Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,874–4,927 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 09:18
4,880
-5
14 Sept 2026, 15:20
4,885
-6
11 Sept 2026, 01:39
4,891
-6
6 Sept 2026, 03:01
4,897
+3
1 Sept 2026, 21:05
4,894
-1
29 Aug 2026, 23:17
4,895
+1
26 Aug 2026, 20:38
4,894
-8
24 Aug 2026, 05:24
4,902
-9
20 Aug 2026, 16:46
4,911
-7
18 Aug 2026, 02:33
4,918
+5
14 Aug 2026, 20:28
4,913
-4
8 Aug 2026, 13:58
4,917
-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:17
4,921
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 62 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
113 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
57
50.4%
👍
26
23.0%
🔥
17
15.0%
😢
6
5.31%
🤔
4
3.54%
🍓
2
1.77%
😭
1
0.885%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😃Perp-Dex Day with ReboundX 루마페이지 오픈
감사하게도 많은 이스포츠 트레이딩의 오리지널격이 된 콘텐츠를 KBW에서 더욱 크게 구성하게되었습니다! 아직 공개 안 된 파트너들부터 자리잡은 "진짜" 1티어 프로젝트들과 더욱 거대하고 파격적으로 온오프라인 혜택도 준비해보았습니다!
Perpdex섹터는 RWA를 업고 더욱 커질거라고 생각 중
트레이더 라인업, 굿즈 라인업, 행사 이벤트 부스 소식은 일단 신청해두시고 확인하기!
참가 프로젝트 라인업
Variational, Lighter, Aster, Extended
??? / ??? / ??? / ??? 곧 공개
정보
일시: 2026년 9월 28일 월요일
위치: 서울 강남 · 상세 주소는 승인자에게 개별 공개
인원: 600명 (승인 전용)
Event Highlights
-스…
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @heedan_memo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@heedan_memo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“희단이 메모장” (@heedan_memo), 4,880 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heedan_memo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
