『“세입자 보호를 위한 제도적 장치가 마련돼 있고, 보유세 인상이 세입자에게 전가되기에는 구조적으로 어려운 측면이 있다”고 해명했다.』 → 역사적으로, 학문적으로 전가가 된다는게 다 증명이 된 이야기인데 '안된다'는 말만 있지 '어떻게' 안되는지에 대한 설명은 일언반구도 없다. https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/666/0000118118
🤬3

Channel
@funkyclinic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,923subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001168452602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @funkyclinic |
| Created | 16 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/funkyclinic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 3,923 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:33 | 3,928 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 3,935 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 3,936 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 3,937 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 3,931 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 3,934 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 3,936 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 3,940 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 3,941 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 3,941 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
67 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 19.4% | |
| 🤬 | 12 | 17.9% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 10.4% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 8.96% | |
| 😇 | 6 | 8.96% | |
| 😡 | 6 | 8.96% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 8.96% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 7.46% | |
| 🤪 | 3 | 4.48% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
『“세입자 보호를 위한 제도적 장치가 마련돼 있고, 보유세 인상이 세입자에게 전가되기에는 구조적으로 어려운 측면이 있다”고 해명했다.』 → 역사적으로, 학문적으로 전가가 된다는게 다 증명이 된 이야기인데 '안된다'는 말만 있지 '어떻게' 안되는지에 대한 설명은 일언반구도 없다. https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/666/0000118118
🤬3
개정이유: 소득 재분배 효과 제고
🤣3🤬2
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/417/0001154185
🤯1
드럼통119님 제작 https://x.com/freeisneverfree
💯6👏5🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤪3
https://x.com/d_sekhar_14/status/2081425136817959375?s=46 25일 기준 유튜브 채널 'EBS 지식'에 올라왔던 '열심히 돈 벌어서 망했다 돈 준다고 좋아했는데 나도 모르는 사이에 내 돈이 다 빠져나가고 있던 이유' 영상은 시청할 수 없는 상태다. 영상은 게시 당시 섬네일에 '돈을 뿌려서 정부가 돈을 버는 방법'이라는 문구를 사용했다가 이후 '정부가 돈을 나눠 줬는데 내가 가난해지는 이유'로 변경됐다.
😡3❤1
https://www.pennmike.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=124432
https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20260726032100530?input=tw
https://www.newsis.com/view/NISX20260724_0003721471 "중랑구 등 일부 중저가 지역에서는 15억원 이하 아파트를 찾는 수요가 한정된 매물에 집중" "최근 서울 집값 상승은 신혼부부 등이 많이 찾는 15억원 이하 중저가 아파트에서 나타나고 있다" "정작 10억원 이하 주택이 안정돼야 하는데 초고가 주택을 규제한다고 해서 15억원 이하 주택까지 안정될지는 의문"
관상은 사이언스…
🤬7❤3👌3
요즘에 이 채널에서 '도적떼' 얘기를 자주 하고 있습니다. 도적떼 얘기가 괜히 나오는게 아니라 이런 사고방식을 가진 사람들이 생각보다 많이 있기 때문에 그렇습니다. 정신 바짝 차리지 않으면 도적떼에게 당하게 됩니다. 대한민국에서 인간의 평등권이 최대치로 발휘되는 곳은 선관위 투표소의 기표대 안이고 저런 생각을 하는 사람들도 밖에서나 동물 취급을 받지 그 안에서만큼은 똑같이 한 표라는 점을 잊어서는 곤란합니다.
😇6😡3❤1
https://x.com/iPaulCanada/status/2079981184717652150?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @funkyclinic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“스크랩 by 훵키클리닉” (@funkyclinic), 3,923 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/funkyclinic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.