Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DaanCrypto Updates πŸ””

Channel

DaanCrypto Updates πŸ””

@DaanCryptoTG

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

6,831subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001903319347
TypeChannel
Username@DaanCryptoTG
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 30 November 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DaanCryptoTG

Growth

6,8166,8756,845.56 August 2026 β€” 6,861 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 6,861 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 6,842 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 6,831 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 6,820 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 6,816 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 6,875 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 6,864 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 6,857 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 6,851 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 6,831 subscribers6,8316 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 28 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,807–6,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 09:436,831-20
30 Aug 2026, 20:246,851-6
28 Aug 2026, 06:336,857-7
25 Aug 2026, 14:346,864-11
22 Aug 2026, 22:426,875+59
19 Aug 2026, 17:126,816-4
16 Aug 2026, 18:066,820-11
13 Aug 2026, 04:256,831-11
9 Aug 2026, 20:116,842-19
6 Aug 2026, 18:406,861no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:476,861first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
5.92%
avg views Γ· 6,831 subscribers
Avg views / post
405
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.805%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 52 of 53 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held81 (1 August 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total21,445
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

257 reactions across 79 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘19073.9%
✍4417.1%
❀135.06%
πŸ‘€20.778%
πŸ”₯20.778%
🀝20.778%
❀‍πŸ”₯10.389%
πŸ†’10.389%
πŸŽ‰10.389%
πŸ’―10.389%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC216 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090187336806273442

✍3

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC228 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090167165140033786

✍1πŸŽ‰1

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC348 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090100402221945223

πŸ‘2

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC343 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090099425620218258

πŸ‘3

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC321 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090098798777278497

πŸ‘2

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC331 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090095213339463820

πŸ‘2

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC315 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090094505491898529

πŸ‘1

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC308 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

There's our volatility. ETH back above 2K and BTC testing the big 67K level soon

πŸ‘4

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC372 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Interesting headlines: Mini QE increase https://x.com/zerohedge/status/2090055275403178193?s=20 Moderna Cancer Vaccin Phase 3 success. MRNA up 2x pre market from a $25B market cap valuation https://x.com/WSJ/status/2090029149985362119

πŸ‘2

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC384 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2090031521809735867

πŸ‘2

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC397 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2089985878403829982

✍1

Signed DaanCrypto

19 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC388 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/DaanCrypto/status/2089971123337535811

✍1πŸ†’1

Signed DaanCrypto

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @DaanCryptoTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

EmperorBTC Channel
@EmperorbtcTA Β· 91,498
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here β€” alongside 88 others β€” read 17 August 2026
macnbtc's winner circle πŸΊπŸ“ˆ
@teammacnbtc Β· 33,308
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here β€” alongside 86 others β€” read 4 September 2026
Ash Crypto
@AshCryptoTG Β· 60,097
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 87 here β€” alongside 86 others β€” read 22 August 2026
100eyes Crypto Scanner (PREVIEW)
@CryptoScanner100eyes Β· 31,599
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here β€” alongside 81 others β€” read 6 September 2026
Dr.Profit πŸš€
@Therealdrprofit Β· 54,243
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here β€” alongside 90 others β€” read 24 August 2026
Glassnode
@glassnode Β· 44,342
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here β€” alongside 91 others β€” read 28 August 2026
CryptoQuant
@cryptoquant_official Β· 55,927
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here β€” alongside 93 others β€” read 23 August 2026
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG Β· 116,486
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 92 here β€” alongside 91 others β€” read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œDaanCrypto Updates πŸ””β€ (@DaanCryptoTG), 6,831 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DaanCryptoTG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.