Crypto Daily™ is the leading crypto and blockchain news site that ‘bridges’ the gap between companies.
TT: https://www.tiktok.com/@officialcryptodaily
📩 [email protected]
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -9,192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,708–51,832 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:22
36,684
-181
16 Sept 2026, 05:16
36,865
-270
14 Sept 2026, 09:56
37,135
-308
12 Sept 2026, 16:59
37,443
-386
10 Sept 2026, 19:38
37,829
-4,827
7 Sept 2026, 18:00
42,656
-1,044
4 Sept 2026, 19:36
43,700
-191
3 Sept 2026, 06:16
43,891
-220
2 Sept 2026, 00:54
44,111
-460
31 Aug 2026, 23:39
44,571
-985
30 Aug 2026, 23:43
45,556
-741
30 Aug 2026, 01:56
46,297
-300
29 Aug 2026, 04:25
46,597
-159
28 Aug 2026, 05:46
46,756
-55
27 Aug 2026, 07:16
46,811
-77
26 Aug 2026, 06:54
46,888
-233
25 Aug 2026, 04:43
47,121
-107
24 Aug 2026, 00:05
47,228
-156
22 Aug 2026, 11:04
47,384
-121
20 Aug 2026, 23:24
47,505
first reading
Engagement
347 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 36,684 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,200
206 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.894%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
206
of 347 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 190 of 206 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
347 (4 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
1,277,890
Reactions total
10,475
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,100
Videos
≈7
Links
≈24,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
16,909 reactions across 302 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,411
20.2%
👍
3,403
20.1%
🎉
3,375
20.0%
🔥
3,332
19.7%
😁
3,295
19.5%
🤩
93
0.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 319 of the 347 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,821 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 347 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
US Prosecutors Probe Binance Over Potential Iran Sanctions Violations, Bloomberg Reports
U.S. prosecutors are reportedly examining whether Binance failed to stop Iran-linked trading, days after a $61 million crypto forfeiture action.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/us-prosecutors-binance-iran-sanctions-probe
#Binance #Sanctions #DOJ #CryptoNews #Iran
ECB Launches Pontes for Tokenized-Asset Settlement in Central Bank Money
The Eurosystem launched Pontes on September 21, enabling wholesale tokenized-asset settlements in central bank money through TARGET Services.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/ecb-pontes-tokenized-asset-settlement-central-bank-money
#ECB #Pontes #Tokenization #CentralBankMoney #TARGETServices
Coinbase Opens IPO Allocations to US Retail Users, Starting With Oura
Coinbase has opened conditional IPO allocation requests to eligible U.S. retail customers, starting with Oura's proposed Nasdaq listing and $40-$44 range.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/coinbase-retail-ipo-allocations-oura
#Coinbase #IPO #Oura #Nasdaq #CryptoNews
Bitcoin Hits $87,400 Local Top: How Deep Will the Correction Go?
The Bitcoin price hit a local top of $87,400 on Monday after another short but powerful rally out of a bull flag that added another $6,000. A pause is in force currently as this latest move is digested by the market. With the $BTC price now quite overbought, how far down could this corrective phase go?
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/bitcoin-hits-87…
Ethereum’s Summer Movements
While Part 1 mapped where capital sat as of early 2026, this analysis picks up the thread in June - when the summer cycle began - and traces how that capital actually moved through June 1 to September 1.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/ethereums-summer-movements
BlackRock’s ETF Chief Says Bitcoin’s Diversifier Case Still Holds as Volatility Cools
BlackRock says Bitcoin volatility has cooled, but its 0.53 S&P 500 correlation and history of deep drawdowns limit the case for a small allocation.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/blackrock-bitcoin-diversifier-volatility-correlation
#Bitcoin #BlackRock #ETFs #Portfolio #CryptoMarkets
Bastion Wins Conditional OCC Approval for a National Trust Bank Charter
Bastion won conditional OCC approval to convert into an uninsured national trust bank for stablecoin custody, USDC conversion and issuer services.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/bastion-conditional-occ-national-trust-bank-charter
#Bastion #OCC #Stablecoins #USDC #CryptoRegulation
Visa Moves to Close Credit-Card Rewards Loophole for Crossmint Memecoin Purchases
Visa is reportedly moving Crossmint memecoin purchases into crypto merchant codes, ending a classification that let some cardholders earn ordinary rewards.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/visa-crossmint-memecoin-card-rewards-loophole
#Visa #Crossmint #Memecoins #CryptoPayments #RobinhoodWallet
Bitcoin Approaches Key Higher High: Can It Break the Bear Market?
The Bitcoin price is only a matter of $1,000 or so from surpassing a key macro high that would be a huge step towards changing the macro trend from bearish to bullish. Could the price explode to the upside once this higher high is achieved?
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/bitcoin-approaches-key-higher-high-can-it-break-the-bear-market
#Bitcoin $BT…
ZetaChain Holders Back Solana Migration and Layer 1 Wind-Down in 99.4% Vote
ZetaChain Proposal 68 passed with 99.4% support, authorising a native ZETA migration to Solana and the start of its Layer 1 wind-down.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/zetachain-solana-migration-layer-1-wind-down-vote
#ZetaChain #ZETA #Solana #Governance #Layer1
Polymarket Faced $10M Fraud Attempt as Compliance Scrutiny Intensifies, WSJ Reports
Polymarket US reportedly faced a $10 million stolen-card fraud attempt in February, with a payment processor rejecting over 80% of deposits.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/polymarket-us-10m-stolen-card-fraud-attempt-wsj
#Polymarket #CryptoNews #Compliance #Fraud #CFTC
Hyperliquid Opens Manual Borrowing Against HYPE and Bitcoin Collateral
Hyperliquid has launched manual borrowing for HYPE and BTC collateral, reporting $269 million borrowed on day one as HYPE reached $90.92.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/09/hyperliquid-manual-borrowing-hype-bitcoin-collateral
#Hyperliquid #HYPE #Bitcoin #DeFi #CryptoLoans
🎉14🔥13👍9😁9❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 347 posts we hold for @officialcryptodaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRYPTO TREYSI @cryptotreysi · 34,027 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
Cryptoy ₿ @Cryptoy · 34,476 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
Analytics Insight @analyticsinsightmag · 34,642 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
CoinGape Crypto News @coingape · 22,968 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
BTC FOREX TRADING MONEY INVESTMENT @online_shopping_deal1 · 87,836 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 August 2026
Krypto | Finanzen | Politik @kryptodeutsch · 62,604 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Daily™” (@officialcryptodaily), 36,684 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/officialcryptodaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.