Ribbit Capital "power letter" AI 투자에 많은 관점을 제공해주는 논문 https://www.ribbitcap.com/perspective

Channel
그냥 꼬맹
@Dove262
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,105subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002111377812 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dove262 |
| Created | 22 January 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dove262 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 3,105 | +4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 3,101 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 3,100 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 3,095 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 3,094 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 3,087 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 3,085 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 3,084 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 3,079 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 3,081 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Moonshot AI raises $3.5 BILLION at $35 BILLION valuation https://x.com/ns123abc/status/2082403533555483004?s=20 젠슨황과 중국이 이끄는 DeAI에 대해서 더욱더 집중해야 될떄인거같습니다 연구좀 더해보고 괜찮은 프젝들좀 올려볼께요 DeAI쪽은 파고들수록 토큰에 하나씩 결함이 있음
MetaDAO는 크립토의 본질적인 문제인 토큰의 지분과 주권에 도전중입니다 수많은 런치패드가 있지만 결국 증명하는 런치패드는 MetaDAO입니다 제로섬 게임에선 저평가에 베팅을
Rialto에서 런치패드 내놓는거 같은데 Rialto = 로빈후드 적폐라인 이러면 pons는 자연적으로 밀려날꺼같은데 https://x.com/launchonvaro
대토큰화 시대의 브로커 역할이 굉장히 불리쉬하다 UNI , AERO LFG Aerodrome은 Aero 출시가 9월로 밀렸습니다
코인베이스에 상장된 토큰이 왜 업비트에 상장되는지 안다면 클래리티를 이해한것 study MetaDAO
GEODNET 6월30일 채굴 반감기 이후 처음으로 buyback/burn 이 채굴보상을 crossover 중입니다 어제 글도 하나 써뒀네요 https://x.com/JumperKid_0/status/2080901449278775699?s=20
브라질 농부들이 유제품 소를 블록체인 기반 담보로 토큰화하여 대출을 확보하고 있습니다 https://x.com/Cointelegraph/status/2080579115036320252?s=20 토큰화의 잠재력은 엄청나다 존재가치가 있는 모든것들은 토큰화가 가능하다 추상적인 개념에서 점점 현실로 다가오고있다 투자자 입장에선 어떤곳에 집중해야될까 크립토는 아직까진 제로섬이다 모든 자산은 순환한다 저평가에 베팅을
Delphi 쪽 직원이 $PONS 실시간 소각 대쉬보드 만들었네요 https://x.com/that1618guy/status/2080136327421624789?s=20 https://stateofblocks.com/dashboards/pons-burn-monitor/
Ramp Router 출시랑 Open Router 인수 찌라시 돌면서 또다시 Venice에게 집중된건지 VVV가 오르긴했네요 얼마전 Tokenomics Overhaul 효과도 있긴한거같은데 (API credit 수요에 대한 VVV burn 추가) 추론경쟁 빡세네요 VVV는 듀얼지분 이슈만 잘넘어가면 풀매수 할거같긴한데
소문에 의하면 Anthropic이 Physical Intelligence 인수를 논의 중...😐 https://x.com/TheHumanoidHub/status/2078708600827207829?s=20
DeAI 서사가 강력해지고 있네요 https://x.com/arena/status/2077824029126504525?s=20 개인적으로 Base체인은 밈보단 유틸쪽으로 유동성이 들어와야 크게갈거라 생각중인데 Base체인 DeAI쪽 애들이 자리가 좋네요 Dot , Reppo , Serv 등
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Dove262. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@cryptocurrencymage · 9,3594 posts꿀찾는 양말이 Super N 크립토 일기장 ⚡️
@Honeyofwhitesocks_2 · 10,6473 posts싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 10,4722 posts매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것
@waitstudy · 19,4152 posts뭐 재밌는거 있냐?
@bbiddulCRYPTO · 1,1901 post정열맨김봉봉
@bongbong_crypto · 2,9021 post코인맵핵 🎈
@centurywhale · 16,5471 post디지털 장난감 유치원 - 다계반
@ddcave · 2431 post디노디노(DinoDino)
@dinoxdino · 1671 post암호화폐 연구소
@ishowcrypto7 · 661 postManbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 15,9791 post무사시의 코인 베기 (KDP_DAO)
@kdp_dao · 5,0411 postLiquid Official KR
@Liquid_Official_KR · 1051 post마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,8511 postMid-curve Research
@mid_curve · 7811 post잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 26,1051 post신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,4571 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Dove262 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 26 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“그냥 꼬맹” (@Dove262), 3,105 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dove262.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.