Top Crypto Trading & Research Channels to Follow in 2026 @BlackBlockMarkets Market structure, liquidity analysis and institutional crypto insights. @Nakamoto_Signals High-probability crypto trading signals and market setups. @ChartsSignalsTrading Technical analysis, chart breakdowns and trade opportunities. @OnlyFinance_Pro Global macro, financial markets and institutional capital flows. @Bitunix_Trades Crypto …

Channel
@We_Pump_Together
@We_Pump_Together
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6,886subscribers
-11,539 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003804497673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @We_Pump_Together |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 15 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/We_Pump_Together |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 6,886 | -457 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 7,343 | -582 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 7,925 | -506 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 8,431 | -386 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:29 | 8,817 | -800 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 9,617 | -2,900 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 12,517 | -2,659 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 15,176 | -733 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:39 | 15,909 | -85 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 15,994 | -77 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 16,071 | -88 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 16,159 | -98 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 16,257 | -60 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 16,317 | -105 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 16,422 | -66 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 16,488 | -133 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 16,621 | -358 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 16,979 | -235 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 17,214 | -179 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 17,393 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 54s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
BITCOIN IS REPEATING HISTORY RIGHT NOW Same asset. Same mistake. Different cycle. They said $230 was too expensive. Then $3,500 was too expensive. Then $16,000 was too expensive. Now they say $BTC at $65,000 feels too expensive...
Top Crypto Trading & Research Channels to Follow in 2026 @BlackBlockMarkets Market structure, liquidity analysis and institutional crypto insights. @Nakamoto_Signals High-probability crypto trading signals and market setups. @ChartsSignalsTrading Technical analysis, chart breakdowns and trade opportunities. @OnlyFinance_Pro Global macro, financial markets and institutional capital flows. @Bitunix_Trades Crypto …
$BTC didn’t trade below prior cycle highs for long during the last bear market
$BTC $19K → $69K → $126K → $200K HIGHER HIGHS EVERY CYCLE THE TREND IS CLEAR 🚀
TOM LEE BITMINE CONTINUES BUYING #ETH
@We_Pump_Together pinned «🚀 We Pump Together 💎 Finding Gems Before The Crowd 📈 Memecoins • Altcoins • Trends 🔥 Early Calls & Market Insights 🌍 Community Driven 🌙 Together We Pump @NathanColeCrypto https://t.me/We_Pump_Together»
🚀 We Pump Together 💎 Finding Gems Before The Crowd 📈 Memecoins • Altcoins • Trends 🔥 Early Calls & Market Insights 🌍 Community Driven 🌙 Together We Pump @NathanColeCrypto https://t.me/We_Pump_Together
❤1
🚨 BREAKING 🇺🇸🇮🇷 U.S. AND IRAN HAVE AGREED TO STOP ALL ATTACKS AND MEET THIS WEEK: AXIOS. ODDS OF A US-IRAN PEACE DEAL ON PREDICTION MARKETS JUST PUMPED TO 50%. THIS IS EXTREMELY BULLISH FOR MARKETS...
I OPENED THIS $BTC SHORT AT $67,000 Risking $4,000 to make $14,600 The setup is simple Bitcoin lost support, retested it as resistance And now I'm targeting $52,000 See you at the target
Believe me or not. ETH will go parabolic. I say within the next 6 weeks. And when it does, That’s a green light for our altcoins. ETH strength = liquidity rotation into alts. Hold strong. The next leg up is just around the corner.
🚨BITCOIN IS DEAD AGAIN Сrowd was euphoric at $120,000 Now they're bearish at $60,000 This is why most people never make money
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @We_Pump_Together. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@BitcoinInsightsDaily · 66,5532 postsBitunix Trading Signals
@Bitunix_Trades · 70,9192 postsBlack Block Markets
@BlackBlockMarkets · 74,4562 postsCharts Signals Trading
@ChartsSignalsTrading · 110,4062 postsCrypto News Bitcoin Ethereum Tron Solana Pump.Fun
@Crypto_News_Bitcoin_Ethereum · 12,9642 postsCrypto Invest next 100x
@CryptoInvest100X · 31,7552 postsCrypto Pro Updates
@CryptoProUpdates · 25,5462 postsCrypto Trading
@CryptoVTrading · 28,6682 postsEthereum Merge
@Ethereum_Merge · 14,2002 postsGAMEFI Launches
@GameFiLaunches · 10,2262 postsGreen Candle Society
@Green_Candle_Society · 14,3202 postsNakamoto Signals
@Nakamoto_Signals · 75,6812 postsOnly Finance
@OnlyFinance_Pro · 87,9982 postsElite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold
@Signals2day · 16,9312 postsUpOnly Marketing Agency
@UpOnlyMarketing · 6,0202 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@We_Pump_Together named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 12 posts, 8 August 2026 – 28 August 2026 · confirmed gone 21 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@We_Pump_Together” (@We_Pump_Together), 6,886 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/We_Pump_Together.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.