Channel
@crazzy_blockk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
715subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001855600255 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crazzy_blockk |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crazzy_blockk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 715 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 722 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 723 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 725 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 735 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 736 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 736 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
35 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 62.9% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 17.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CrazzyBView pinned «🚀 A new chapter begins. 🔓 Over the coming weeks, I'll be publishing original on-chain research, fresh datasets, quantitative market analysis, and institutional-grade insights focused on Bitcoin and digital assets. - This channel will become the primary place…»
🚀 A new chapter begins. 🔓 Over the coming weeks, I'll be publishing original on-chain research, fresh datasets, quantitative market analysis, and institutional-grade insights focused on Bitcoin and digital assets. - This channel will become the primary place for my latest research, ideas, and reports before they're shared elsewhere. - If you're here for signal over noise, you're in the right place. 🗳 Stay tuned—t…
👍3🔥1
👨💻As discussed in our recent analysis, our on-chain models had already signaled an increased probability of market volatility and elevated leverage risk. This is where data outperforms narratives—and why relying on objective metrics provides a significant edge. ⏰ We'll continue to expand the channel with more proprietary models, advanced on-chain insights, and important market developments to keep you informed with…
❤4
📊Is the Bitcoin bottom in? Here's what the data actually says! 🔖 BTC is down 52% from its October ATH, trading in the "Deep Value" zone of my RCV framework — a condition present only 6.7% of Bitcoin's entire history. A few things stand out: • CBCI at 3.52 — nearly identical to June 2022, five months before the final capitulation low • Three independent cost-basis cohorts (New Investors, LTH, Active Addresses) hav…
❤2🔥2
Why Exchange Leverage is Flashing a Deleveraging Warning? “The data shows that leverage deployment has stretched into the top 5% of historical extremes… Current market rally is built on borrowed margin that lacks the underlying spot liquidity to sustain it.” – Read More By Crazzyblockk | @cryptoquant_official
👍3
📊 Exchange Leverage Pulse — BTC (Jul 14, 2026) Comprehensive aggregation of Exchange BTC Open Interest relative to Exchange Stablecoin Reserves (USDT, USDC, DAI, BUSD, FUSD) 🟠 #BTC 🔍 Current ST_ELR: 0.3518 (MA20: 0.3374) — regime: HIGH_RISK / POTENTIAL_DELEVERAGING -The metric is 4.2% above the MA20 baseline and is currently compressing against the 2-Standard Deviation upper band (0.3653). -It remains 15.2% belo…
🔥3
📊 CEX Open Interest Structure — BTC / ETH / XRP (Jul 13, 2026) Full aggregation across Binance, Bybit, Gate.io, OKX, HTX Global, Deribit, Bitfinex, BitMEX. 477 daily observations, Mar 2025–Jul 2026. 🟠 #BTC 🔍 Total OI: $21.75B (7d: +2.13% | 30d: -4.65%) — regime: STABLE - Down 54.3% from the dataset peak of $47.58B, which printed Oct 6, 2025 — the same session BTC hit its price ATH of $126,198 - Only ~7% above the…
❤4
📣Binance Volume & Derivatives Structure — What the Data Actually Shows 🔍 Looking at Binance activity across the top 25 non-stablecoin assets (spot + futures combined, 7-day moving average, June 2024 to present), the clearest signal right now isn't in any single asset — it's in how volume is distributed. ❇️ BTC and ETH now account for 77.3% of total tracked volume, up from 65.3% just six months ago. Liquidity is co…
❤3🔥1
File, posted without a caption
❤2
📊USDT dry powder on centralized exchanges is in a seven-month slow bleed that almost nobody is pricing. 🔹Total USDT parked on CEXs sits at $53.06B. Down $1.20B over seven days, $1.05B over thirty. The peak was December 2025 at roughly $60.58B. Since then, $7.5B of potential BTC and ETH bid has walked out the door—12.4% of the entire buy-side liquidity complex gone in seven months. 🔹The headline hides the structural…
❤4
File, posted without a caption
❤3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @crazzy_blockk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CrazzyBView” (@crazzy_blockk), 715 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crazzy_blockk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.