Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,433–8,650 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 14:37
8,458
-25
12 Sept 2026, 12:17
8,483
-20
8 Sept 2026, 13:19
8,503
-22
3 Sept 2026, 09:15
8,525
-10
31 Aug 2026, 06:44
8,535
-8
28 Aug 2026, 00:16
8,543
-8
24 Aug 2026, 15:39
8,551
-18
20 Aug 2026, 16:21
8,569
-10
18 Aug 2026, 02:22
8,579
-5
15 Aug 2026, 05:55
8,584
-7
12 Aug 2026, 02:52
8,591
-19
9 Aug 2026, 07:11
8,610
-10
6 Aug 2026, 14:01
8,620
-5
6 Aug 2026, 03:01
8,625
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:36
8,625
first reading
Engagement
132 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.29%
avg views ÷ 8,458 subscribers
Avg views / post
447
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.474%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 132 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
132 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
14,306
Reactions total
31
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
54 reactions across 29 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
39
72.2%
👍
10
18.5%
😁
3
5.56%
🔥
2
3.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[DeFi] Pendle
펜들(Pendle)이 Boros x Gate CrossEx 재정거래 도구의 첫 실제 사용 사례를 공개했습니다.
한 사용자가 약 $346,000의 자금으로 28일간 약 37%의 고정 APR(수익 약 $9,800)을 실현한 뒤 새로운 포지션으로 자금을 롤오버했습니다.
새로운 포지션은 각각 26% 고정 금리($295,000 자본, 28일 만기) 및 9.94% 고정 APR로 구성되었습니다.
출처 · ☆ 6/10
DeFi News Summary
2026-08-28 09:00 KST
[PerpDEX]
- GRVT: GRVT 거래 수수료 리베이트 구조 개편 링크
- RWAPerps: RWAPerp 베타 웨이브 1 및 얼리 액세스 출시 링크
- GRVT: GRVT, 9개 신규 마켓 상장 링크
- Variational: Variational, MRNA 무기한 선물 상장 링크
- Ondo Perps: Ondo Perps MRVL 및 NVDA 보상 안내 링크
- Hotstuff: Hotstuff 플랫폼 소개 링크
- Ondo Perps: Ondo Perps 플랫폼 개요 및 특징 안내 링크
[DeFi]
- Ondo: Ondo, Tempo 네트워크에 USDY 공식 출시 링크
- Pendle: 수익률 업데이트 링크
[Chain]
- Arc: Arc 개발자 문서 …
DeFi News Summary
2026-08-27 09:00 KST
[PerpDEX]
- RiseX: RISEx, RWA 거래량 순위 및 20% 포인트 부스트 이벤트 안내 링크
- Ondo Perps: Ondo Perps, 토큰화 주식 및 ETF 담보 기능 출시 링크
- TxFlow: TxFlow, $SOXS 무기한 선물 상장 링크
[DeFi]
- Tria: Tria 시즌 3 미스터리 박스 오픈 안내 링크
- APYx: 수익률 업데이트 링크
- Ondo: Ondo Stocks, 0x 및 Matcha와 통합 링크
[Chain]
- Arc: Arc, Chainlink 통합으로 설계 역량 강화 링크
- Arc: Arc, Ledger 파트너십 발표 링크
- Arc: Circle StableFX 소개 링크
Entropy
코같투님이 피리를 불었습니다.
저도 최대 혜택 코드를 가져오긴 했습니다
https://entropy.io/?r=pagu
현재 마켓이 Sandisk / Anthropic 두개만 열려 있고, IO 표기가 되어있는 것이 Entropy 마켓 입니다.
Hyperliquid 홈페이지에서도 거래 가능하고,
반대로 Entropy 홈페이지에서 다른 페어들도 거래 가능하나, 당연하게도 다른 페어 거래시 적합한 거래량으로 집계되지 않습니다.
더 많은 정보 가져오도록 하겠습니다.
✨내일 밤 10시 라이브!
Auto 트레이딩 시스템을 구축하는 방법을 라이브로 시연할 예정입니다!
오덜리에서 Starchild 모듈을 활용하여 나를 대신해 실시간으로 거래를 실행하는 과정까지 함께 살펴볼 예정입니다.
현재 무언가를 빌딩하고 계시거나, 빌딩을 고민하고 계시다면 이번 라이브가 도움이 되었으면 좋겠습니다.
⏰ 8월 27일 목요일 밤 10시 (KST)
📍 Orderly X 라이브 스페이스
트레이딩 에이전트에 대해 궁금한 점이나, 다루고 싶은 주제가 있다면 댓글로 남겨주세요! 알찬 내용들로 열심히 준비해 오겠습니다!
내일 만나요💜
Pendle Boros x GATE CrossEx 를 이용한 펀딩비 파밍
지난번에도 올렸었는데,
Pendle 에서 GATE CrossEx 를 이용하여 Funding Rate Farming 을 할 수 있는 터미널을 오픈소스화 함
https://boros.pendle.finance/arbitrage-crossex/
여기 가면 있는데,
깃헙 링크는
https://github.com/pendle-finance/arbitrage-with-crossex
이걸로 보로스까지 이용할 수 있는 건지는 확인이 필요한데,
설명하는 거로는 그냥 CrossEx 만 이용해서 다 되는것처럼 되어 있음
파구도 계속 해봐야지 하다가 아직 못하고는 있는데,
나중에 해보고 결과 올려볼 예정
사실 문제는 GATE 라는 것이긴 해서, 큰돈 넣기는 어려울것 같긴 함
참고…
🇪🇭 City Protocol 1,100만 달러 규모 프리 A라운드 유치
✅ City Protocold이 총 1100만 달러 규모의 시드·프리 A 라운드 투자를 유치했다고 밝혔습니다.
📂 주요 내용
🟢드래곤플라이 캐피털, 점프 크립토, CMT 디지털, 스트래티파이드 캐피털, 아다버스, 미라나 등이 참여
✍ City Protocol이 투자유치 소식을 밝혔습니다. 쟁쟁한 곳들에서 투자를 유치했네요. 현재 운영중인 플랫폼인 벤조를 통해 월렛 내에서 포트폴리오를 직접 운용할 수 있는 테마형 볼트도 출시할 예정이라고 합니다.
트위터
#CityProtocol
Signed Pagu Info
Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @pgyinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@pgyinfo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mrminersolana named in 1 post, 21 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방 @tlsrltnf · 22,385 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
🔥요블이 세상살이🔥 @yobeullyANN · 22,081 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
잼민123🦅 @mujammin123 · 25,998 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
취미생활방📮 @enjoymyhobby · 49,893 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
New Listings Feed @NewListingsFeed · 59,123 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH @BChoSN · 24,973 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN @emperorcoin · 37,467 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
COINNESS News Feed (코인니스) @coinnesskr · 30,958 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
ZAP Tech News @zaponblast · 65,237 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방 @shrimp_notice · 28,814 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
졸업준비위원회🎓 @officialunivercityofcrypto · 23,023 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
불개미 CRYPTO @fireant_crypto · 32,960 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
우리는 트윗충 @twitchoong · 74,250 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
에어드랍ATM @Bounty_ATM · 25,514 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
기분좋은 마곤 @magonia_b · 26,934 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅 @WeCryptoTogether · 49,139 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
해달의 투자 정보 공유 @seaotterbtc · 30,155 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PaguInfo 파구정보 (DeFi Info)” (@pgyinfo), 8,458 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pgyinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.