Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Degen Guy

Channel

Degen Guy

@justdegenguy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,398subscribers

+1,820 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002373735487
TypeChannel
Username@justdegenguy
DescriptionChat - t.me/justadegenchat Contact - @dokudoku1219 투자 권유 채널이 아닙니다.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/justdegenguy

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,57210,7819,676.56 August 2026 — 8,578 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,578 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,572 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,574 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,585 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,588 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,584 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,589 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,587 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,595 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,602 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,608 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,611 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,603 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,597 subscribers27 September 2026 — 10,415 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,781 subscribers9 October 2026 — 10,692 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,632 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,615 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,617 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,620 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,611 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,606 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,583 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,526 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,404 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,482 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,447 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,402 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,481 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,472 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,467 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,466 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,430 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,438 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,436 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,440 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,434 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,397 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,396 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,398 subscribers10,3986 August 20266 November 2026
42 measurements spanning 93 days, net +1,820. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,241–11,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 14:1610,398+2
5 Nov 2026, 11:1910,396-1
4 Nov 2026, 12:1610,397-37
3 Nov 2026, 08:4910,434-6
2 Nov 2026, 11:3710,440+4
1 Nov 2026, 14:3810,436-2
31 Oct 2026, 15:3610,438+8
30 Oct 2026, 12:4010,430-36
29 Oct 2026, 14:0810,466-1
28 Oct 2026, 13:5710,467-5
27 Oct 2026, 10:5610,472-9
26 Oct 2026, 12:0510,481+79
25 Oct 2026, 11:1510,402-45
24 Oct 2026, 13:3610,447-35
23 Oct 2026, 15:0010,482+78
22 Oct 2026, 14:4710,404-122
21 Oct 2026, 06:4710,526-57
20 Oct 2026, 02:2710,583-23
18 Oct 2026, 23:5710,606-5
17 Oct 2026, 22:0510,611first reading

Engagement

266 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 10,398 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.166%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 266 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 69 of 86 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held266 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total120,423
Reactions total165
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 09:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,970
Videos
≈25
Links
≈1,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

270 reactions across 101 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5357579953497983889270100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 266 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 266 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 266 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @justdegenguy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 266 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.376%
1 of 266 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
893
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
978
over 265 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 266 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 86 posts held from the last 30 days (11.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 08:42 UTC439 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

밈 시장은 진짜 안좋은게 일론 트윗 재료도 이제 3-8M 정도인듯

custom 53575799534979838892

7 Nov 2026, 14:27 UTC941 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

전직 FBI 요원 야로치님이 미확인 적국 지갑에서 암호화폐 훔쳐서 포트투갈 포도농장 구입하려다가 들킴

7 Nov 2026, 04:42 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

토큰 FDV는 215M인데 유동성은 59K임 ㅋㅋㅋ 예측시장때문에 장난치는 느낌

7 Nov 2026, 04:40 UTC≈1,080 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

퍼프퍼 클레임 된다고하는데 156주 베스팅이라고 함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 전 그냥 확인 안할래요 ....

custom 53575799534979838891

6 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,150 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

일본애들은 레퍼럴 팔 때도 멘트가 좀 귀여운 것 같은데 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이거 그냥 평범하게 이득이라고 생각하고 가져왔는데, 한 명도 리퍼럴 밟은 사람 없다는 게 진짜야…? 수수료 무료가 되는 게 꽤 크다고 생각하는데, 다들 영혼의 절약파라서 별로 상관없는 느낌인가…? TxFlow면 수수료랑 플러스 마이너스 제로 정도의 이익은 낼 수 있는 건데… 10% 정도면 사소한 이익이라 썩 내키지 않는 느낌인가…

custom 53575799534979838893

6 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC≈2,010 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

크립토든 주식이든 열심히 팔로업하다보면 남의 수익 카드를 항상 마주치게 되는데, 그러다 보면 본인이 잘하고있음에도 불구하고 만족하던 숫자에 만족하지 못하게 되는 문제가 생길 수 있는듯. 열심히 팔로업을 하더라도 내 기준 잘 세우고 너무 조급해하지 않기 근데 숫자 오픈 안하고 퍼센트만 있는 PNL 카드나 대충 번 척 하는 글 보고 조급해지면 진짜 바보임 그것만은 피하셈

custom 53575799534979838894

6 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,020 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026

이제 그냥 번들링, 뒷지갑은 당연한 것처럼 인식되는데 이렇게 주기적으로 까발려주는 주체가 있다는 것 자체가 이 시장에 매우 긍정적인듯. 모든 시장이 트레이더를 우상화하는 경향이 있다보니까 Fomo는 리더보드에 나중에 다 녹아있을 미실현손익 달아놓고 트레이딩 포르노 팔고, CT들은 번들로 상위 홀더에 본지갑 박아놓고 안파는척 하면서 뒷지갑으로 팔면 로빈후드 슈퍼사이클인줄 알고 뒤쫓아온 사람들은 영문도 모르고 돈 녹고 이게 반복되면 시장도 침체되는데, 왜 시장이 점점 보여줘야 하는 정보를 숨기는 쪽으로 가는지 모르겠음. 하소연은 그만하고 버블맵 본문 • 카피 트레이더를 끌어들이기 위한 공개 지갑 • 덤핑을 위한 사이드 지갑 • 리워드를 농사짓기 위한 콜아웃 • 공급량을 숨기기 위한 번들 토큰 그리고 똑같은 짓을 하는 이들이 더 많다 왜 …

custom 53575799534979838893

6 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈2,110 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

트위터에 일본인들의 키옥시아 퇴학선언만 보여서 알아봤더니 저점 대비 73배 올랐다가 거기서 -78퍼 맞았구나... 심지어 일본은 100주씩 사야했는데 지금은 3:1 액분 가격이라 고점에서는 한 묶음에 9천만원씩 사야했음 (1주씩 거래 되는 증권사도 있긴했음)

6 Nov 2026, 13:55 UTC946 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

오 인직튜브 이걸로 나스닥 개장 벨울리네 오늘 11시 반

6 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,380 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

귀여운 일본 친구들도 같은 고통을 공유하는중

custom 53575799534979838892

6 Nov 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,010 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

인텔 3M 봉 마이그레이션 전 펌프펀 차트같은데?

custom 53575799534979838891

Showing the 12 most recent of 266 posts we hold for @justdegenguy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 67 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

종명이의 딸깍
@jh_6598 · 10,316
10 posts
크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,118
7 posts
에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,822
6 posts
꿀찾는 양말이 Super N 크립토 일기장 ⚡️
@Honeyofwhitesocks_2 · 11,083
6 posts
㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,404
5 posts
잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,790
5 posts
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,243
4 posts
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,345
3 posts
아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 11,823
3 posts
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,223
3 posts
크립토파즈(Cryptopaz)
@cryptopaz0 · 10,494
3 posts
싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 11,026
3 posts
이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,385
3 posts
쉬러감청소년
@Iwanttogohome09 · 6,110
2 posts
세나 리서치
@ResearchSena · 11,437
2 posts
바나의 꺾여도 그냥 하는 방
@bana_list · 338
2 posts
코인맵핵 🎈
@centurywhale · 16,395
2 posts
냥집사 쿠모의 츄르값 벌기
@cumo_announcement3 · 335
2 posts
취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 48,909
2 posts
GDR Capital (꺼드럭 캐피털)
@gdrcapital · 2,142
2 posts
희단이의 Web3 꿀정보 공지방
@heedan22 · 8,047
2 posts
Manbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 16,395
2 posts
언제 일일이 손으로 다하냐
@keepgoingzaemi · 375
2 posts
MYU's Research (AI & WEB3)
@myu_moonyu · 7,186
2 posts
재간둥이 송선생
@songjongsik · 18,525
2 posts
T.A Crypto
@yul_papa · 7,517
2 posts
크립토 부엉이🦉
@CryptoOwlNotice · 7,725
1 post
크립토 스패니얼
@CryptoSpaniel · 11,215
1 post
돈독이 바짝 오른 돈독킹
@Dondoking · 215
1 post
Eden 항해일지
@Edenmadoros · 238
1 post
GMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,169
1 post
AI MASTERS
@ai_masters_community · 14,398
1 post
에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea)
@airdrop_kor · 21,299
1 post
한몸이된다
@bconebody · 98
1 post
Buy High Sell Low
@billair1 · 6,313
1 post
🤏🏾🫃🏻🌈
@btc_sibal · 6,076
1 post
글 쓰는거 좋아하는 아르르
@c_laundry · 131
1 post
안성국밥 크립토 맛집 🍲
@coinkookbob · 4,242
1 post
보노의 야수매매
@cryptobonobobo · 736
1 post
코인그리더 - 쉽고 빠른 코인 정보
@cryptogustavo · 2
1 post
돈버는 작당모의
@cryptopangpang · 11,425
1 post
돌곰배와 매직 코인일기
@dolgommagic · 12,127
1 post
EWL's doomscroll
@ewlreads · 7,316
1 post
느낌좋은금융마스터포럼
@feelgoodforum · 31
1 post
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,729
1 post
구랑이
@gurangcoin · 577
1 post
꿀통(HONEYBOTTLE)
@honeybottlenft · 2,341
1 post
꿀통연구소 Honeylab Airdrop · Perps · AI
@honeylab1 · 3,216
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

종명이의 딸깍
@jh_6598 · 10,316
9 posts
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,223
7 posts
㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,404
6 posts
돈포하 I Dont focus on hype
@Web3LearningWithInger · 6,214
4 posts
캘빈의 감금원
@c4lvinlocked · 2,808
4 posts
Manbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 16,395
4 posts
EWL's doomscroll
@ewlreads · 7,316
3 posts
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,393
2 posts
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,345
1 post
Four Pillars Research (KR)
@FourPillarsFP · 3,108
1 post
라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,898
1 post
AI MASTERS
@ai_masters_community · 14,398
1 post
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,483
1 post
가봉의 일드파밍과 배당청년단
@cctgavong · 3,601
1 post
폐지줍는 츄카피
@chukapikachu · 10,815
1 post
COINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 30,419
1 post
조선미래연구소
@cryptobyrdemarty · 452
1 post
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,729
1 post
GDR Capital (꺼드럭 캐피털)
@gdrcapital · 2,142
1 post
Zi존파워잼민
@jammin0720 · 5,729
1 post
KDP
@kdp_dao · 5,373
1 post
킬베로스 ( Killberos ) 🐾
@killberosDAO · 14,913
1 post
AI 구독료 벌어야하는 레오
@leo_autotrading · 1,239
1 post
인생코인
@lnsanecoin · 7,940
1 post
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,243
1 post
마인부우의 크립토볼
@minebuu_cryptoball · 10,725
1 post
Pache Punch
@pachepunch · 3,724
1 post
힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,151
1 post
어이 청진기
@rising_090 · 3,271
1 post
누군가의 쉐도우일상 일지
@shadow_investor_ann · 2,160
1 post
추잡한 Manbull의 코인정치갤러리
@truthofmanbull · 1,193
1 post
ordinary subinium
@web3subin · 9,738
1 post
🔥요블이 세상살이🔥
@yobeullyANN · 22,253
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Degen Guy” (@justdegenguy), 10,398 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justdegenguy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.