Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PaguInfo 파구정보 (DeFi Info)

Channel

PaguInfo 파구정보 (DeFi Info)

@pgyinfo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,355subscribers

-270 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001301520513
TypeChannel
Username@pgyinfo
DescriptionDeFi, NFT and Crypto Info Channel #AD = paid AD / #KOL = requested post TeleChat: t.me/PaguInfo_Chat Blog: pgyinfo.tistory.com Twitter: twitter.com/NewPaguInfo DM: t.me/PaguInfo
Created31 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pgyinfo

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,3558,6258,4906 August 2026 — 8,625 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,625 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,620 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,610 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,591 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,584 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,579 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,569 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,551 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,543 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,535 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,525 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,503 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,483 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,458 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,435 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,404 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,402 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,394 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,389 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,386 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,385 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,387 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,371 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,362 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,355 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -270. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,315–8,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 11:088,355-7
2 Nov 2026, 09:598,362-9
30 Oct 2026, 10:388,371-16
27 Oct 2026, 05:278,387+2
24 Oct 2026, 02:408,385-1
20 Oct 2026, 17:208,386-3
17 Oct 2026, 13:388,389-5
14 Oct 2026, 14:378,394-8
11 Oct 2026, 12:578,402-2
4 Oct 2026, 19:598,404-31
25 Sept 2026, 12:228,435-23
16 Sept 2026, 14:378,458-25
12 Sept 2026, 12:178,483-20
8 Sept 2026, 13:198,503-22
3 Sept 2026, 09:158,525-10
31 Aug 2026, 06:448,535-8
28 Aug 2026, 00:168,543-8
24 Aug 2026, 15:398,551-18
20 Aug 2026, 16:218,569-10
18 Aug 2026, 02:228,579first reading

Engagement

174 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.06%
avg views ÷ 8,355 subscribers
Avg views / post
423
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.116%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 174 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held174 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total17,750
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,400
Videos
≈125
Links
≈5,580

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 33 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4271.2%
👍1016.9%
😁35.08%
🔥23.39%
😍11.69%
🤯11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC90 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

📈RISEx 독도대회는 마감 상금 66,000불에 포인트 8400점이나 상위 70명한테 주겟네요. 커트라인 볼륨은 8m 정도인듯 최종순위 확인하기 https://www.dokdodao.io/campaigns/103328384272093184?page=5

Signed Pagu Info

5 Nov 2026, 01:30 UTC270 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @definewssumPhoto

📊 11월 5일 Perp DEX 데이터 Vol Hyperliquid가 24시간 거래량 $17.19B로 1위이며, 2위 Variational($3.20B)의 약 5.37배 Hyperliquid의 OI는 $7.65B(+3.75%), Vol/OI는 2.25, TVL은 $6.44B 거래량은 Lighter($3.03B)와 Aster($2.64B)가 Variational 뒤를 이음 OI 14곳 중 9곳은 OI가 늘었고, 줄어든 곳 중에서는 Backpack이 -3.79%로 낙폭 가장 큼 Extended(-1.52%), Variational(-1.00%), RiseX(-0.92%)도 OI가 줄어듦 EVEDEX(-0.20%)는 OI 변동이 작음 Vol/OI Vol/OI는 Pacifica 16.46, Nado 11.44로 OI 대비 거래 회전이 가장 높음…

Signed Pagu Info

5 Nov 2026, 01:29 UTC228 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @definewssum

DeFi News Summary 2026-11-05 09:00 KST [DeFi] - Pendle: Pendle RWA 인터페이스 공개 링크 - Tria: Tria Gacha 전체 사용자 대상 출시 링크 - Ondo: Ondo, SEC에 명의개서대리인 규정 의견서 제출 링크 - Base: $SPCXc, Aave V4에 상장 링크 - Ondo: Ondo Stocks 선거일 밤 거래량 증가 링크 [Chain] - GIWA: GIWA 테스트넷 Karst 하드포크(Upgrade 19) 링크 - Arc: Arc, 온체인 트레이딩 이미 가동 중 링크 [PerpDEX] - Ondo Perps: Ondo Private Markets 출시, 첫 자산 OPAIPon 라이브 링크 - RiseX: RISEx, $ARM 10배 레버리지 상장 링크 - RiseX…

Signed Pagu Info

4 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC369 viewsread 6 November 2026

포인트 예상 가치는 아래와 같음 FDV 3.5% 10% $50M $0.0217 $0.0621 $75M $0.0326 $0.0932 $100M $0.0435 $0.1242 $150M $0.0652 $0.1863 설마 3.5% 만 이번에 주고, 다른 포인트 프로그램으로 10% 를 주진 않겠지...

Signed Pagu Info

4 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC388 viewsread 6 November 2026

X에서 돌고 있는 얘기는 사실이에요. 다만 Hibachi 팀이 공식으로 확인한 건 아니에요. 출처는 EU 가상자산 규제(MiCA)에 따라 낸 백서인데, 공식 MiCA 등록 사이트에 실제로 올라가 있었다고 해요. 총공급은 2.5B $HEAT이고, 투자자 25%, 팀 20%, 에어드랍 10%로 나와 있어요. 3.5%는 에어드랍 전체가 아니라 상장일(TGE)에 바로 풀리는 몫이고, 나머지 6.5%는 약 90일 뒤부터 나눠서 풀린다고 해요. 반응은 대체로 실망이에요. 포인트를 모은 사람들한테 조금씩만 푼다는 불만이 많아요. 공식 계정 @hibachi_xyz는 10월 28일 이후에 주간 포인트 공지 하나만 올렸고, 토크노믹스는 언급하지 않았어요. 포인트 프로그램은 11월 8일에 끝나요. 참고할 만한 글은 Haskell_Gz 글(MiCA 문서 설…

Signed Pagu Info

4 Nov 2026, 14:32 UTC367 views0 reactionsread 6 November 2026

이때 업데이트 유출 되었던가?! 에드 3.5% 라고?! 벌시 진짜 하...

Signed Pagu Info

4 Nov 2026, 14:32 UTC302 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @definewsraw

[PerpDEX] Hibachi Hibachi 공식 문서(docs.hibachi.xyz) 메인 페이지 변경이 감지되었습니다. 목차는 소개, 시작하기, 트레이딩, 볼트, 키 관리, 검증, FAQ 항목으로 구성되어 있습니다. 구체적인 변경 내용은 공개된 정보에 명시되어 있지 않습니다. 출처 · ☆ 2/10

Signed Pagu Info

4 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC332 viewsread 6 November 2026

시바치, 아니 히바치도 냄새가 슬슬 풍기기 시작한다 벌시... 아니 뭐만 하면 진자 마가 꼈나 왜이래 진짜

Signed Pagu Info

4 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC228 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @havelawPhoto

Hibachi는 없는거니...

Signed Pagu Info

4 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC205 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @havelawPhoto

Circle, 3분기 실적발표에서 확인된 $ARC 1. $ARC 토큰 발행 완료 - 초기 총공급량 10B 제네시스 민팅 완료 - 네트워크 보안, 유틸리티, 거버넌스 용도로 설계 - 2027년 PoS 전환 추진 2. ARC 토큰 프리세일 매출 $182M - 3분기 기타 매출 $207M 중 $182M이 ARC 토큰 프리세일에서 발생 - 기타 매출의 약 88%가 ARC 프리세일에서 발생한 셈 - 서클의 3분기 실적 개선에도 기여 3. Arc 메인넷 및 생태계 - 9월 16일 퍼블릭 메인넷 출시 - 출시 첫날 100개 이상의 기관 및 생태계 빌더 참여 - Arc House 회원 75,000명 이상, Architect 앰버서더 10,000명 - 프라이빗 메인넷 기간 1,200개 이상의 프로젝트 구축 👉 눈에 띄는 건 ARC 토큰 프리세일로 이미…

Signed Pagu Info

4 Nov 2026, 14:24 UTC226 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @basketballcrypto

그니까 토큰 발행할거처럼 광고해서 1만불, 1천불 연회비로 카드팔고 포인트주면서 장사하다가 포인트를 지분도아니고 지분을 받을 수 있는 프로그램의 증표로 바꿔주는데 그 비율도 지맘대로고 디테일은 아직도 안나왔다는거죠? 12월 안내할때 안하면 그마저도 못받는다는거네요? 최근들어 사업접은 (앱스트랙이라던지 앱스트랙이라던지 ㅅㅂ) 개자식들부터 도게자 박아야함. 철판깔고 개나소나 사업접는걸 장황하게 포장하는데 다들 도가 튼듯;; 제일 빡치는건 다들 하나도 안미안해 보인다는거임

Signed Pagu Info

4 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC203 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @minchoisfuture

ㄴ 코멘트를 해보자면... 정작 그 스톡옵션 12만개가 어떤 내용인지 등의 내용이 다 누락되어 있네요. CEO가 너무 당당하게 글을 써서 뭔가 했는데 읽어보면 사실상 큰 알맹이가 없음.. 대충 역산해서 계산해보면 수치가 딱딱 떨어져서 의도한 수치같긴 한데, 결국은 어떻게 현금화를 해줄 것인지, 스탁옵션은 뭔 내용인지등이 없어서 쩝.. 써둔 글 내용을 보면 백팩때랑 정말 비슷한데... 백팩도 사실상 에어드랍작 하던 입장에서는 뒷통수라 표현해도 되는 내용이었지만 그래도 백팩측은 팀이나 투자자 측도 배수진으로 함께하는 구조로 짰던 토크노믹스로 토큰이라도 찍긴 했다면, 얘들은 초반부터 공수표는 더 많이 발행해놓고, 결과적으로는 자기들은 전혀 잃을거 없이 짜두고 일방통보한게 더 가관이네..

Signed Pagu Info

Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @pgyinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,427
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
30대에 은퇴번복한 머피
@murphybus · 19,930
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
DeFi 농부 👨🏻‍🌾 조선생
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,308
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,500
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
🔥요블이 세상살이🔥
@yobeullyANN · 22,294
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,827
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Gram 🇰🇷
@toncoin_kr · 23,023
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 48,959
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
New Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,228
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea)
@airdrop_kor · 21,335
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,372
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,620
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
COINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 30,459
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
ZAP Tech News
@zaponblast · 63,118
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,359
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
졸업준비위원회🎓
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,709
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,734
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
디지털자산/AI/경제(케이씨지)
@coinkcgchannel · 15,459
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
Layergg exchange & project alert
@layergg · 19,333
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
우리는 트윗충
@twitchoong · 78,515
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,845
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,419
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,246
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,273
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PaguInfo 파구정보 (DeFi Info)” (@pgyinfo), 8,355 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pgyinfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.