버틸것인가 목대균 KCGI 대표 신간 https://m.blog.naver.com/kinvestors/224393288601
👍5❤1
블로거 투로님 GRT를 새로 커버하는 블로거분들이 많아지고 있다 투자 포인트 설득이 되고 있다는 의미 아닐까 각각의 자료 하나만 보면 결정적인 증거가 아닐 수 있다. 하지만 시간순으로 보면 23년 MLCC 이형필름 관련 특허 등록 → 회사공시에서 상품화 실현 → 25,000톤 MLCC,광학급 PET 프로젝트 건설 → 26년 시운전 및 준공 검수 → MLCC 이형필름 단체표준 제정 참여 라는 흐름이 생긴다. 그래서 나는 현재까지 확인한 Q 증가와 3공장의 성장 여력을 보면 GRT를 긍정적으로 본다. 결국 다음 단계에서 확인할 것은 단순하다. 영업이익의 증가가 실제 지배주주순이익과 EPS 증가로 이어지는가. 이것까지 확인된다면 지금의 낮은 밸류에이션은 앞으로 다시 보기 어려운 구간이 될 수도 있지 않을까? https://m.blog.nav…
👏7
이번에 ai로 tool을 만들면서 느꼈지만, ai tool을 '잘 만든다고 수익률이 좋을 수 없다' 오히려 ai tool을 잘 만들수록 '공부해야하는 양은 늘어난다.' ai tool은 인풋에 필요한 정보의 수집과 선별에 들어가는 시간을 줄여주는 것이지, 그걸 내 것으로 만들고 내 의사결정에 녹여내는 것은 순전히 내몫이다. 판단을 ai에 의탁하는 순간, 지속가능성이 사라진다. 결국 시스템의 구축은 역설적으로 인풋에 투하하는 시간을 늘리기 위함이지, 인풋에 투하하는 시간을 줄이기 위함이 아니다. 정보의 수집과 선별에 들어가던 시간을 인풋에 때려박는 시간으로 바꾸는 과정이지, 절대로 경험이나 지식으로 치환해주지 못한다. 그리고 시스템을 구축하는 과정에서 결국 평소에 이것저것 많이 해보고 불편함을 느껴본 사람이 압도적으로 유리하다. 왜냐면 본인…
👍9❤1🔥1
>>중국 일평균 토큰 호출량 500조 개 돌파 •인공지능 응용이 빠르게 확산되면서 올해 6월 기준 중국의 일평균 토큰 호출량이 500조 개를 돌파했음. 글로벌 대형 모델 경쟁이 치열해지면서 연산력 수요도 폭발적으로 증가하고 있으며, 중국 대형 모델은 글로벌 경쟁에서 1군에 진입했음. •현재 AI 플래그십 모델은 거의 월 단위로 업데이트되고 있으며, 경쟁의 초점은 단순한 ‘모델 지능’에서 에이전트의 실제 적용과 생태계 구축으로 전환되고 있음. AI는 ‘대화할 수 있는 것’에서 ‘일을 할 수 있는 것’으로 발전하면서 에이전트가 대규모로 적용되고 있고, 검색·컨텍스트 확인·도구 호출·다중 피드백 등으로 추론 연산력 수요가 폭발하고 있음. •연산력 자원을 확보하기 위해 인터넷 대형 업체들은 AI 지능형 연산센터 구축을 가속화하고 장기 협력 계약…
❤3👍1🔥1
서플러스글로벌대표님 글을 잘 쓰시네요 https://www.forbeskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=402454
👍3
스디커신소재 실적 발표와 GRT 리레이팅 관련 영상 올렸습니다 GRT 매출 절반인데 시총 6.7조.... https://youtu.be/3JJ4ini-U-4?si=iFc-eEMqEhXZDAXG
❤11🔥3
엔터, 그 시간이 오고 있다 https://m.blog.naver.com/jp187/224391602856
🥰4🤣1🤪1
주가 상승을 위하여 임원진과 주주들이 건배한 적은 처음입니다 새롭네요 아마도 한국 증시에 상장된 중국주식 중에는 가장 주주친화적이지 않을까요 https://youtu.be/mvsl7dwuLaw?si=EwNwL4IT2PFIxoDG
🔥8👏4🤬1
제조업은 정직하다 경쟁력 있게 만들면 무조건 돈을 번다
🔥14
딥시크 등 중국 ai 성장 - 낭조정보 등 ai 서버 성장 - grt ai서버 그래핀 방열(화웨이와 개발 협업 중), 탄소포집 나노다공정(대만 연구진과 공동 개발 중국 최초 특허 및 증설 중) 성장 흐름
👍9🔥2
>>DeepSeek, 올해 7개월 매출 4억7,500만 위안, 전년비 약 10배 증가, API 매출총이익률 82.9% •DeepSeek의 올해 첫 7개월 매출은 약 4억7,500만 위안으로 YoY 약 10배 증가했으며, API 매출총이익률은 82.9%에 달했음. 순손실은 7억1,500만 위안으로 축소. 회사는 높은 매출총이익률과 가성비를 앞세운 가격 인상 전략을 바탕으로 현재 5,000억 위안의 기업가치를 기준으로 500억 위안 규모의 신규 라운드 자금조달을 추진하고 있으며, 내년 상하이 상장을 준비하고 있음 >报道:DeepSeek前七个月营收4.75亿元、同比增长10倍,API毛利率达82.9% https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3780340#from=ios
👍5❤1🤔1
미친 뉴비가 방금 올린 글 블로거 우유결단 분석글이 예사롭지 않다고 생각했는데 나름 이 종목 고인물인데 이제 뉴비 분들에게 자리 내줘야할 듯 분석능력 미쳤음 https://m.blog.naver.com/hanchi42/224390721612
🔥8🤣4🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @small_stock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“소투” (@small_stock), 9,084 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/small_stock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.