Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold

Channel

Elite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold

@Signals2day

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,150subscribers

-6,715 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001813598413
TypeChannel
Username@Signals2day
DescriptionAdmin: @Artikaio
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Signals2day

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

30,15036,86533,507.56 August 2026 — 36,865 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,865 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,799 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,262 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,953 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,454 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,189 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,012 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,438 subscribers15 August 2026 — 33,891 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,465 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,158 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,657 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,282 subscribers22 August 2026 — 31,075 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,413 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,150 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 18 days, net -6,715. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,143–37,872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 05:3530,150-263
24 Aug 2026, 04:3430,413-662
22 Aug 2026, 11:5831,075-1,207
20 Aug 2026, 23:0132,282-375
19 Aug 2026, 00:2232,657-501
18 Aug 2026, 00:4233,158-307
16 Aug 2026, 22:1333,465-426
15 Aug 2026, 18:0833,891-547
14 Aug 2026, 08:2534,438-574
12 Aug 2026, 22:3335,012-177
12 Aug 2026, 01:5235,189-265
11 Aug 2026, 01:5135,454-499
9 Aug 2026, 22:2135,953-309
8 Aug 2026, 21:4736,262-537
7 Aug 2026, 18:3636,799-66
6 Aug 2026, 23:1536,865no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:0336,865first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 30,150 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,500
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.296%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held38 (20 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total101,474
Reactions total300
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
273
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

443 reactions across 38 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19143.1%
👍8118.3%
🔥7416.7%
🐳5512.4%
👏143.16%
🥰71.58%
😁61.35%
❤‍🔥30.677%
💯30.677%
👌20.451%
😱20.451%
🍾10.226%
💩10.226%
🕊10.226%
😍10.226%
🙏10.226%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 443reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC49 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Price has formed a bullish wedge If the wedge breaks, we can look to short the pullback to the breakout point Only in this scenario would we consider trading against the trend #MONUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

1👍1🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC331 views8 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

After breaking the BMS and confirming it, the price rallied by 50%.✅ #DASHUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

4🐳3🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC317 views8 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Full Target 44%✅ #MONUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

4🐳2👌1👍1

20 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈3,890 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Price has reached the first target. We are now waiting for the second target. So far, the spot position is up 20%.✅ #MONUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

3👍2🔥2🐳1😍1

20 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC≈6,720 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Finally, after a long time, we are witnessing Bitcoin's growth and its arrival at the zones we had marked. #BTCUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

🐳42👍2😁1

20 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈3,660 views11 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Full Target 🎯 #EURUSD #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

6🐳2👍2🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC≈5,340 views11 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Target 🎯 #EURUSD #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

6🐳2👍2💯1

19 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC≈5,630 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026

SHORT POSITION CAD/JPY ENT : 114.605 TP : 113.675 SL : 114.913 RISK : 1% #CADJPY #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

🔥42👍2🐳1

19 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈5,700 views8 reactionsread 25 August 2026

LONG POSITION EURUSD ENT : 1.15977 TP 1: 1.16109 TP 2 : 1.16195 SL : 1.15931 RISK : 1% #EURUSD #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

3🐳2👍2🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈6,120 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

After price swept the liquidity inside the FVG and moved higher, it created an Order Block. A pullback to this Order Block with confirmations on lower timeframes could offer long entries. #MONUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

👍42🔥2🐳1

18 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC≈3,890 views11 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

RESULT :✅ #SOLUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

7🐳2👍1🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈5,570 views11 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

If price breaks and closes above the descending channel, we can expect a move toward the OTE levels. Otherwise, price is likely to continue lower toward the bottom of the channel. At the moment, price is not in a suitable area for decision-making. We should wait for proper confirmations before taking any position. #MUSDT #Crypto #SIGNAL #SignalsToday @Signals2day

6👍2🔥2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @Signals2day. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 38,981 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Gem 💎
@cryptogem · 105,570
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
Krypto | Finanzen | Politik
@kryptodeutsch · 62,575
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
Bitcoin Industry
@bitcoin_industry · 416,962
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold” (@Signals2day), 30,150 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Signals2day.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.