Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for QCP Broadcast

Channel

QCP Broadcast

@QCPbroadcast

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,554subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001453658987
TypeChannel
Username@QCPbroadcast
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/QCPbroadcast

Growth

13,55413,64913,601.56 August 2026 — 13,649 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,649 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,648 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,646 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,642 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,639 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,635 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,633 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,629 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,621 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,614 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,609 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,606 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,601 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,593 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,589 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,586 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,582 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,581 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,580 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,577 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,575 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,571 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,562 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,560 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,556 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,554 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 28 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,540–13,663 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 10:5813,554-2
2 Sept 2026, 03:5513,556-4
1 Sept 2026, 00:4813,560-2
30 Aug 2026, 22:2313,562-9
29 Aug 2026, 20:4213,571-4
28 Aug 2026, 22:1313,575-2
27 Aug 2026, 22:1713,577-3
26 Aug 2026, 20:0213,580-1
25 Aug 2026, 23:1413,581-1
25 Aug 2026, 02:3413,582-4
23 Aug 2026, 15:0713,586-3
21 Aug 2026, 22:1513,589-4
20 Aug 2026, 19:2413,593-8
19 Aug 2026, 15:5913,601-5
18 Aug 2026, 18:3313,606-3
17 Aug 2026, 16:4513,609-5
16 Aug 2026, 08:3513,614-7
14 Aug 2026, 17:4613,621-8
13 Aug 2026, 10:1313,629-4
12 Aug 2026, 10:2413,633first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 13,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,320
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.272%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held29 (10 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total23,200
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

200 reactions across 29 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11055.0%
👍5025.0%
❤‍🔥199.50%
🔥157.50%
👌21.00%
🍾10.5%
🎉10.5%
🙏10.5%
🤯10.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,600 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

QCP Market Colour, 28 August 2026 $BTC heads into Jackson Hole around 80k, but tonight’s focus extends beyond whether Fed Chair Warsh sounds relatively hawkish or dovish. July PCE showed headline inflation at 3.7% YoY and core at 3.3%, leaving inflation above the Fed’s objective. At the same time, July’s 9–3 FOMC vote revealed a meaningful split, with three policymakers preferring a 25bp hike. Markets currently ass

7👍1

27 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC≈1,810 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

QCP Macro Themes - 27 August 2026 The Fed’s 9–3 hold marked its first triple-hawkish dissent since September 2016. The minutes and support from two non-voters suggest the hawkish bloc is broader than the tally, with further tightening possible if inflation stalls. Treasury doubled long-end buybacks from $2bn to $4bn per operation and increased them from two to four per quarter. Yields fell, but each operation repre

4👍3

24 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈2,190 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

QCP Market Colour, 24 August 2026 $BTC recorded its strongest week since March 2024, briefly reaching approximately 79.5k after gaining more than 20%. The move coincided with a sharp shift in rates. After the US 30-year Treasury yield approached 5.3%, its highest since 2007, Treasury announced that long-end liquidity-support buybacks would increase from a maximum of $2bn to at least $4bn per operation from 9 Septem

6👍1

21 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈2,340 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

QCP Market Colour, 21 August 2026 Duration is back at the centre of the crypto conversation. $BTC has moved from roughly 64k to towards 76k in four sessions, with the breakout coinciding with a sharp shift in long-end rates. After the US 30-year Treasury yield reached around 5.33%, its highest since 2007, Treasury announced that long-end liquidity-support buybacks would increase from a maximum of $2bn to at least $

👍41

19 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈2,260 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

QCP Macro Themes - 19 August 2026 China’s crude imports rebounded 22% MoM to 8.41 mb/d in July as Hormuz partially reopened and supply shifted toward Russia and pipelines, but volumes remain 24% below last year. Inventories have also fallen from 1.40bn barrels in December to 1.20bn in July. The drawdown is accelerating, with stocks down ~940k b/d, including a 41mb drop in June. Hormuz flows also remain fragile afte

👍5

17 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC≈2,470 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

QCP Market Colour, 17 August 2026 BTC remains near the lower end of its recent range as softer US growth data compete with persistently elevated energy prices. Friday's data showed preliminary consumer sentiment falling to 51.0, while July retail sales declined 0.6%, their largest monthly drop in more than a year. Together with softer labour data, that has helped bring the market-implied probability of a September

4👍2🎉1

14 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,510 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

QCP Market Colour, 14 August 2026 BTC has moved back towards 63k, returning to the lower end of its recent range despite a softer US inflation backdrop. July CPI eased to 3.4% YoY, core inflation moderated to 2.5%, and PPI was flat on the month — but crypto's response has remained muted. That leaves the theme from last week largely intact: resilience without momentum. BTC has continued to absorb a weaker labour mar

4👍2

12 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,450 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

QCP Macro Themes - 12 August 2026 The Fed held rates at 3.50%–3.75% for a fifth consecutive meeting, but the 9–3 vote revealed its deepest split since September 2016. Three dissenters argued that persistent inflation and a resilient labour market warranted earlier action, while reduced forward guidance has made each meeting harder to price. Markets still assign a 57% chance of a September rate cut, even as the 30-y

5

7 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈2,980 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

QCP Market Colour, 7 August 2026 BTC has recovered from around 62.5k at the start of the week to trade back near 64k. The move stands out less for its momentum than for what the market has absorbed: Strategy sold 1,638 BTC for approximately $105m, while reported losses from the Coldcard security incident have risen to around $110m. Neither event resulted in a sustained break lower. Options markets reflect a similar

6

5 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,590 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

QCP Macro Themes - 5 August 2026 The Fed held rates at 3.50%–3.75% for a fifth consecutive meeting, but the 9–3 vote revealed its deepest split since September 2016. Three dissenters argued that persistent inflation and a resilient labour market warranted earlier action, while reduced forward guidance has made each meeting harder to price. Markets are still assigning a 57% chance of a September rate cut, even as th

7

3 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈2,680 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

QCP Market Colour, 3 August 2026 The US has joined Japan in a rare coordinated effort to support the yen, with the New York Fed purchasing yen on behalf of the US Treasury during Friday’s operation. It was the first coordinated US–Japan FX intervention since 2011 and the first joint operation specifically supporting the yen since 1998. The timing puts the long end of the Treasury curve firmly in focus. The 30-year

8👍3🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC≈2,680 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

QCP Market Colour, 31 July 2026 The Fed held rates at 3.50%–3.75%, but three dissents in favour of a hike and Chair Warsh’s move away from explicit forward guidance gave the decision a hawkish tone. Markets initially responded by reassessing the path for rates. US equities sold off following the announcement before rebounding as earnings returned to the foreground, led by a sharp rally in Microsoft. BTC also moved l

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @QCPbroadcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Market News Feed
@marketfeed · 38,259
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
CryptoQuant
@cryptoquant_official · 55,950
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Wu Blockchain News
@wublockchainenglish · 243,083
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Glassnode
@glassnode · 44,346
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Kirby Crypto
@kirbycrypto · 40,303
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
infinityhedge
@infinityhedge · 45,858
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
unfolded.
@unfolded · 118,157
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
The Straits Times
@TheStraitsTimes · 269,404
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 11 August 2026
HDB
@singaporeHDB · 51,599
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
gov.sg
@Govsg · 239,518
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 August 2026
dateideas by TOS 💕
@dateideas · 60,291
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 August 2026
CNA
@cnalatest · 225,777
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
The Woke Salaryman
@thewokesalaryman · 34,460
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
TheSmartLocal
@TSLMedia · 46,200
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
SG Weekend Plans
@sgweekend · 85,739
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
Seedly Personal Finance SG
@personalfinancesg · 51,144
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
Tree News
@TreeNewsFeed · 34,753
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Investigations by ZachXBT
@investigations · 106,286
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
Coin Bureau
@CoinBureau · 117,730
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
The Business Times
@BizTimes · 46,315
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
Bloomberg
@bloomberg · 171,747
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Bitcoin.com News
@www_Bitcoin_com · 56,261
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Web3 Jobs
@web3hiring · 61,093
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QCP Broadcast” (@QCPbroadcast), 13,554 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QCPbroadcast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.