✅고팍스 아직도 재개안되는중 이더계열은 콜드로 다빼놓은걸로 확인되는데 얼마나 구체적인 협박메일이길래 이렇게까지 하는건지..
Signed McCoy | GMB LABS

Channel
@GMBLABS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,169subscribers
-312 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001566624832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GMBLABS |
| Created | 28 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GMBLABS |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:18 | 11,169 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:07 | 11,172 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:59 | 11,175 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:49 | 11,179 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:09 | 11,180 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:35 | 11,183 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 11,187 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 11,191 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 11,194 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 11,199 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 11,207 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:55 | 11,211 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 11,215 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:26 | 11,218 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:39 | 11,224 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 11,229 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 11,234 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:31 | 11,235 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:54 | 11,236 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 11,237 | first reading |
141 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 141 (29 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 68,457 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 08:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
234 reactions across 61 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 182 | 77.8% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 10.3% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 8.97% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.71% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.427% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.427% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.427% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✅고팍스 아직도 재개안되는중 이더계열은 콜드로 다빼놓은걸로 확인되는데 얼마나 구체적인 협박메일이길래 이렇게까지 하는건지..
Signed McCoy | GMB LABS
https://x.com/USTreasury/status/2118830891522830391 MEXC가 이란 관련된 돈세탁 거래소로 지목돼 미국 제재를 받게 됐으니, 절대 사용하시지 마시길 바랍니다.
👍6
Signed Chuchu | GMB LABS
고팍스 상태가 이상하네요 보안 강화를 위한 선제적인 조치로 가상자산 전량을 콜드 월렛에 이전하고 모든 매매 서비스를 일시 중단했다고 하는데 실제로 거래소에 들어가 보면 아무것도 안 뜨기까지 하는 상황입니다.
Signed Index l GMB LABS
✅$CARDS에서 뚱뚱한 손가락 일어난듯
Signed McCoy | GMB LABS
✅ 장투 전도사 존리 "1~2년 치 변동에 일희일비하는 건 도박" 존리 대표는 "주식 투자의 본질은 10~20년 뒤 은퇴를 대비한 노후 자금 마련"이라며 "고작 6개월, 1년 남짓 투자해 놓고 돈이 녹아내린다며 불안해하는 것은 시간 개념 자체가 왜곡된 것"이라고 지적했다. 일각에서 권하는 '마켓 타이밍(매매 시점 포착)'과 외국인 수급에 따른 추종 매매에 대해서도 날을 세웠다. 존리 대표는 "더 떨어질 것 같으니 현금 비중을 늘렸다가 바닥에서 다시 사라는 조언은 인간이 할 수 없는 영역을 하라는 소리이자 개인을 망치는 최악의 조언"이라며 "금리나 환율 등 언론에 도배되는 뉴스의 95%는 이미 주가에 반영된 소음에 불과하다"고 꼬집었다. 잦은 매매로 확실하게 불어나는 것은 오직 증권사 거래 수수료뿐이라는 설명이다. https://n.n…
Signed McCoy | GMB LABS
선거 결과로 인해 주식시장이 역사상 최악의 날 중 하나를 겪었다. 정말 지켜보기 안타까운 일이다! 우리는 그 누구도 이전에 본 적 없는 수준까지 주식시장을 끌어올리기 위해 엄청난 노력을 기울였다. 그런데 이런 일이 벌어졌다. 그 결과 여러분의 401(k) 퇴직연금 계좌도 하락했다. 기억하라. 이건 공화당 때문이 아니라 멍청한 민주당 때문이었다. 하지만 두려워하지 마라! 우리는 곧 어떤 방식으로든 이전보다 훨씬 더 위대하고 강력해질 것이다. 미국을 다시 위대하게!
👍5
Signed Chuchu | GMB LABS
[속보] 법원, '개인정보 유출' 쿠팡 과징금 4천억 부과효력 유지
Signed McCoy | GMB LABS
🤗 앤트로픽 리서치에 언급된 Mantle 앤트로픽에서 최근 AI 응답이 어느 모델에서 나왔는지 영지식 증명으로 검증하는 FlashProve에 대한 공개했는데 리서치에서 이 기술이 이미 L2에서 쓰이는 zkSNARK와 같은 종류라고 설명하며, 실전 사례로 맨틀을 언급했네요. 블록체인 검증을 위해 다듬어진 ZK 기술이 맨틀과 Succinct에서 활용된 것 AI 신뢰성을 확인하기 위해 사용되는 모습입니다 리서치 #MANTLE #KOL
Signed Index l GMB LABS
✅유예도 유예인데, 손실 이월공제 3년 허용도 되게 좋네요 정부는 추가 유예기간 동안 가상자산 투자 손실을 이후 3년간 발생한 이익에서 공제하는 손실 이월공제 도입도 추진할 방침이다. 그간 가상자산 과세제도에서 손실 이월 공제제도는 담겨 있지 않았다. https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/032/0003480888?sid=101
👍2
Signed McCoy | GMB LABS
✅그의 메가프로젝트 일단 충청도부터 하나봅니다 특히 이번 증설은 정부의 '대한민국 대도약 3대 메가프로젝트' 중 전국 최초로 착공하는 사업이다. 충청권을 HBM 첨단 패키징 거점으로 재편하는 투자 계획이 본격적인 실행 단계에 접어든 셈이다. 이 회장은 지난 6월 국민보고회에서 "HBM 팹은 기존 반도체 후공정 팹과 함께 천안·온양 등 충청권에 집중 투자하겠다"고 밝힌 바 있다. https://n.news.naver.com/article/008/0005437117
Signed McCoy | GMB LABS
바낸 이더는 누가 잠깐 세일했네요
Signed Chuchu | GMB LABS
중간선거 이후 곤란해진 머스크? 머스크는 이번 선거에서 공화당을 지원하기 위해 한화로 약 6천억 원 이상을 기부했지만, 결과는… 민주당의 승리. 게다가 민주당 측은 선거 전부터 DOGE 수장 시절의 행적, 스페이스X와 NASA 간의 계약 등을 문제 삼으며 머스크를 조사하겠다고 벼르고 있었던 터라, 머스크도 이번엔 좀 곤란해질 수도 있겠네요.
Signed Index l GMB LABS
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @GMBLABS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 56 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GMB LABS” (@GMBLABS), 11,169 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GMBLABS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.