Channel photo updated

Channel
미국코인
@rolypopa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,625subscribers
+290 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001682527794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rolypopa |
| Created | 5 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rolypopa |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:45 | 10,625 | +1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:07 | 10,624 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:41 | 10,626 | +3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:56 | 10,623 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:44 | 10,624 | +19 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 10,605 | +18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:58 | 10,587 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 10,592 | +7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 10,585 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:50 | 10,584 | +9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 10,575 | +5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 10,570 | +18 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 10,552 | +22 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 10,530 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 10,538 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 10,545 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:34 | 10,551 | +13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:40 | 10,538 | +11 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:28 | 10,527 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:45 | 10,530 | first reading |
Engagement
83 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.7%
- avg views ÷ 10,625 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,730
- 35 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.829%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 36
- of 83 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 83 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 95,520 |
| Reactions total | 792 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 20:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,350
- Videos
- ≈7
- Links
- ≈477
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,388 reactions across 81 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,531 | 74.7% | |
| 🤯 | 358 | 10.6% | |
| 🥰 | 346 | 10.2% | |
| 😢 | 153 | 4.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,388 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 7
- of 81 we hold a reading for · 9%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rolypopa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
생각보다 크네요.. 국민연금도 5천억 물렸다고 함. 왜 이걸 대부분 다 안다루고있는거지??
🤯1
미국인 한테 물어보니까 오늘 증시 박는거 파라과이 은행 파산썰 때문인건가?? 음모론 펼치는데 맞나요??
🤯1
Spcx 올 클로즈 되었네요. 같이 타신분 축하드립니다.
👍15🥰1
설마 나스닥 써커스 브레이커는 아니지...??
🤯1
(받) 나스닥 마3룰 1. 매도 (위기 감지) 나스닥 종가가 하루 만에 -3% 이상 폭락하면 즉시 전량 매도 후 현금(달러) 보유. 2. 대기 (관망) 마지막 -3% 발생일로부터 1개월 + 1일 동안 추가 -3%가 안 뜨면 재진입. (중간에 또 터지면 대기 기간은 처음부터 다시 리셋) 3. 공황 (말뚝박기) 한 달 이내에 -3%가 4번 이상 터지면 ’공황‘으로 규정. 이때는 2개월간 -3%가 없어야 공황 종료로 보며, 그전까지는 고점 대비 낙폭(예: -30%, -40% 등)에 따라 기계적 분할 매수
👍1
MU 무 700 깨지기 5초전.. 실화냐 이거 내일 국장 사이드카 나오겠는데;;
👍9🥰2🤯1
최근 매매중에 가장 운이 좋았던 매매였던것 같네요. 대략 160불에 숏을 쳐서 평균 130불에 정리하는거 같은데. 곧 다 털려갑니다. 이게 다 털린다면 증시는 반등할거라고 믿습니다.
👍16
모든 증시가 하락을 하고있지만. 나 미국코인이 밀고있는 민주당에게 제일 기부를 많이한 구글만큼은 상승을 하고있다.
👍21🥰5
생각정리완료 제가 앞으로 한달간 메모리를 산다고 한다면 그것은 노망난것이니 걍 투자관점 맛탱이 간거라고 생각하고 거르시면 됩니다. 이거 떨어지는 칼날 잡으면 인생 후진기어 박고 풀악셀 밟는 느낌일듯
👍47🥰5🤯1
흠.. 고민이네요.. 마 10~20 % 즉 미장 하루이틀 더 박는다면 삼성전자의 매수희망가가 오긴하는데.. 구글에 비중이 많이 들어가버린지라... 무튼 삼전 18~16 이라인 되게 좋은 매수타점 같긴합니다만.. 전체 포트비중에서 현금이 40% 밖에 안남아서 좀 신중하게 할꺼같습니다. ( 아마 안살꺼같긴함)
👍40🤯5
마이크론 800불 깨졌네... 하닉 신저가 갱신 하려나... 그래도 어느정도 아구를 맞출꺼같은데... 대체로 하닉이랑 마이크론은 상관관계가 0.7이 넘었던걸로 기억하는데..
🤯14👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @rolypopa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@magonia_b · 26,246
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
@layergg · 19,333
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
@mujammin123 · 25,827
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,364
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@BChoSN · 26,372
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@murphybus · 19,935
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
@airdr0p_lab · 20,500
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“미국코인” (@rolypopa), 10,625 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rolypopa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.