정말 제정신이 아닌 사람이네요. 지금 '90주' 넘게 부동산 가격이 오르고 있는 신기록을 세우고 있는 상황인데요. 지금 걱정인건, 완전히 잘못된 통계와 잘못된 신념을 가지고 나라의 정책을 짜고 있는데, 그게 하필 최고 컨트롤 타워인 대통령이라는 점입니다. 어어?? 드르르륵.... 드르르르륵..... (드럼통 굴러오는 소리) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/020/0003759666?sid=100
❤8

Channel
@Dynastylabs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,363subscribers
-171 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001254446072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dynastylabs |
| Description | 주로 차트를 기반으로 운영하며, 코인판에서 도움이 되는 트렌드, 정보를 공유합니다. ▶️채널 안내 메인 채널 : @DynastyLabs 채팅방 : @Dynastychat 💬Admin : @Matteo_Dynasty |
| Created | 24 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dynastylabs |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:30 | 6,363 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:29 | 6,369 | -13 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 6,382 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 6,390 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 6,400 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:09 | 6,406 | -10 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 6,416 | -6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 07:59 | 6,422 | -5 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 6,427 | -7 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 6,434 | -9 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 6,443 | -10 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:42 | 6,453 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 6,458 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 6,467 | -10 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 6,477 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 6,492 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 6,504 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 6,507 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 6,513 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 6,522 | first reading |
72 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 72 (2 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 8,859 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 00:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
158 reactions across 46 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 114 | 72.2% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 7.59% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 5.70% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 5.06% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 3.80% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.16% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
정말 제정신이 아닌 사람이네요. 지금 '90주' 넘게 부동산 가격이 오르고 있는 신기록을 세우고 있는 상황인데요. 지금 걱정인건, 완전히 잘못된 통계와 잘못된 신념을 가지고 나라의 정책을 짜고 있는데, 그게 하필 최고 컨트롤 타워인 대통령이라는 점입니다. 어어?? 드르르륵.... 드르르르륵..... (드럼통 굴러오는 소리) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/020/0003759666?sid=100
❤8
일봉 주봉 월봉을 종합해보면 1. $80K / $87K의 저항을 돌파하는지 2. $74K~$71.5K의 지지가 유지되는지 3. 거래량이 여기서 붙는지 이 3가지를 주안점으로 보고 대응해가면 되는 장입니다.
❤4
비트코인 월봉 차트입니다. 9월과 10월의 상승이 있었지만, 26년 1월 하방이탈하였던 중기 이동평균선을 뚫지는 못하였습니다. 현재는 단기 이동평균선의 지지와 중기 이동평균선의 저항 사이에 끼어있는 형국으로 해석할 수 있으며, 단기 이동평균선은 직전에 공유드린 주봉 차트에서의 지지구간과 근사한 $71.5K부에 위치해있습니다. 그렇기에 $71.5K의 지지가 보다 중요하다고 해석할 수 있습니다.
❤3
비트코인 주봉 차트입니다. 8월 17일의 양봉으로 역헤숄 넥라인 상방 돌파 이후, 66K에서 87K까지 약 31.8% 추가 상승하였습니다. 이후 현재 5개째의 음봉이 진행중이며, 오르는데 걸렸던 시간과 비슷하게, 비슷한 기간과 비슷한 레인지로 조정이 진행중입니다. 주봉상의 단기적인 지지대는 양운대 하단인 $74.8K부가 있으나, 그리 신뢰도가 높아 보이지 않습니다. 제대로된 지지로 작용할 수 있는 부분은 $74K~$71.5K 부로 보여지며, 이는 2024년 11월의 급등 이전의 저항대입니다.
❤1
비트코인 일봉 차트입니다. 9월 21일과 10월 5일 종가 기준의 더블 탑을 형성하고 약 한달이란 시간을 걸쳐서 추가적인 하락이 진행되고 있습니다. 10월 30일의 하락으로 하단에 위치한 장기 이동평균선까지 찍고 단기적인 반등이 진행되고 있는 상태이나, 바로 위인 $79K 부근에 단기 이동평균선을 두고 있습니다. $80K를 넘어서는 상승이 나온다면 단기 이동평균선을 상회하고 이전 단기적인 반등이 진행되었던 저점들도 회복하는 것이라 보다 긍정적으로 해석가능하겠습니다. 다만 현재까지는 하락시 발생했던 거래량의 반절 조차 되지 않는 거래량으로 단기적인 반등이 진행된터라, 언제든 추가적인 하락이 가능함을 염두해두고 임해야합니다.
❤1
클로드 플랜 이름 변경 및 5시간 제한 제거
🥰5
창펑 : SAFU 과연...
😍4
🚨🚨🚨바이낸스 5조원 어치 해킹 발생 현재까지만 해도 사상 최대 해킹인 바이빗 피해금액의 약 2배 https://x.com/Dogetoshi/status/2115908240789656054
❤2
닐리언 차트 뒤늦게 복기해보면 1. 주봉에서 5월 거래량 터지면서 펌핑나왔던 것 2. 8월의 저점 구간에서 거래량은 터졌는데 가격 변동은 그렇게 터지지 않았던 것 이거 두 가지가 좀 긍정적인 신호로 해석될 수 있던게 아니였나싶네요. 하이프가 좋았던 종목들은 이렇게 시간차가 있더라도 한 번씩 다시 볼 필요성이 있는 것 같습니다.
❤5
아이고 닐리언 닐리언아.. 닐리언이 TGE하고 1년 9개월만에 업비트 원화마켓에 상장합니다.
❤🔥3
업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 닐리온(NIL) KRW 마켓 디지털 자산 추가 2026-10-27 16:30:00
https://n.news.naver.com/article/421/0009248122?sid=100 과세 유예 가즈아ㅏ
🙏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @Dynastylabs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
어떤 컨텐츠가 보고 싶으신가요?
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dynasty” (@Dynastylabs), 6,363 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dynastylabs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.