https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090187336806273442
β3
Signed DaanCrypto

Channel
@DaanCryptoTG
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
6,831subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001903319347 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DaanCryptoTG |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 30 November 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DaanCryptoTG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 6,831 | -20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 6,851 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 6,857 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 6,864 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 6,875 | +59 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 6,816 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 6,820 | -11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 6,831 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 6,842 | -19 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 6,861 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 6,861 | first reading |
81 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 52 of 53 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 81 (1 August 2026 β 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,445 |
| Reactions total | 169 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
257 reactions across 79 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 190 | 73.9% | |
| β | 44 | 17.1% | |
| β€ | 13 | 5.06% | |
| π | 2 | 0.778% | |
| π₯ | 2 | 0.778% | |
| π€ | 2 | 0.778% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1 | 0.389% | |
| π | 1 | 0.389% | |
| π | 1 | 0.389% | |
| π― | 1 | 0.389% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090187336806273442
β3
Signed DaanCrypto
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090167165140033786
β1π1
Signed DaanCrypto
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090100402221945223
π2
Signed DaanCrypto
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090099425620218258
π3
Signed DaanCrypto
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090098798777278497
π2
Signed DaanCrypto
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090095213339463820
π2
Signed DaanCrypto
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090094505491898529
π1
Signed DaanCrypto
There's our volatility. ETH back above 2K and BTC testing the big 67K level soon
π4
Signed DaanCrypto
Interesting headlines: Mini QE increase https://x.com/zerohedge/status/2090055275403178193?s=20 Moderna Cancer Vaccin Phase 3 success. MRNA up 2x pre market from a $25B market cap valuation https://x.com/WSJ/status/2090029149985362119
π2
Signed DaanCrypto
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090031521809735867
π2
Signed DaanCrypto
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2089985878403829982
β1
Signed DaanCrypto
https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2089971123337535811
β1π1
Signed DaanCrypto
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @DaanCryptoTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βDaanCrypto Updates πβ (@DaanCryptoTG), 6,831 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DaanCryptoTG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.