받으라슈) 재정경제부, 가상자산 소득과세 시행 2년 유예 공식 확정

Channel
캇즈의 크립토 노트📝☕️
@Katzenote
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,442subscribers
-374 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001679635363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Katzenote |
| Description | 바이브코딩, 에어드랍작, 시장 전반에 대한 아이디어들을 공유해봅니다. 협업 문의 : @crypto_katze Inquiry : [email protected] - 채팅방 (질문은 여기로) https://t.me/katzechat0 - 유튜브 https://www.youtube.com/@cryptokatze - 블로그, 트위터, 거래소 수수료 할인 https://linktr.ee/cryptokatze |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Katzenote |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:10 | 6,442 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:04 | 6,450 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 6,458 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:26 | 6,465 | -10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:08 | 6,475 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:40 | 6,484 | -16 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 6,500 | -11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 21:45 | 6,511 | -6 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 20:58 | 6,517 | -30 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 18:39 | 6,547 | -21 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 6,568 | -68 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 6,636 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 6,647 | -8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 6,655 | -8 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 6,663 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:14 | 6,680 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 6,696 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 6,703 | -16 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 6,719 | -22 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 6,741 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.95%
- avg views ÷ 6,442 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 190
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.583%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (15 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,985 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,740
- Videos
- ≈20
- Links
- ≈1,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 47.1% | |
| custom 5235607297517953867 | 7 | 41.2% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 11.8% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
난리난 니케 해킹 근황 - 니 컴퓨터에서 임의의 프로그램을 실행할 수 있었음 (바이러스 포함) - 니 컴퓨터에서 임의의 파일을 다운받을 수 있었음 - 니 컴퓨터에서 스크린샷을 찍어서 보낼 수 있었음 - 니 컴퓨터 장비 목록(CPU, RAM 등)을 보낼 수 있었음 - 니 컴퓨터에서 일반적으로 비밀번호, 암호화폐 지갑, 인증정보가 저장되는 곳들 털어서 보낼 수 있었음 니케를 깔았으면, pc내 모든게 다털렷다고 보면된다고함. 자세한 내용은 디시 니케갤러리 참고
[해외 거래소서 미국 주식 무기한 선물로 돈 벌면 양도세 11%] 내년부터 해외 가상자산거래소를 통해 미국 주식 연계상품인 무기한 선물에 투자해 돈을 벌면 세율 11%의 세금이 매겨진다고 매일경제가 단독 보도했다. 미국 주식 연계 무기한 선물은 올해부터 본격적으로 등장하기 시작한 파생상품으로 그동안 뚜렷한 과세 방침이 드러나지 않았다. 2일 관가에 따르면 세제당국인 재정경제부는 미국 주식 연계 무기한 선물을 해외주식 파생상품으로 분류하고, 양도소득세 과세 대상에 올리기로 결정했다. 다만 세율은 해외 현물 주식(22%)의 절반인 11%를 적용한다. 연간 수익에서 250만원을 기본공제한 금액에 세금을 매긴다. https://coinness.com/news/1173974 원문보기: https://www.mk.co.kr/news/economy/121…
☑️KAST 포인트 시스템 11월 30일 이후 종료 KAST 앱의 티어 화면에서 더 이상 포인트를 안 보여준다고 합니다. 🤔 그렇다면 우리의 포인트는? - 포인트 고래는 토큰 대신 주식 연동 지분을 받으며, 마지막 펀딩 라운드 가격으로 책정 - 소량의 포인트 유저는 고정 캐시 지급 받음 - 예시: 10,000 포인트 = $800 세부 사항은 12월 첫 2주 안에 공개한다고 합니다. 한 7천 포인트인가? 있는거 같은데 그거라도 돌려 Dao~👉👈
https://binance-hack-watch.vercel.app/ 해커 대시보드인데 사이트 켜놓으면 알트 뭐 파는지 계속 알람 옴. 알뜰살뜰 잘 파네;;
[ 간밤에 있던 일 대충 정리 ] 자기 전에 분위기 좋았는데 일어나니 가격이 좀 이상하죠.. 지금부터 하는 말을 놀라지 말고 잘 들으세요 1/ 간밤에 인텔이 실적발표 이후 주가 -22%을 맞았습니다. 2/ 바이낸스가 해킹을 당했습니다. 출금도 되지 않는 상태입니다. 3/ 존나 크게 해킹당했습니다. 역사상 압도적 최대 해킹이었던 바이빗 해킹이 1.5B이 안됐는데 바이낸스 해킹은 현재 추정되기로 거의 6B정도가 해킹되었습니다.... 4/ 다행히 해킹된 자산중 3B에 가까운 금액의 자산이 동결처리가 되었습니다. 5/ 하지만 계속해서 각종 알트가 덤핑대고 있고, 비트나 이더같은건 애초 동결도 안되는 자산입니다.... 6/ 짱펑자오는 해킹이 맞긴 하고, 털린 자금에 대해서는 충분히 감당할 수 있다고 트윗을 한 상태입니다 7/ 제일 궁금…
인터레스팅
하이퍼리퀴드 $HYPE 하루 20% 진짜에요?
FED LEAVES RATES UNCHANGED AT 3.75-4%
🟢 Predict.fun 토크노믹스 공개 ✅ 토크노믹스 -발행량:1B -Ecosystem & Community (51.95%) -Early Backers (26.05%) -Core Contributors (10%) -Treasury (8%) -Liquidity (4%) ✅ 에어드랍 할당 -시즌 1 에어드랍 할당: 7% -즉시신청시 35%만 수령 가능 -12개월 분할 베스팅 100% 지급 https://x.com/predictdotfun/status/2115328311752868024?s=46&t=d_IBmLzxPX7G4JNxxEJ6TA
그리고 요즘 Perpdex쪽들 거래량이랑 실체결수요 따져보고 있는데 정말 상위 몇몇 프로덕트빼고 지금 거의 의미있는 실체결 수요랑, 거래량이 없다고 보고 있음. 하이퍼리퀴드가 Tradfi 예외로 둘만한게, 코어위에 빌딩을 하려는 수요가 견고하고, fomo같은 팀뿐만 아니라 ai agent 수요가 들어오면서 유동성이 견고한것이 비해 우리가 잘 알고 있는 Perpdex들은 거의 전멸한 것 같네.. 자금 끌고 들어와서 파킹해놓은 상위지갑들과 마켓메이커, 퀀트봇 돌아가는 것 제외하면 현재 perpdex의 거래량 수요는 거의 없다고 보임. 이게 저점의 신호가 될 수 있겠지만 신규 펍덱 저점 잡으려는 플레이를 몰빵해서 치면 안된다는 시그널이라고도 느낌. 애초에 주식시장 자체가 너무 극악의 난이도를 달리고 있는 와중인데, 신규자금이 흘러들어올 여력이…
https://m.blog.naver.com/101u202/224455813594 돌곰배 이사람 요즘 뭐하나 했더니 로블록스 게임 만들어서 돈복사중이었네 ㄷㄷ 진짜 보법이 다르다
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Katzenote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,1274 posts머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,7333 posts저스트코인
@JUSTCRYT · 3,0382 postsManbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 16,4122 posts기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,2512 posts㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,4172 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,3721 postPlan G Research
@Plan_G_Research · 6,3111 post라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,8991 postTree News
@TreeNewsFeed · 35,4871 postAI 피봇 중(강복순)
@VVOON12 · 3,2791 post코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,2731 post돈포하 I Dont focus on hype
@Web3LearningWithInger · 6,2141 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,4941 postCOINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 30,4591 postEWL's doomscroll
@ewlreads · 7,2851 post코인씨커의 일기장
@honey_box_main · 5,3971 post룰루비데
@lululaladick · 2,3691 post내 부인 아르카나
@mywifeArcana · 1,6641 post머리나빠도 돈버는법
@nojobnoplan · 5,4071 post졸업준비위원회🎓
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,7091 post퀀텀 렐름
@qtrealm · 7411 post웹3 & AI 에이전트 광기 연구실
@ryotmadness · 1,9071 post우잭의 밈, AI 그외 잡설
@wojack_capital · 5921 post윤로그 공지방
@yunlog_official · 10,7531 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“캇즈의 크립토 노트📝☕️” (@Katzenote), 6,442 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Katzenote.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.