JUST IN: Michael Saylor sees 3 huge drivers for Bitcoin's next leg up: • Favorable regulatory environment • Accelerated banking adoption • Expanding digital asset industry This man definitely puts his money where his mouth is. @BlackBlockMarkets

Channel
Black Block Markets
@BlackBlockMarkets
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
74,270subscribers
+5,971 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001051601532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlackBlockMarkets |
| Description | BlackBlock Markets exists to observe how capital moves before it becomes obvious Manager: @BlackBlockMarketsAdmin |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlackBlockMarkets |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 74,270 | -1,429 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 75,699 | -2,172 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 15:41 | 77,871 | -1,707 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 12:42 | 79,578 | +3,260 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 76,318 | +1,862 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 74,456 | +1,931 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 72,525 | +1,832 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 70,693 | +3,368 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 67,325 | +7,817 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 59,508 | +7,839 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 51,669 | -2,280 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 53,949 | -1,632 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:53 | 55,581 | -1,045 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:24 | 56,626 | -482 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 57,108 | -808 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 57,916 | -1,710 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 59,626 | -970 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 60,596 | -309 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 60,905 | -343 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 61,248 | first reading |
Engagement
156 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 139 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.09%
- avg views ÷ 74,270 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,040
- 84 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 84
- of 156 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 156 (18 July 2026 – 13 October 2026) |
| Views total | 255,015 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Oct 2026, 04:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 149
- Videos
- 111
- Links
- 15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 21m 31s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🚨 BITCOIN IS SETTING UP FOR A MASSIVE SHORT SQUEEZE Just look at the latest BTC liquidation heatmap. HUGE LIQUIDITY CLUSTERS ARE STACKING UP ABOVE THE CURRENT PRICE: → $84,000-$85,000: First major liquidation zone. → $87,000+: The biggest liquidity magnet on the entire chart. After the recent crash, short positions are now exposed to a potentially violent upside squeeze. A BREAK ABOVE $84K WILL PUT THE $87K LIQUIDITY…
My crypto targets for this cycle: $ BTC : $160K–$200K $ ETH : $8K–$10K $ SOL : $400–$600 $ BNB : $1,200–$1,600 $ HYPE : $85–$130 $ PUMP : $0.01–$0.02 $ XRP : $4.50–$6.50 $ LTC : $300–$350 $ LINK : $200–$350 $ ZEC : $1,800–$2,500 $ NEAR : $12–$18 Bookmark it :) @BlackBlockMarkets
🚨 BREAKING 🇺🇸 THE FED IS REPORTEDLY PREPARING A MULTI-BILLION-DOLLAR LIQUIDITY INJECTION PLAN FOR THE COMING MONTHS! THE FED IS ALREADY PREPARING FOR MORE RATE HIKES BEFORE THE END OF 2026. THE LOGIC IS SIMPLE: HIGHER RATES → TIGHTER FINANCIAL CONDITIONS → GREATER PRESSURE ON BANKS, STOCKS, AND CRYPTO. ADDITIONAL LIQUIDITY OPERATIONS WOULD HELP THE FED KEEP FUNDING MARKETS STABLE WHILE IT CONTINUES FIGHTING INFLATION…
BITCOIN IS ABOUT TO EXPLODE. THE LAST LIQUIDITY SWEEP SENT $ BTC FROM $75K TO $87K. NOW ANOTHER SWEEP IS SETTING UP THE NEXT MASSIVE RALLY. WE WILL SMASH THROUGH $100K FAST AND ATTACK NEW ALL-TIME HIGHS. $126K → $150K → $200K. @BlackBlockMarkets
THE BOTTOM IS ALREADY IN IF YOU’RE LOSING YOUR NERVE, ZOOM OUT THIS IS JUST A FALSE BREAKDOWN DON’T LET THE MARKET SHAKE YOU OUT @BlackBlockMarkets
🚨 BITCOIN HAS BEEN HIDING THE ANSWER IN PLAIN SIGHT FOR YEARS. 500 DAYS BEFORE THE HALVING → BUILD YOUR POSITION. HALVING → SIT TIGHT. 500 DAYS AFTER → TAKE MONEY OFF THE TABLE. THAT’S IT. NO 47 INDICATORS. NO PANICKING OVER EVERY RED CANDLE. NO LIVING FROM FED MEETING TO FED MEETING. THE BIG MONEY IS MADE BY UNDERSTANDING TIME, NOT BY TRADING EVERY MOVE. $ BTC WILL REWARD PATIENCE AGAIN. SAVE THIS. THE CYCLE DOESN’T…
The four-year cycle playbook many relied on has not worked for this $BTC bear. At this point, the last three were more than twice as deep and weeks from their lows. This one is 30% below its high and rising. A late drop to their depth looks less likely by the week. @BlackBlockMarkets
THE BITCOIN LOSS/PROFIT RATIO IS HITTING EXTREME LEVELS. UTXOs in loss becoming increasingly significant. These readings only appear during periods of strong market stress. Bear market territory on this specific metric. But here is the important context. This indicator strips out price distortion entirely. It simply counts UTXOs in profit versus loss. A constant specific to Bitcoin behavior. And at these extreme loss…
JUST IN: VanEck CEO says approval for a single nuclear power plant will unlock massive value for AI. Cheaper energy for miners = less Bitcoin sell pressure. Sounds bullish! 🚀 @BlackBlockMarkets
Bitcoin’s 4-Year Cycle Is Still Playing Out: Cycle 1 (2011–2014) 2011 — Accumulate 2012 — Hold 2013 — Take Profit 2014 — Bear Market Cycle 2 (2015–2018) 2015 — Accumulate 2016 — Hold 2017 — Take Profit 2018 — Bear Market Cycle 3 (2019–2022) 2019 — Accumulate 2020 — Hold 2021 — Take Profit 2022 — Bear Market Cycle 4 (2023–2026) 2023 — Accumulate 2024 — Hold 2025 — Take Profit 2026 — Bear Market ← WE ARE HERE Cycle 5 (…
DEFI DEPOSITS EXPLODED 5X TO $100B THEN CAME THE LIQUIDATIONS. $250 million in weekly non-stablecoin liquidations at the peak. This is the hidden cost of DeFi's growth story. Deposits mainstream. Yields attractive. Liquidation risk underestimated. Every ETH price drop triggered cascading liquidations across lending protocols. $75 billion still deployed today. The opportunity is real. The risk is equally real. DeFi do…
Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @BlackBlockMarkets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Altcoin_News_Today · 4,50916 postsGreen Candle Society
@Green_Candle_Society · 13,10015 postsGAMEFI Launches
@GameFiLaunches · 4,58613 postsCrypto Trading
@CryptoVTrading · 27,69912 posts@We_Pump_Together
@We_Pump_Together · 6,35712 postsCrypto Invest next 100x
@CryptoInvest100X · 32,5282 postsBitcoin Insights
@BitcoinInsightsDaily · 67,9041 postBitunix Trading Signals
@Bitunix_Trades · 70,7301 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BlackBlockMarkets named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 7 September 2026 – 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Black Block Markets” (@BlackBlockMarkets), 74,270 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlackBlockMarkets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.