이란, 이스라엘의 레바논 남부 산악지대 공세 시 강력 대응 경고 https://m.stock.naver.com/investment/news/worldnews/fnGuide/2729729 [관련 종목] S-Oil | 대한항공 | 한국전력

Channel
머니서퍼🏄🏻♂️ 가장빠른 주식뉴스📈
@moneythemestock
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,141subscribers
-101 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001566756459 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moneythemestock |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moneythemestock |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 18,141 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 18,145 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 18,146 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 18,147 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 18,156 | -13 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 18,169 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 18,171 | +11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:13 | 18,160 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:25 | 18,164 | +15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 18,149 | +18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 18,131 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 18,133 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 18,140 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 18,139 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 18,142 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 18,151 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 18,161 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 18,164 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 18,174 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 18,176 | first reading |
Engagement
567 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.32%
- avg views ÷ 18,141 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,150
- 242 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.126%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 244
- of 567 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 57 of 242 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 567 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 277,628 |
| Reactions total | 89 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
256 reactions across 136 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 106 | 41.4% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 15.6% | |
| 😱 | 24 | 9.38% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 2.73% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 2.73% | |
| 😘 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 1.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 567 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 567 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
삼성바이오로직스, 3조원 유증으로 2034년까지 15조4000억원 투자 추진 https://m.stock.naver.com/investment/news/flashnews/648/0000050456 [관련 종목] 삼성바이오로직스
미 고용부진·엔화 강세에 원·달러 환율 14개월 만에 1,350원대 https://m.stock.naver.com/investment/news/flashnews/421/0009149854 [관련 종목] 대한항공 | 한국전력 | 삼성전자 | 현대차
🚀 [KRX 상승률 TOP10] 2026-09-03 15:30 (KST) - 거래소: KRX / 시간: 정규장 1) 알트 (29.86% / 350억) 2) 신스틸 (29.86% / 115억) 3) 라온피플 (29.84% / 23억) 4) 원익 (18.98% / 1,252억) 5) 파이온엑스 (18.70% / 5억) 6) 파인엠텍 (18.43% / 639억) 7) 녹십자웰빙 (17.01% / 1,124억) 8) 금강철강 (16.94% / 463억) 9) 제넥신 (14.92% / 107억) 10) 아진엑스텍 (14.29% / 483억)
🚀 [KRX 상승률 TOP10] 2026-09-03 14:30 (KST) - 거래소: KRX / 시간: 정규장 1) 알트 (29.86% / 345억) 2) 신스틸 (29.86% / 114억) 3) 라온피플 (29.84% / 23억) 4) 원익 (25.90% / 1,024억) 5) 동일스틸럭스 (24.69% / 92억) 6) 녹십자웰빙 (21.56% / 1,009억) 7) 제넥신 (17.23% / 101억) 8) 금강철강 (16.21% / 422억) 9) 파인엠텍 (15.98% / 589억) 10) KS인더스트리 (14.69% / 11억)
한화오션, 1조5000억원대 컨테이너선 수주에 7% 급등 https://m.stock.naver.com/investment/news/flashnews/011/0004658255 [관련 종목] 한화오션 | HD한국조선해양 | 삼성중공업
머니서퍼🏄🏻♂️ 가장빠른 주식뉴스📈 pinned «미국 10년물 4.8%. 일본 10년물 3% 돌파. 기관투자자 10명 중 7명은 "한 달 뒤 금리 더 오른다"고 답했습니다. 그런데도 기관 74%는 국채보다 주식을 선택했어요. 시장이 주목하는 답, 바로 은행·보험주. 리포트에서 확인하세요👇 [머니서퍼 PLUS]»
미국 10년물 4.8%. 일본 10년물 3% 돌파. 기관투자자 10명 중 7명은 "한 달 뒤 금리 더 오른다"고 답했습니다. 그런데도 기관 74%는 국채보다 주식을 선택했어요. 시장이 주목하는 답, 바로 은행·보험주. 리포트에서 확인하세요👇 [머니서퍼 PLUS]
🚀 [KRX 상승률 TOP10] 2026-09-03 13:30 (KST) - 거래소: KRX / 시간: 정규장 1) 동일스틸럭스 (30.00% / 78억) 2) 신스틸 (29.86% / 114억) 3) 라온피플 (29.84% / 22억) 4) 금강철강 (23.02% / 401억) 5) KS인더스트리 (21.91% / 10억) 6) 제넥신 (19.36% / 82억) 7) 녹십자웰빙 (17.88% / 704억) 8) 전진건설로봇 (17.40% / 258억) 9) 엠아이큐브솔루션 (17.19% / 107억) 10) 미스터블루 (16.23% / 83억)
🚀 [KRX 상승률 TOP10] 2026-09-03 12:30 (KST) - 거래소: KRX / 시간: 정규장 1) 신스틸 (29.86% / 114억) 2) 라온피플 (29.84% / 22억) 3) 동일스틸럭스 (26.02% / 61억) 4) 금강철강 (21.36% / 351억) 5) KS인더스트리 (21.01% / 6억) 6) 파인엠텍 (20.75% / 519억) 7) 엠아이큐브솔루션 (19.68% / 99억) 8) 미스터블루 (18.44% / 80억) 9) 원익 (18.28% / 566억) 10) 힘스 (17.81% / 5억)
❤1
가스공사·석유공사 통합 및 지역항만 4곳 통합 추진 https://m.stock.naver.com/investment/news/flashnews/011/0004658209 [관련 종목] 한국가스공사
이란 전쟁 격화로 민간인 사망자 우려 고조 https://m.stock.naver.com/investment/news/worldnews/fnGuide/2729437 [관련 종목] S-Oil | SK이노베이션 | 흥구석유
Showing the 12 most recent of 567 posts we hold for @moneythemestock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@stock_messenger · 25,581
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,921
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“머니서퍼🏄🏻♂️ 가장빠른 주식뉴스📈” (@moneythemestock), 18,141 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moneythemestock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.