이제는 떨어질 때 마다 용기를 내야 하는 시기 https://m.blog.naver.com/keumssoa/224467714124

Channel
용산의 현인
@petrojimmy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,012subscribers
+55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001767132321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @petrojimmy |
| Description | “톱 퀄리티 기업에 투자하라” "복리 수익의 힘을 알고 그것을 이루어내는 어려움을 이해하는 것이 투자의 심장이고 영혼이다." -찰리멍거 “성공은 단 하나, 나만의 방식으로 인생을 보낼 수 있는 것입니다.” - 크리스토퍼 모리 Vēnī. Vīdī. Vīcī. 결국, 우리는 승리할 것입니다. 문의: [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/petrojimmy |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 04:51 | 7,012 | -10 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:36 | 7,022 | -11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:06 | 7,033 | -11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 7,044 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 7,043 | +18 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:08 | 7,025 | -11 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 7,036 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 7,042 | -6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 7,048 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 03:15 | 7,049 | -12 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 7,061 | -9 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 7,070 | -12 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 7,082 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 7,098 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 7,100 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 7,108 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 7,106 | +22 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 7,084 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 7,081 | +55 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 7,026 | first reading |
Engagement
187 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.9%
- avg views ÷ 7,012 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,600
- 49 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.364%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 49
- of 187 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 187 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 78,547 |
| Reactions total | 162 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 17:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,720
- Videos
- ≈74
- Links
- ≈7,280
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 10s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
633 reactions across 93 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 207 | 32.7% | |
| 👍 | 117 | 18.5% | |
| 🔥 | 85 | 13.4% | |
| 👏 | 60 | 9.48% | |
| 🤪 | 34 | 5.37% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 3.95% | |
| 🤨 | 24 | 3.79% | |
| 🙈 | 17 | 2.69% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 2.37% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 2.05% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.948% | |
| 🎃 | 4 | 0.632% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 0.474% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 0.474% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.474% | |
| 🙊 | 3 | 0.474% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.474% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.474% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.316% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.316% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 0.632% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 187 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 187 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 49 posts held from the last 30 days (12.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
반등.. 이렇게 개미를 털어내는구나
👍8
이 바닥 전문가 없다
❤9
KT&G : 당일 발간리포트 - 12건 Buy : 10건 목표가 평균 : 247,400원 | 최대 : 280,000원 - 3분기 영업이익 5,301억원으로 시장 기대치 상회, 담배사업 수익성 개선 - 2026~2030년 연평균 두 자릿수 DPS 성장 및 주주환원 5조원 계획 - 투자의견 BUY 유지, 목표주가 264,000원으로 상향 조정 전망 (증권사 : 투자의견 / 목표가) 유안타 / Buy(유지) / 280,000원(유지) 키움 / Buy(유지) / 264,000원(상향) 한화 / Buy(유지) / 250,000원(유지) 다올 / Buy(유지) / 250,000원(유지) DS / Buy(유지) / 250,000원(유지) LS / Buy(유지) / 240,000원(상향) NH / Buy(유지) / 240,000원(상향) 하나 / Bu…
❤3👍1
정권이 바뀐다고 기술 트렌드가 사라지지는 않는다
👍8❤1
가락이 포지션 어제 줄여서 무리하지 마라고 조언했더니. 폭락 장을 알고 피한거였다..
❤2
제가 테크를 줄였던건 위와같은 이유도 있지만...신용을 썼었어서 여기서 더 밀리면 수익 다 반납하고 죽을수도 있겠구나 라는 생각도 있었습니다. (안쓰겠다고 다짐했는데....) 나는 공포에 팔지 않았다 라고 열심히 합리화를 하고 있었는데, 아는 형님이 솔직하게 얘기해주시더군요... 곰곰히 생각해보니 어느정도 저도 패닉셀한게 맞는거같습니다. 앞으로는 제 조빱같은 깜냥에 신용은 안써야겠습니다 ㅜ
👏6❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
11월 5일 장 후 코멘트: 공포 뉴스와 본질 DS투자증권 투자전략 양형모 코스피가 5.3% 내려 5,384가 됐습니다. 삼성전자 -7.6%, SK하이닉스 -9.5%, 외국인 순매도 3.4조 가운데 2.7조가 두 종목이었고 개인이 2.3조를 받았습니다. 이유는 중간선거 민주당 압승과 메타 사장의 "신규 데이터센터 건설이 매우 어려워진다"는 보도, 즉 AI 데이터센터를 못 짓게 된다는 공포입니다. 저는 그렇게 보지 않습니다. 지금 같은 시장에서 뉴스는 왜곡된 공포를 많이 내보냅니다. 조심해야 합니다. 맥코믹 사장의 원문은 "더 어려워질 것이다, 사실 이미 어려웠다"인데 국내 보도는 "매우 어려운 일이 될 것"이 됐고, 같은 인터뷰의 나머지는 빠졌습니다. "모든 하이퍼스케일러가 미국 밖에 지어야 하는지 고민한다"는 말은 당선인들에게 규제를…
🔥2👍1
#인사이트 #헤르만헤세 헤르만 헤세의 《싯다르타》에서 싯다르타가 친구 고비스타(고빈다)와 함께 ‘존귀한 자’라 불리는 부처, 즉 고타마의 가르침을 듣기 위해 기원정사(Jetavana)로 찾아가면서 시작된다. 당시 수많은 사람이 깨달은 자 고타마의 완벽한 인품과 가르침에 매료되어 그를 따르고 있었다. 싯다르타의 오랜 친구인 고비스타 역시 부처의 설법을 듣자마자 큰 감동을 받고 곧바로 머리를 깎고 그의 제자(승려)가 되기로 결심한다. 고비스타는 싯다르타에게도 함께 부처의 제자가 되어 귀의하자고 청한다. 수많은 제자와 수승한 스님이 부처의 둘레에 모여 그를 따르는 모습은 그야말로 완벽한 구도의 길처럼 보였다. 그러나 싯다르타는 제자로 남아 법을 배우는 길을 거절하고, 홀로 남아 고타마를 직접 찾아가 대화를 나눈다. 싯다르타는 부처의 …
❤5
다들 떠나고 나면 내가 주울게~
최태원 SK그룹 회장이 미국 중간선거 이후 나타난 증시 변동성과 관련해 과잉 유동성에 따른 자금 쏠림 현상을 주요 원인으로 지목해 주목된다. 특히 최 회장은 “코로나19 시절 돈이 많이 풀렸고 그 돈이 AI로 너무 많이 들어갔다”며 “충격은 작은데 유동성이 커지니 그 충격을 계속 증폭시킨다. 그래서 롤러코스터 시장이 계속되는 것”이라고 말했다. 최 회장은 5일 서울대 사회과학대학 김종섭홀에서 열린 ‘인공지능(AI) 시대, 세계 경제 패러다임의 변화와 대한민국의 비전’ 특강에서 미국 중간선거가 SK하이닉스를 비롯한 SK 계열사에 미칠 영향에 대한 질문에 대해 “정책도 그대로고 아직 아무것도 바뀐 것은 없는데 바뀔 것이란 생각만으로 시장이 과하게 반응한다. 이런 일은 앞으로 계속될 것”이라며 이같이 말했다. 특히 최 회장은 “중간선거가 어떻게…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 187 posts we hold for @petrojimmy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Kyaooo · 17,4657 posts재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,2166 posts너쟁이의 성실한 추추생활
@nje2e · 8,9565 posts주식 급등일보🚀급등테마·대장주 탐색기 | Korean Stocks
@FastStockNews · 128,8672 posts지식 책꽂이 (이대호 기자)
@knowledge_to_wealth · 14,3872 posts피카츄 아저씨⚡️
@pikachu_aje · 24,9402 posts실버만삭스의 루틴
@silvermansachs_routine · 7,8842 posts조기주식회 공부방
@EarlyStock1 · 24,3911 post투자핑
@Jayy2349 · 861 post텐렙
@Ten_level · 16,9961 post트러플
@Truffle9 · 701 post般若心經
@Zabopegdutide · 1351 post🚨별이네💎멍멍놀이터🔥
@byulEnae · 2,5661 post참새선생의 주식공부방
@coldbirdteacher · 3,7211 post스톡홀리데이
@dhk1567 · 341 post둥지새
@doongsae · 11 post프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,7061 postGromit 공부방
@grmtstudy · 3,5051 post인상주의 투자 인생 업그레이드노트
@insangnism · 11,2331 post묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,7761 post역발상 기개세
@nifaxiang · 1271 post제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver
@pharmbiohana · 29,7701 post레드버드 기업분석
@redbirdstock · 10,7441 post주식클라쓰_하창봉👍
@sharpha · 9,2881 post고봉밥의개똥곳간
@skankinben · 4,0751 post곽봉효의 경제적 카테나치오 형성
@ydygod · 1,8301 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 49 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@darthacking · 65,59010 posts머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,7435 posts루팡
@bornlupin · 49,2063 posts가락의 주식여행
@garaktrip · 623 posts선진짱 주식공부방
@sunstudy1111 · 55,1433 posts소중한추억.
@DOC_POOL · 13,4102 posts조기주식회 공부방
@EarlyStock1 · 24,3912 posts한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 16,6802 posts김치터미널
@KimchiTerminal · 6,0822 posts텐렙
@Ten_level · 16,9962 posts가치투자클럽
@corevalue · 67,1212 posts다영의 뉴스공장
@dynewscollecters · 3,1042 posts습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,2902 posts인상주의 투자 인생 업그레이드노트
@insangnism · 11,2332 posts미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 73,9342 posts점프
@jump0000 · 3,3702 postsYM리서치
@ym_research · 39,8562 postsAwake Korea 🇰🇷
@AwakeKOR · 4141 post64비트사령부⚡️ 🇰🇷🇺🇸
@BTCpentagon · 6,5601 post부자고양이
@DorisDD2033 · 4,3921 post[삼성 문준호의 반도체를 전하다]
@GlobalTechMoon · 6,9931 post오를주식 - 뉴스/경제/주식
@GoUpstock · 21,0921 post엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실
@Jstockclass · 26,5211 post캬오의 공부방
@Kyaooo · 17,4651 post[삼성 이영진] 글로벌 AI/SW
@Samsung_Global_AI_SW · 12,7351 post카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,0721 post재테크야간자율학습🌗
@capitalmosquito · 4,2511 post반붐온? 방붐온?
@cpshelter · 5,3791 post프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,7061 post가투방(DCTG) 저장소
@gatubang · 14,5421 postHarvey's Macro Story
@harveyspecterMike · 12,6031 post잠실개미&10X’s N.E.R.D.S
@jake8lee · 17,2331 post여고생 코쨩👉🔕
@jkkospi · 3,8001 post중도의 투자이야기
@joongdo · 4,8281 postepic AI - 투자 어시스턴트
@ked_epic_ai · 8,9701 post김찰저의 관심과 생각 저장소
@kimcharger · 25,2351 postKK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,1411 post교보 음식료/화장품 권우정
@kyobofnbcosmetic · 5,9681 post리브스메드
@livsmed · 1,1021 post제5원소의 잡다구레
@long_short_investing · 3321 post[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 24,6991 post묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,7761 postBrinK · 텔레모아 공식채널📈
@primestocknote · 2,0591 postPrivate Market Investors
@privatemarketinvestors · 4721 post감단투자
@sim_the_best · 1,9011 post[ IT는 SK ]
@skitteam · 18,2481 post스몰인사이트리서치
@smallinsightresearch · 5,8211 post타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,9431 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mistergray_11 · 19,768
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“용산의 현인” (@petrojimmy), 7,012 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petrojimmy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.