LATEST: 🚨 HP researchers discovered a fake AI-powered crypto trading bot that was spreading Needle Stealer malware, replacing browser crypto wallets with fakes to steal passwords and empty holdings.

Channel
CoinMarketCap Announcements
@CoinMarketCapAnnouncements
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
246,441subscribers
-7,284 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001364412069 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CoinMarketCapAnnouncements |
| Description | Official CMC Telegram Channel: Updates, News, and Events! Build with CMC (API, AI, Agent): https://coinmarketcap.com/api/resources/cmc-toolkit |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CoinMarketCapAnnouncements |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 246,441 | -319 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 246,760 | -244 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 247,004 | -317 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 247,321 | -479 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 247,800 | -599 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 248,399 | -349 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 248,748 | -251 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:48 | 248,999 | -203 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:33 | 249,202 | -207 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 249,409 | -224 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 249,633 | -182 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 249,815 | -172 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 249,987 | -124 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 250,111 | -148 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 250,259 | -129 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 250,388 | -180 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 250,568 | -316 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 250,884 | -271 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 251,155 | -139 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 251,294 | first reading |
Engagement
852 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.276%
- avg views ÷ 246,441 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 681
- 586 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.282%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 586
- of 852 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 385 of 586 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 852 (6 August 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 399,208 |
| Reactions total | 804 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Sept 2026, 18:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,500
- Videos
- ≈186
- Links
- ≈9,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
974 reactions across 450 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 229 | 23.5% | |
| 👍 | 131 | 13.4% | |
| 🌚 | 92 | 9.45% | |
| 🍌 | 89 | 9.14% | |
| 🥴 | 69 | 7.08% | |
| 😁 | 65 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 63 | 6.47% | |
| 👏 | 45 | 4.62% | |
| 🤣 | 33 | 3.39% | |
| 🥱 | 24 | 2.46% | |
| 👌 | 18 | 1.85% | |
| 🎉 | 14 | 1.44% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 1.44% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 0.924% | |
| 😈 | 8 | 0.821% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 0.719% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 0.719% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.513% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.411% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 0.411% | |
| 19 further kinds | 44 | 4.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 481 of the 852 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 974 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 852 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
LATEST: 📊 Public companies have added just 5.9K BTC over the past three months, compared to 89K BTC in July 2025 alone, per Glassnode.
❤2
LATEST: 📊 Grayscale's Zach Pandl says the Fed's latest 25bps hike is a "mid-cycle adjustment" rather than a policy shift, unlikely to trigger major crypto market changes.
❤2
LATEST: 🇺🇸 The CFTC has sent a proposal to regulate crypto transactions and markets to the White House for review, days after the CLARITY Act failed its Senate cloture vote.
🍌3
LATEST: ⚡️ Hyperliquid launched manual borrows, letting users borrow USDC or USDT against HYPE and BTC collateral.
🍌1
JUST IN: 📈 Bitcoin retakes $80,000.
👏3🥱1
LATEST: 💰 Stablecoin payments firm dtcpay has closed a $25M Series A, with Japan's SBI Group joining as a strategic investor.
🍌1
LATEST: 🚨 Revolut says no hacker has directly contacted it, days after a group claimed on its site it stole customer data and demanded a $3M ransom.
😁1
LATEST: 🇺🇸 Senator Marsha Blackburn told Fox Business she believes Democrats voted down the CLARITY Act because "they do not want to give Republicans and the president a win."
👎1👏1🥴1
LATEST: 📊 Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan called the CLARITY Act's failure a "speed bump, not a roadblock," arguing pro-crypto SEC and CFTC rulemaking will likely be "more pro-crypto than the Clarity Act itself."
🍌2
LATEST: 🇺🇸 Kevin O’Leary says the CLARITY Act will return in Q1 or Q2 after the midterms, arguing Congress will need regulatory policy as it moves to tax crypto.
🌭3👎1👻1
LATEST: 🇬🇧 King Charles convened execs from OpenAI, Nvidia, Anthropic and Google DeepMind in Scotland to warn of the "existential dangers" of AI falling into the wrong hands and call for international oversight.
Showing the 12 most recent of 852 posts we hold for @CoinMarketCapAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Crypto_Crabz · 2322 postsCrypto info & New Coinmarketcap and CoinGecko Coin Alert🌍
@Cryptoinfo_alert · 181 postDADEK HUBLOT
@DADEKHUB · 2061 postKingtoshi Nakamoto - Calls
@KingPepeCalls · 2011 postTRADING SPOT SIGNAL
@SpotTradingS111 · 81 postWhipLash347 | SDF Kingdom Channel
@Whiplash347_SDF · 7851 postBKK Global (BIOKKOIN)™
@bkkglobal · 631 postcrowdmachine
@crowdmachine · 281 postiExec Announcements 📢
@iexec_announcements · 6701 postAIRDROP_Perspolic
@tap_airdrop · 11 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@KhaniMarketNews · 13912 postsAggregator
@aggregator_airdrops · 32 postsخانیتکنیکال، علی خانی
@khanitechnical · 7,1472 posts🔱AIRDROP🔱
@airdropisbest · 71 postAirdropScout
@airdropscoutofficial · 101 postCRYPTO STONKS [Daily]
@crypto_stonks_daily · 5511 postБлог Кота-криптомана
@cryptocatblog · 81 postCryptography
@cryptography_airdrop · 2541 postCrypto whale channels
@duniacryptonews · 231 postCrypto business 😎
@LaNTiXCrypto · 101 postB A B Y L O N
@NewsBabylon · 121 postPhf technology
@phftecnology2012 · 31 post🧑💻Online daromad🧑💻
@tekinsaytlardandaromad · 81 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@binance_announcements · 3,456,487#1
@cointelegraph · 335,139#2
@WatcherGuru · 627,642#3
@catizenann · 3,595,575#4
@trust_announcements · 742,696#5
@whale_alert_io · 300,889#6
@theyescoin · 5,723,647#7
@coinmarketcap_listings · 13,466#8
@catapult_extreme · 8,500,526#9
@gameechannel · 1,901,951#10
@wiseadvicebysumit · 170,339#11
@next10xgem1 · 330,666#12
@fx_holding_community · 6,083,788#13
@cryptoranknews · 678,604#14
@thebull_crypto · 175,300#15
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,519,917#16
@cryptoamanclub · 104,538#17
@whalebotalerts · 144,669#18
@CoinBureau · 116,858#19
@news_crypto · 99,937#20
@money · 2,985,270#21
@therealyescoin · 2,089,882#22
@thecryptoexpress · 258,705#23
@hexnio · 1,998,607#24
@unfolded · 117,722#25
@CoinDCX_Announcements · 182,592#26
@bitcoinexpertindia · 38,697#27
@cryptoquant_alert · 71,021#28
@cryptoquant_official · 55,749#29
@CoinDeskGlobal · 14,654#30
@bitcoin · 185,243#31
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#32
@EarnWithSapna · 48,902#33
@Whalesguide · 200,022#34
@cryptodiffer · 23,613#35
@smpl_app · 1,625,754#36
@dogs · 7,065,215#37
@blumcrypto · 14,436,504#38
@notcoin · 8,651,359#39
@hamster_kombat · 20,982,519#40
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,531,077#41
@gram · 6,689,636#42
@Cats_housewtf · 7,949,411#43
@hotonnear · 4,690,614#44
@tomarket_ai · 6,657,802#45
@seedupdates · 8,226,508#46
@trendingapps · 3,812,897#47
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,968,612#48
@builders · 3,440,703#49
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 327,609#50
@bybit_announcements · 415,789#51
@realgoats_channel · 4,697,110#52
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,296,110#53
@banana_update · 1,401,181#54
@watbird · 1,476,557#55
@keeper_en · 4,759,675#56
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,588#57
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 316,220#58
@wazirx · 99,592#59
@tapswapai · 10,368,717#60
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,136,037#61
@token_1win · 2,980,801#62
@nomis_protocol · 1,549,523#63
@icodrops · 42,846#64
@OfficiaLCryptoindia · 58,446#65
@coingeckonews · 10,067#66
@bnbchain · 74,687#67
@dotcoincommunity · 3,977,366#68
@BinanceLiquidations · 180,620#69
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,507,611#70
@open4profit · 80,058#71
@airdrop6officialchannel · 1,336,225#72
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#73
@babydogecoin · 1,019,704#74
@cmcal_bot · 30,553#75
@Bitget_Announcements · 1,525,577#76
@iamalexfalcon · 3,103,154#77
@tabi_ann · 1,922,481#78
@BCUSAReal · 148,789#79
@onus_globalchannel · 1,650,302#80
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#81
@ico_analytic · 57,121#82
@GateOfficialNews · 498,465#83
@AmioCommunity · 1,747,054#84
@airdropinspector · 709,357#85
@cryptogg · 102,201#86
@TCGFORYOU · 75,033#87
@wublockchainenglish · 236,023#88
@cryptorank_fundraising · 116,649#89
@PancakeSwapAnn · 28,564#90
@airdrops_io · 71,316#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@officialcryptodaily · 36,684
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
@analyticsinsightmag · 34,642
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@biswap_news · 24,563
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
@wavesnews · 1,057,454
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@CoinBureau · 116,858
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@w3w_exchange · 29,603
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@PancakeSwapAnn · 28,564
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
@cointelegraph · 335,139
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@cmcal_bot · 30,553
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
@AjoobzNews · 46,831
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
@sscpreviousyeargkqu · 31,959
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 5 September 2026
@solanium_io · 83,556
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@trust_announcements · 742,696
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
@CardanoAnnouncements · 35,920
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@SafePal_official · 43,124
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@Ultima_Official_English · 66,674
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
@bloombergcrypto · 27,431
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
@indmoneyofficial · 28,169
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
@xdaoapp · 2,194,206
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
@freecoins24 · 34,170
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@bitcoin · 185,243
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoWorldNews · 42,487
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
@cryptodiffer · 23,613
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
@www_Bitcoin_com · 54,852
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CoinMarketCap Announcements” (@CoinMarketCapAnnouncements), 246,441 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CoinMarketCapAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.