진짜네
👍2

Channel
@petrojimmy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,082subscribers
+125 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001767132321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @petrojimmy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/petrojimmy |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 7,082 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 7,098 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 7,100 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 7,108 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 7,106 | +22 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 7,084 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 7,081 | +55 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 7,026 | +31 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 6,995 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 6,993 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 7,005 | +27 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 6,978 | +21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 6,957 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 6,957 | first reading |
138 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 138 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
471 reactions across 63 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 132 | 28.0% | |
| 👍 | 87 | 18.5% | |
| 🔥 | 81 | 17.2% | |
| 🤪 | 34 | 7.22% | |
| 👏 | 32 | 6.79% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 5.31% | |
| 🤨 | 24 | 5.10% | |
| 🙈 | 17 | 3.61% | |
| 🤔 | 12 | 2.55% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.27% | |
| 🎃 | 3 | 0.637% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 0.637% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 0.637% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.637% | |
| 🙊 | 3 | 0.637% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.637% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.212% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.212% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.212% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 516 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
진짜네
👍2
요즘 계속 이 생각을 하게 되는데.. 외부세계를 잘 이해하는것만큼, 자기자신을 잘 알고 사람마다 그 환경에 어떻게 대처해야 하는지 요령을 숙지하고 반복 훈련해야 훈련한대로 할 수 있겠구나 싶습니다
❤3
양적완화 레츠고 https://newsmailer.einfomax.co.kr/view/content/AKR20260819174000016
마이크론테크놀로지는 장기적으로 초과현금(excess cash)의 100%를 주주에게 환원한다는 방침이다. 샌디스크도 사업에 필요한 투자를 우선한 뒤 남는 초과현금의 100%를 환원하기로 했다. 숫자만 보면 SK하이닉스의 '50% 이상'보다 높지만 기준은 다르다. SK하이닉스의 기준인 FCF는 영업활동으로 벌어들인 현금에서 설비투자(CAPEX)를 제외하고 남은 돈이다. 반면 초과현금은 사업 투자와 재무구조 유지 등에 필요한 자금을 고려하고도 남은 현금이다. 미국 업체의 '100%'가 FCF의 100%라는 의미는 아니다. https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/031/0001050875
김선우 위원 영상 좋네요 https://youtu.be/b6b994Lhx7w?si=oP_zyNbT6s9KQSfz
❤3
취득 기간('26.08.20 ~ '26.11.19) 총 92일 중 주말 및 법정 공휴일을 제외한 실제 영업일은 총 62일 40조 / 62일 = 6,452억이므로 일평균 6,452억이 순매수로 붙음
👍5👏1🤪1
증권사) SK증권 수수료 얼마벌어? SK증권 사요?
👍5
(출처:매일경제) 전자의 FCF 50%는 이제 센세이션하지 않다. 사업보국의 힘을 보여다오.
🔥7
삼성전자가 FCF 100% 해주면 하이닉스도 맞춰갈듯 이재용 화이팅
❤13😁1
자랑스런 닉스 보유국. PM좌 앞으로도 부탁해.
❤11
주주환원은 멀티플을 건드는 요소
닉스가 자사주 매입하니 미장이 움직이네
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @petrojimmy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“용산의 현인” (@petrojimmy), 7,082 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petrojimmy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.