말이 좋아 선납이지 삥 아닌가...😳 https://n.news.naver.com/article/023/0003996421

Channel
최선생네 반지하
@guroguru
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,335subscribers
-66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001388542369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @guroguru |
| Created | 28 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/guroguru |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 15,335 | +8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 15,327 | -12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 15,339 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 15,340 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 15,337 | -13 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 15,350 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 15,353 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 15,356 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:25 | 15,350 | +12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:04 | 15,338 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 15,340 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 15,339 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 15,343 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 15,347 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 15,348 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 15,349 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 15,354 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 15,358 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 15,362 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 15,360 | first reading |
Engagement
124 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.1%
- avg views ÷ 15,335 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,150
- 45 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 45
- of 124 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 124 (31 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 186,820 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
『일본은 현재 막대한 정부 보조금을 투입하며 반도체 왕국의 부활을 꿈꾸고 있습니다. 이미 세계 최고 수준인 일본의 소부장 역량에 한국의 첨단 팹이 더해진다면, 이는 곧 완벽한 일본 내 반도체 생태계의 완성을 의미합니다. 강력한 경쟁국의 반도체 부활을 우리 손으로 돕는 것은 대한민국 반도체 산업과 국운을 훼손하는 자충수입니다.』 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/ranking/article/047/0002527583
『그래서 지금 필요한 질문은 “여기가 바닥인가”가 아니다. “이 회사의 ROIC는 어디에서 나오고 있는가” “그들이 치르는 돈의 값은 앞으로 어떻게 될 것인가” 이것을 생각해야 한다.』 좋은 내용입니다. https://n.news.naver.com/article/262/0000019661
순위가 중요한 건 아니지만... https://n.news.naver.com/article/001/0016286503?sid=101
패밀리 비즈니스 https://n.news.naver.com/article/023/0003996300?sid=102
『사람들은 완벽한 평등을 원하는 게 아니다. 노력과 결과 사이에 최소한의 개연성을 원한다. 그 개연성이 끊기면 두 종류의 인간만 남게 된다. 1. 게임을 아예 포기하는 사람 2. 게임의 승자를 적으로 규정하는 사람』 https://m.blog.naver.com/psung6/224398559922
https://v.daum.net/v/20260902105509143
『정부 고위 관계자는 "과도한 세제혜택을 바꾸려고 이월 금지, 만기 제한 등을 넣었으나 이해관계자가 1400만명을 넘어가면서 원안 발표 첫날부터 엄청난 반발이 있었다"면서 "이런 식이면 앞으로 불합리한 세제혜택을 조정하는 일은 거의 못하게 될 것 같다"고 토로했다.』 → 세제를 너희가 만들었지 우리가 만들었니? 👊😊 https://www.mk.co.kr/news/economy/12141575
«전석 매진 상황에서도 장애인석이 비어 있는 경우가 잦아지자 일각에서는 "이용자가 없다면 상영 직전 일반 관객에게 개방하거나 좌석 수 자체를 줄여야 한다"는 주장을 펴고 있다.» → 아이맥스 안 가본 사람들이 주로 저런 소리 하는데... 1열부터 3열까지는 돈 받고 앉아서 영화 보라고 해도 앉으면 안되는 자리입니다. (추가) 물론 그런 자리만 [장애인석]이라고 딱지를 붙여서 돈 받고 파는 CGV도 상당히 문제가 있죠. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20260831151600505
『재건축 기대감이 기존 아파트 가격에 먼저 반영된 뒤 공사비와 금융비용이 오르면서 재건축의 가격 이점이 줄어드는 사례가 잇따르고 있다. 현재 구축 매입가격에 예상 분담금을 더하면 인근 신축이나 준신축 가격과 비슷해지는 단지도 나오고 있다.』 https://n.news.naver.com/article/366/0001189483?sid=101
https://www.huffingtonpost.kr/article/259990
본인보다 훨씬 더 낮은 기수의 후배가 부총리 급으로 올라가면서 원래 박혀있던 노털이 체면이 상해 어쩔 수 없이 제 발로 걸어나가는 지극히 한국적인 방식으로 퇴장. https://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0101_202609010940174122
Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @guroguru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@songjongsik · 18,1675 posts블루버드_장기우상향 투자공부방
@longtermgrowth · 3864 posts일본주식담당
@mytokyooffice · 1,3644 posts스크랩 by 훵키클리닉
@funkyclinic · 3,9093 posts뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,7512 posts후상의 인사이트 저장소
@gngntkd · 4152 posts시간을 BULL리다
@pick_and_hold · 642 posts취업과 커리어 앞에 선 MZ둘리
@MZDooly · 71 post양파농장
@Onionfarmer · 15,9861 post케이피의 W3
@WalktoNextW · 6741 post비지뉴스의 이것저것입니다
@busynewsinvest · 1601 post가치투자클럽
@corevalue · 67,5641 post라선의 고등교육 뉴스클리핑
@daehaknews · 1461 postHAMS INVESTMENT
@hamsinvestment · 81 post투자자윤의 투자일지
@invetyun · 6,4621 post잠실개미&10X’s N.E.R.D.S
@jake8lee · 17,2771 post마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,7981 post㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,1201 postOllie’s Newscrap
@olliesnewscrap · 481 post🐋 오르카 알파 정보방 : ORCA ALPHA Main
@orcaalpha · 1,5101 post주식과 부동산
@slowstockT · 3,8451 post돌다리🚦
@stbridgee · 4,6791 post오늘 공부 노트!
@todaystudynote · 2631 postvanishing
@vanisher · 21 postVine Street Bets
@vinestreet · 6171 post곽봉효의 경제적 카테나치오 형성
@ydygod · 1,8451 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“최선생네 반지하” (@guroguru), 15,335 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guroguru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.