Channel
@justdegenguy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,597subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002373735487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @justdegenguy |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/justdegenguy |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 8,597 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 8,603 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 8,611 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 8,608 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 8,602 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 8,595 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 8,587 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 8,589 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 8,584 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 8,588 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 8,585 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 8,574 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 8,572 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 8,578 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 8,578 | first reading |
180 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 180 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,528 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
105 reactions across 32 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5357579953497983889 | 105 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 180 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 180 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/justdegenguy/4426 리필해쏘요 제가 뿌리는건 제 볼륨 더 나오기 전까지는 한동안 안나올듯 https://www.qfex.com/ 4ZB05SHA T25BHF8V WDGQ52NV T1JRWKNH PFEX4002 XAJXJRYX 1H565BAX 544YZ9J4 JD4QGYBJ 08QW1H05 161JT95X 6VSFHANV AFSEYA78 KTXDXC98 0ERVXRJK EWX9SQGJ 8QZT28ET NMCC5RYV CT0BD0RE 7FJHANHF FT49KXB9 YCTAQ2F3 75YG0QX5 Z2B1XQRZ P722T48A YBPZMYKY RQK6QBY0 S57Q6JSF 2XGJM4QG Q27T06J5
custom 53575799534979838893
반가워요 김프님 오랜만이에요 ~
https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42634 대한민국은 열거주의라 "가상자산 무기한 선물 상품"에 대한 법적 정의가 없으므로 세금 안내도 된다는데 그럼 하리나 바낸 선물 수익은 앞으로도 세금 0라는건가요?
칩 이녀석 ... 기억을 되찾은거야?
바이낸스 RLUSD 이율도 메마 어카운트 이율에 따잇... 최근에 좀 비좁아져서 APR이 이전보다 많이 구려졌음... 방 좀 빼주세요 물론 월렛 보관이랑 거래소 보관은 보안 / 심리적으로 차이가 존재, 근데 본인 관리 방식에 따라 천지차이인게 월렛 보관이라 보안만 잘 한다면 고려할만 한듯
안쫄고 쓰는 이유 -> 단건 거래 2.4M 수익 (리더보드 1등) 출금 잘해준듯. 이정도 규모에 저정도 포지션 받아준 것도 신기하네 근데 너무 부럽다 IOVA가 뭐에요?
초대 코드 있어야 가입 가능한 상황인듯? 거래량 5M당 초대 코드가 5개 나온다는데, QFEX 써보실 분들은 아래 코드 ㄱㄱ 아마 이게 지금 전부일듯 저한테는 포인트 프로그램은 없고, 활동은 기록중이라고 하는데 파밍은 포인트 프로그램 오픈하고 고려해도 안늦음 그냥 써보고싶은 사람만 ㄱㄱ 추가 코드는 볼륨 더 찍게되면 가져와봄 https://www.qfex.com/ 다 나갓오요
QFEX 초대코드 2개 0HDQM7JC NFJ66X0V 퍼블릭이라는데 아직도 필요한지는 몰루
custom 53575799534979838894
진짜 골때리는 새기 ... 브라이언 존슨의 속보 • Braintree·Venmo를 $800M에 매각한 뒤, 자기 몸으로 역노화를 실험하는 ‘Blueprint’를 시작한 테크 사업가. • 발기 지속시간·성관계 횟수는 물론 파트너의 질 건강 점수 같은 극도로 사적인 생체정보까지 SNS에 공개해 자주 어그로를 끈다. • 이런 충격적인 데이터 공개로 관심을 모아 ‘Don’t Die’ 장수운동과 Blueprint 사업을 홍보하는 인물이다.
대충 저스틴썬 문학 PNL 정리
custom 53575799534979838891
저스틴썬 포티문학 요약 : 대리모만 흥따리 대리모 기관 계약금 약 2억 7,620만 원(20만 달러)도 있었다. 환불 불가. 대리모는 1월에 이미 정해져 있었다. 캘리포니아 사람, 34세, 아이 둘을 낳은 적 있음. 서류에 사진이 있었지만 나는 보지 않았다. 그녀는 1월부터 준비돼 있었다.
ai 발전과 규모의 경제를 매일 체감하며 본인이 타인보다 잘한다고 생각하는 영역의 아비트라지는 보이는 순간 바로 행해야 한다. 그 아비트라지는 길지 않다. 당장의 아비트라지가 크지 않더라도 짧은 아비트라지를 계속 찾아나가야 한다. 정말 하고 싶은 / 좋아 하는 것을 계속 가져가야 한다. 모든 것을 베팅하는 것은 도박이지만, 본인만의 씨앗은 언제 어떻게 꽃을 피울 수 있음을 감안해야 한다. 그리고 항상 기록할 것. 방향성이 확실하지 않다면 해야 하는 것은 (1) 체력 (2) 모국어 포함 언어 (3) 사고력을 늘려야 한다. 빠른 세상에는 다양한 부채가 쌓이고, 언어와 인지 역량은 공통적 부채이다. taste는 단순한 취향이 아닌 생각 자체의 미감이다.
Showing the 12 most recent of 180 posts we hold for @justdegenguy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 62 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Degen Guy” (@justdegenguy), 8,597 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justdegenguy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.