비트코인의 운명
- 75K를 깨고 오른다27%
- 75K를 안깨고 오른다30%
- 70K 까지 깬다16%
- 이번 하락으로 60K 간다26%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1

Channel
@Goraetracker
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
9,658subscribers
-437 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002535423119 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Goraetracker |
| Description | Track the apex predators of crypto. DM : @Goatdda |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 40 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Goraetracker |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:26 | 9,658 | -25 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:21 | 9,683 | -25 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 9,708 | -21 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 9,729 | -16 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 9,745 | -17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 9,762 | -18 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 9,780 | -21 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:39 | 9,801 | -8 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 17:56 | 9,809 | -45 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 09:22 | 9,854 | -31 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 9,885 | -27 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 9,912 | -26 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 9,938 | -17 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 9,955 | -22 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 9,977 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:06 | 9,996 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 10,004 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 10,007 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 10,013 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 10,021 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (22 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,940 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 21:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
915 reactions across 42 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 509 | 55.6% | |
| 🐳 | 320 | 35.0% | |
| 👍 | 86 | 9.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 915 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Goraetracker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
비트코인의 운명
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
요새 AI로 각자 하리 고래들 추적하는거같아서 채널에 굳이 안올렸는데 다시 그래도 업로드해볼까요.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🐳36❤7
[하이퍼리퀴드 고래, $3.2억 BTC·ETH 롱 포지션 보유...올해 수익 $1.16억] 온체인 분석가 엠버CN에 따르면 하이퍼리퀴드의 한 고래가 10개 주소를 통해 약 3억2000만 달러 규모의 BTC·ETH 롱 포지션을 보유 중이다. 포지션 규모는 1400 BTC와 8만2000 ETH이며, 평균 진입가는 각각 7만5967 달러, 2493 달러다. 현재 미실현 수익은 약 877만 달러로 집계됐다. 해당 고래는 올해 여러 차례 BTC·ETH 롱 포지션 거래를 통해 총 1억1670만 달러의 수익을 거둔 것으로 알려졌다. https://coinness.com/news/1171300
안녕하세요 그 누구보다 코인 트레이딩에 진심임 남자, 고따입니다. 불개미님께서 24년도에 이어 올해도 저희 코인충들을 위해 발벗고 나서주셨어요. 저는 전업으로 트레이딩만 하는 개백수 코인충이라 당연히 코인 과세 유예가 되었으면 좋겠습니다! 그래서 개인적으로 후원을 할까 하다가.. 어제 금액도 금액이지만 최대한 많은 사람들이 참여해주는게 더 중요하다는걸 보고 좋은 아이디어가 생각나서 바~로 낋여왔습니다. 참여 방법 1. 불개미님 후원 주소로 $1 이상 송금하기 솔라나 : FQASshV6GR8ZGD7XTwsW7TQuz8Jou3GQcZ2HHwC5a8DW EVM (BNB, 이더리움 등 이더리움계열 체인) : 0x403b5240c372ba850233911854ccc5f6f250e2a1 2. 구글폼에 텔레그램 핸들과 송금 TXID를 제출하기 …
👍28🐳15❤1
😆PERP DEX DAY Trader분들이 도착했습니다! 작년부터 이어진 2회차 대회를 준비했습니다! 이번에도 많은 분들의 요청대로 진짜 트레이딩을 하시고, 행사를 즐길 줄 아시는 분들을 기준으로 섭외요청 드렸고, 더욱 재미있게 기획했습니다. 이번 PERPDEXDAY에서 1등을 한 참가자분은 10월 5일 싱가폴에서 열리는 익명의 대형 트레이딩 대회에 결승멤버로 참가할 자격과 숙박권, 항공권을 얻게 됩니다!(총 상금 $10K+) 트레이더s 🔤Lighter Team ;BFOX - 생각 정리 하는 방 🤩Extended Team ; 고따 - Goraetracker 🔤Variational Team ; 크립토메이지 - 크립토메이지 🔥Aster Team ; 동타니 - 동타니와 근성 노력 열정 ,,, 트레이딩 시간은 30분이며, 간단한 규칙과 온라인…
❤7
Garrett Jin 포지션 업데이트 지난 2월 비트코인이 60K까지 떨어지던 구간에서 이더리움 롱을 20만개 넘게 치고 장렬하게 청산당했던 김가렛 형님. 그의 지난 지갑 청산 금액은 약 -2억불, 한화 약 3000억 규모 비트 롱 물려있던거 반등하면서 all time pnl 양전했는데.. $ZEC도 덩달아 떡상하면서 숏친거 나락가는중 ㅋㅋ 비트는 전량 익절하고 지캐시만 숏 홀딩. ZEC 숏 📉 평단가 $576 / 약 4만개 숏 / 청산가 $2,540 #GarrettJin
❤22🐳6
이더리움 고배율 롱에 베팅한 두 고래들. 0X0392...D7D9 ETH 롱 📈 평단가 $2,486 / 약 4.5만개 롱 / 청산가 $2,174 MachiBigbrother ETH 롱 📈 평단가 $2,428 / 약 3.8만개 롱 / 청산가 $2,298 BTC 롱 📈 평단가 $78,261 / 약 420개 롱 / 청산가 $62,057 진짜 무지성 롱만 먹여주는 상승장이 왔구나.
❤22🐳7
팩트 체크) 금일 SEC 의장 폴 앳킨스가 "클래리티 액트가 2주 안에 통과되길 희망한다" 발언한게 크립토씬에서 "2주 내에 통과된다"로 확정이라는듯 부풀려지고 있는 것 같은데 현재 폴리마켓 기준 시장 투자자들이 베팅하는 연 내 클래리티법 통과 확률은 약 15%로 점점 낮아지는 중... 물론 미국의 핵심 규제 기관인 SEC(증권)와 CFTC(파생상품) 모두 "클래리티 액트 통과 지연되더라도 우리 권한 내에서 자체 규칙 제정해 크립토 지원 사격 해준다"고 밀어붙이고 있는데 금일 폴 앳킨스의 발언을 제대로 확인해보면 1) 9/15에 상원이 클로저 투표 통과시켜서 -> 상원 본회의까지 통과한 뒤 -> 트럼프 서명 받기를 희망 2) 근데 통과 안되도 SEC는 기존에 말했듯 자체 룰로 지원 사격한다 3) 근데 결국 지속 가능하려면 클래리티 액…
❤18🐳3
아무리 불장이더라도 털건 털고 가야지? 이더리움 고배율 롱에 베팅한 두 고래들. 0X0392...D7D9 ETH 롱 📈 평단가 $2,486 / 약 4.5만개 롱 / 청산가 $2,253 MachiBigbrother ETH 롱 📈 평단가 $2,443 / 약 3.4만개 롱 / 청산가 $2,333 BTC 롱 📈 평단가 $77,372 / 약 440개 롱 / 청산가 $73,817 얘네들 물량이 커서 분할 청산까지 고려하면 $2,200 밑으로 푹찍 하거나 아니면 얘네들 다 먹여주면서 이더리움 $3,000가는 대불장 시작이거나?
❤28🐳1
이번 반등때 고래들은 어떻게 하고 있나.. 쭉 찾아보다가 작년에 핫했던 비고숏 형님 근황 알려드림. 현재까지 누적 수익 +$64.8M (약 908억) 25년 9월 최대 2,041 BTC 숏 → 10월 6일 비트 사상최고 $126,297 맞으면서 평가손실 -$27.2M 까지 갔다가 26년 2월 11일 $66,954에 전량 청산 지갑 다 뒤졌는데 BTC 현물 0개, ETH도 스테이킹 468개가 전부. 번 돈은 전부 스테이블로 잠금 (Sky sUSDS $17.2M, Aave·Morpho 회전) 그나마 있던 선물 포지션도 미장 위주(나스닥100·S&P500·애플 롱, SK하이닉스만 숏) 크립토엔 방향성 베팅이 아예 없는데, 딱 하나 남겨놨음. 50 BTC를 20배로 $50,525에 사겠다는 매수 지정가. 비트가 사이클 저점 $58,160 찍던…
❤35🐳6
저때도 헷징 숏 친게 110K 부근이었음. 수천억 운용하는 놈들인데 너무 뻔하게 현물 사자마자 1배숏으로 헷징치지는 않았을테고... 어느정도 올라서 변곡이라 판단되는 가격대에서 헷징을 시도 하지 않았을까? 하는 뇌피셜을 써놨었음. 참고로 펀비로만 몇백억 빨고 다 정리했음.
❤22🐳6
참고로 Abraxas 는 지금처럼 클로드 딸깍이 없던 시절부터 있던 형님들인데 작년 대불장때 1억좌, 5천만좌로 라벨링해놓고 이 불장대 숏치는 돈 많은 병신으로 기억했었다는 일화..(근데 지나고 보니 신이었음) 결과적으로 10월 10일 이후 하락을 헷징으로 잘 피했으니 ㅋㅋ
❤14🐳4
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @Goraetracker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
비트코인의 운명
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
요새 AI로 각자 하리 고래들 추적하는거같아서 채널에 굳이 안올렸는데 다시 그래도 업로드해볼까요.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“고래 따먹자│Goraetracker” (@Goraetracker), 9,658 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Goraetracker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.