Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bitcoin Insights

Channel

Bitcoin Insights

@BitcoinInsightsDaily

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

47,276subscribers

-4,434 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001044917397
TypeChannel
Username@BitcoinInsightsDaily
DescriptionBitcoin is a global macro asset. This channel is dedicated to Bitcoin only. Structure. Liquidity. Macro. No noise. Admin: @JaleBTC @BitcoinInsightsDaily
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BitcoinInsightsDaily

Growth

47,27655,76551,520.57 August 2026 — 51,710 subscribers7 August 2026 — 51,710 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,769 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,212 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55,520 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,987 subscribers12 August 2026 — 54,781 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55,765 subscribers15 August 2026 — 55,312 subscribers16 August 2026 — 55,187 subscribers17 August 2026 — 54,636 subscribers18 August 2026 — 53,956 subscribers19 August 2026 — 53,845 subscribers20 August 2026 — 53,428 subscribers21 August 2026 — 52,790 subscribers23 August 2026 — 51,346 subscribers24 August 2026 — 50,644 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,068 subscribers26 August 2026 — 49,962 subscribers27 August 2026 — 49,779 subscribers28 August 2026 — 49,165 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,610 subscribers30 August 2026 — 47,925 subscribers31 August 2026 — 47,516 subscribers1 September 2026 — 47,276 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 25 days, net -4,434. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,003–57,038 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 12:4447,276-240
31 Aug 2026, 15:4347,516-409
30 Aug 2026, 15:1647,925-685
29 Aug 2026, 15:5448,610-555
28 Aug 2026, 17:1549,165-614
27 Aug 2026, 20:4549,779-183
26 Aug 2026, 20:2349,962-106
25 Aug 2026, 22:3350,068-576
24 Aug 2026, 19:1650,644-702
23 Aug 2026, 03:1551,346-1,444
21 Aug 2026, 18:4752,790-638
20 Aug 2026, 18:0953,428-417
19 Aug 2026, 21:3953,845-111
18 Aug 2026, 21:5653,956-680
17 Aug 2026, 20:3754,636-551
16 Aug 2026, 19:4355,187-125
15 Aug 2026, 05:2455,312-453
14 Aug 2026, 00:1855,765+984
12 Aug 2026, 16:0454,781-206
11 Aug 2026, 16:1154,987first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 47,276 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,380
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
21
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held38 (18 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total113,040
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
67
Videos
98
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 45s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

FUN FACT: Michael Saylor spoke at Goldman Sachs on July 2 when Bitcoin was $61,400. It’s up 28% since.🚀 @BitcoinInsightsDaily

31 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Ex-Credit Suisse valuation director sees $150k Bitcoin by 2027 — Investingˑcom • USD debasement hedge in BTC or gold. • Healthier market structure backed by ETF inflows. @BitcoinInsightsDaily

31 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

The real Bitcoin bull run hasn't even begun. 👀 Hang tight and HODL! @BitcoinInsightsDaily

31 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 1 September 2026

STRATEGY BOUGHT 4,603 BTC ($369.7M) AT AN AVERAGE PRICE OF $80,318 @BitcoinInsightsDaily

28 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈6,960 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚨Nearly $2 TRILLION wiped out from stocks, metals and crypto in just 2.5 hours. Here's why: 1. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh called inflation "concerning" at Jackson Hole. 2. September rate hike odds jumped from 34% to 61.7% within hours. 3. US 2Y bond yield hit a 1 month high. @BitcoinInsightsDaily

26 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈8,200 viewsread 1 September 2026
Video

BITCOIN IS HEADING STRAIGHT FOR $300,000 THIS CYCLE 🚀🔥 @BitcoinInsightsDaily

25 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC≈5,090 viewsread 1 September 2026

🚨 STOP SCROLLING. Most traders will miss the next big move. The ones who don’t? They’re already inside the right communities. Join the fastest-growing crypto channels: 🔥 https://t.me/ChartsSignalsTrading ⚡ https://t.me/Signals2day 💎 https://t.me/CryptoInvest100X 📰 https://t.me/CryptoProUpdates 🚀 https://t.me/OnlyFinance_Pro The next breakout won’t wait. Be early, not late. ⏳

25 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈12,600 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Bitcoin's market cap increased by $416 BILLION in just 9 weeks. The TOTAL market cap 3 years ago was just $300B. @BitcoinInsightsDaily

23 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈4,900 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Gold Call-Option Demand Reaches Six-Month Peak Demand for gold call options has climbed to a six-month high as market participants position for potential price increases while gold trades at elevated levels. @BitcoinInsightsDaily

22 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC≈6,250 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Bitcoin Whale Dumps $576M in BTC A mysterious whale sold 7,770 BTC worth $576.6M over three days, while depositing more than 12,513 BTC into Binance since July 19. BTC slipped around 1% to $77,321, with analysts watching for a possible $69K-$70K pullback before a push toward $80K.

22 Aug 2026, 00:57 UTC≈5,450 viewsread 1 September 2026
Video

Bitcoin is repeating 2016 pattern PERFECTLY. The structure is almost identical. 2016: ATH → Correction → Recovery → Final Flush → New Bull Run 2026: ATH → Correction → Recovery → Final Flush → ? The 2016 cycle looked ugly before the real move began. $BTC followed the same structure before breaking into a new ATH in 2017. $126K → $82K → $65K → $50K → New ATH Next stops: → $50K before the reversal → Accumulation

21 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈3,490 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Whopping $4.5b of shorts liquidations in three days! @BitcoinInsightsDaily

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @BitcoinInsightsDaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 773,021 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bitcoin Insights” (@BitcoinInsightsDaily), 47,276 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitcoinInsightsDaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.