Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wall Street Queen OFFICIAL ®️

Channel

Wall Street Queen OFFICIAL ®️

@wallstreetqueenofficialTG

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

154,781subscribers

-76,040 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002160438542
TypeChannel
Username@wallstreetqueenofficialTG
DescriptionI’m not only a pretty face… I’ll show step by step how to beat this market, because I already did. Contact - t.me/wallstreetqueenadminOfficial Bybit - https://partner.bybit.com/b/wsqueen Welcome to the family❤️ #DYOR
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/wallstreetqueenofficialTG

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@tradercamps/150625 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC@wallstreetqueenofficialTG/2145 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC1.002.9 hours
@tradercamps/150726 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC@wallstreetqueenofficialTG/2146 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 23:37 UTC1.002.8 hours
@tradercamps/150929 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC@wallstreetqueenofficialTG/2150 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 21:51 UTC1.0012 minutes
@tradercamps/151031 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC@wallstreetqueenofficialTG/2152 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC1.0031 minutes
@tradercamps/15121 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC@wallstreetqueenofficialTG/2155 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC1.0065 minutes
@tradercamps/15132 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC@wallstreetqueenofficialTG/2156 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC1.009.5 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tradercamps10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0048 minutes@tradercamps (10–0)
@SmartMoneyTime9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0039 minutes@SmartMoneyTime (9–0)
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0048 minutes@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP (7–0)
@Market_Owners_Team7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0022 minutes@Market_Owners_Team (7–0)
@wallstreetqueenofficial7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0050 minutes@wallstreetqueenofficial (7–0)
@CoreDigest7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0048 minutes@CoreDigest (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 46 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @SmartMoneyTime. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

154,781230,821192,8017 August 20266 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -76,040. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 143,375–242,227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 16:21154,781-1,134
5 Nov 2026, 16:00155,915-1,446
4 Nov 2026, 17:05157,361-1,989
3 Nov 2026, 15:06159,350-158
2 Nov 2026, 14:08159,508-1,430
1 Nov 2026, 16:46160,938-1,281
31 Oct 2026, 19:27162,219-3,603
30 Oct 2026, 16:04165,822-2,153
29 Oct 2026, 15:56167,975-4,474
28 Oct 2026, 16:06172,449-2,383
27 Oct 2026, 19:28174,832-1,648
26 Oct 2026, 18:48176,480-3,040
25 Oct 2026, 19:08179,520-1,147
24 Oct 2026, 21:55180,667-2,771
23 Oct 2026, 21:35183,438-2,764
22 Oct 2026, 21:56186,202-3,823
21 Oct 2026, 21:16190,025-5,792
20 Oct 2026, 18:47195,817-2,923
19 Oct 2026, 18:50198,740-757
18 Oct 2026, 21:28199,497first reading

Engagement

186 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.16%
avg views ÷ 154,781 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,200
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
29
of 186 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held186 (23 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total411,310
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,160
Videos
≈10
Links
≈558

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (3.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 20:11 UTC≈9,610 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#ETH/USDT UPDATE: It is now breaking out of a resistance zone and a resistance trendline, which is a bullish sign. The possible scenario is that if the daily candle closes above the zone, we can expect a pump toward the upper resistance zone, which contains the next targets. Keep an eye on it and stay tuned for further updates.

21 Oct 2026, 19:57 UTC≈13,500 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

COIN: #BNB/USDT 1st target reached🔥 Target 1: $745✅ 30% profit with 10x🤑 Our VIP members always know what to do and what not to do😎 Message me now t.me/wallstreetqueenadminOfficial Cheers to all VIP members. VIP ONLY (WALLSTREET QUEEN OFFICIAL)

21 Oct 2026, 19:56 UTC≈12,400 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Coin: #BNB/USDT Direction: Long Leverage: 20x Entry: 728$ - 720$ Targets: 745 - 760 - 780$ Stoploss: 712$

19 Oct 2026, 21:04 UTC≈10,800 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#ENJ/USDT UPDATE: It dumped exactly as expected after our update, and our first target was 5%, which is remain by 1%. Those who opened a short position booked good profits which is 4%. Enjoy the profits and hold the position for more with a small quantity. Stay tuned with us for further updates.

19 Oct 2026, 19:44 UTC≈11,800 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#BNB/USDT: It is currently trading around $728 and has already broken out of the falling wedge pattern, which is a bullish sign. Therefore, according to the pattern, we can expect a 3-5% pump from here; however, if it breaks below $716 and closes there, the setup will be invalid. Keep an eye on it and stay tuned for further updates.

19 Oct 2026, 19:43 UTC≈11,000 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#C98/USDT UPDATE: It dumped exactly as expected after our update, and our first target was 5%, which is almost reached. Those who opened a short position booked good profits. Enjoy the profits and hold the position for more with a small quantity. Stay tuned with us for further updates.

18 Oct 2026, 15:02 UTC≈10,500 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#ENJ/USDT BREAKDOWN UPDATE It has already broken down from the Descending Triangle, which is a bearish sign. We can expect a dump, and the target will be 5-7%. The setup will be invalid once it breaks above $0.02900. Keep an eye on it and stay tuned for further updates.

18 Oct 2026, 14:35 UTC≈11,900 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#LINK/USDT UPDATE It also breaks down the inverse cup and handle pattern and is looking bearish, so from here we can expect a short position with a target of 5-10%, and once it breaks above the $12,500 zone, the setup will be invalid; therefore, those who are interested can open a short position, and stay tuned with us for further updates.

18 Oct 2026, 14:31 UTC≈12,400 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#C98/USDT UPDATE It has already broken down from the inverse cup and handle pattern on the 4hr time frame, which is a bearish sign. According to the pattern, we can expect a 5-10% dump from here, which will be the target. Once it breaks above $0.016, the setup will be invalid. Stay tuned with us for further updates.

17 Oct 2026, 23:55 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

COIN: 💵 #LINK/USDT All Targets reached🔥 Target 1: $13.050✅ Target 2: $12.750✅ Target 3: $12.500✅ Target 4: $12.200✅ Target 5: $11.800✅ 120% profit with 10x🤑 Our VIP members always know what to do and what not to do😎 Message me now t.me/wallstreetqueenadminOfficial Cheers to all VIP members🍾🍾 VIP ONLY (WALLSTREET QUEEN OFFICIAL)

17 Oct 2026, 20:55 UTC≈14,100 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#ETH/USDT UPDATE: It is currently trading around $2420 and forming a bullish bat pattern; therefore, the price may rise to complete the pattern, leading to a pump toward the upper point. Keep an eye on it and stay tuned for further updates.

17 Oct 2026, 19:52 UTC≈14,000 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🚨LIMITED TIME VIP OFFER!!🚨 The market is about to see its next leg up, and our VIPs are ready to catch the most profitable moves of the year. Join our VIP family for the lowest prices we’ve ever had (and that we’re likely not having again). First come, first served!!🔥 Wallstreet Queen® VIP 1 Month - $150 (Was $500) 3 Months - $350 (Was $1300) 🔥LIFETIME - $450 (Was $2500)🔥 What you’ll get in our VIP? 30-40 signals …

Showing the 12 most recent of 186 posts we hold for @wallstreetqueenofficialTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 234,837
#1
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 149,237
#2
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreet_queen_signals · 795
#3
Bitcoin Bullets® VIP
@BitcoinBullets_VipOfficial · 20,400
#4
Fed. Russian Insiders VIP®
@FedRussianInsiders_Vip · 17,477
#5
Wallstreet Queen Official ViP
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP · 24,243
#6
Fed. Russian Insiders®
@federal_russian_insiders · 814
#7
CryptoX™ (Analyst)
@cryptoxanalyst · 727
#8
Wall Street Queen Official®️
@wallstreet_queenofficial · 87,809
#9
Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals0rg · 44,347
#10
Wall Street Queen Official
@wallstreetqueenofficial1 · 2,758
#11
Fed. Russian Insiders®
@FedRussianInsiders · 113,744
#12
Fed. Russian Insiders®
@FedRussianlnsiders · 4,193
#13
Crypto Trading Leaks
@ThunderCatTrading · 307
#14
Bitcoin (BTC) Republic™
@btcrepublic · 1,243
#15
CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,226
#16
Bitcoin Bullets® Premium Free
@BitcoinBulletsInsidersVip · 16,152
#17
Learn 2 Trade Crypto
@learn2tradectypto · 21,774
#18
Rose Crypto Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@cryptorosechannelll · 5,791
#19
FREE Bitcoin Bullets Vip DRVKICH
@crypto_leaksss · 1,357
#20
Wolf of Trading®
@wolfoftrading · 120,287
#21
CoinCodeCap Classic
@coincodecap · 25,202
#22
Fat Pig Signals OFFICIAL
@fatpigsignalsofficialTG · 80,445
#23
Binance Killers® VIP Signals
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 45,470
#24
CALL AND PUT
@stocks_fno · 580
#25
Crypto Scalp Signals — BTC & ETH Technical Analysis
@crypto_scalp_signals · 29,118
#26
Crypto Inner Circle®
@crypto_inner_circle_signals · 770
#27
Bitcoin Bullets®
@BitcoinBullets · 96,746
#28
Bitcoin Bullets®
@bitcoin_bullets_signals · 774
#29
Crypto Pump Club 📈
@CryptopumpcIub · 21,393
#30
Shining Gold Bullion
@shininggoldth · 578
#31
Crypsho Scalp
@crypsho_scalp · 45
#32
CryptoNinjas Trading 🥷🏿
@cryptoninjas_trading_ann · 20,308
#33
Finvesteducation
@sdf4343d1 · 448
#34
Crypto News
@CryptoNewsBroadcast · 2,491
#35
Binance 360 Free BY Godleak
@binance360_free · 1,933
#36
Crypto Pump Club 📈
@crypto_pumps_p · 189,463
#37
LAMBO BET TIPS
@graceytips · 2,602
#38
AltSignals VIP
@AltSignal_VIP · 7,738
#39
Coin Monkeys™
@coinmonkeys · 919
#40
Crypto Insider 📈
@Crypto_Insiders_Club · 7,724
#41
Invezz Signals™
@InvezzSignals · 791
#42
Sublime Traders® Official - AI Trading Tools + Premium Crypto Signals
@sublimetraders · 4,537
#43
Binance 360 Spot - By Banana Bot
@Binance_360_spot · 8,361
#44
Binance Killers® VIP
@BinanceKillersVipOfficial · 23,948
#45
Inner Circle VIP FREE
@innercirclevipbyCF · 7,537
#46
Binance Pumps®
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,607
#47
Freya AI | OnwardBTC Crypto Signals
@onwardbtc_official · 1,552
#48
Mexc Pump Signal
@mexc_pumpsignal · 37,550
#49
Axper Crypto Free
@axpercryptofree · 583
#50
Binance Signals 🌐 🚀
@binance_signals2 · 66
#51
Crypto Leaks
@Crypto_leakk · 3,868
#52
Bitcoin Bullets VIP LEAK
@bitcoinbulletsvip · 10,946
#53
NimblrTA Alerts
@NimblrTA_Alerts · 2,110
#54
Signalpeak
@Signalpeak24 · 24,539
#55
BSc Blockchain Technology 2024-2025
@BScBlockchainDoT · 211
#56
Crypto Whale Pumps | Crypto Signals by @andreoutberg
@whalepumpgroup23 · 16,065
#57
Crypto AMAN®
@crypto_aman_vip_signals · 721
#58
Humans No Context
@outofcontexthumans · 1,864
#59
Financial Astrology: Gann Academy
@gannalerts · 1,077
#60
Binance Pro ( ++ Plus )
@Binance_Pro_orginal · 7,986
#61
BCCI IPL 2025
@BCCI_IPL_2025 · 759
#62
Global Chartist 😍
@GlobalChartist · 862
#63
World of Statistics
@worldofstatstg · 2,680
#64

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fat Pig Signals OFFICIAL
@fatpigsignalsofficialTG · 80,445
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
Wall Street Queen Official®️
@wallstreet_queenofficial · 87,809
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 August 2026
Bullet Line Cricket Line™
@Bullet_line_Cricket_line · 27,254
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 9 September 2026
Crypto Scalp Signals — BTC & ETH Technical Analysis
@crypto_scalp_signals · 29,118
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 7 September 2026
RAM JI KI PATHSHALA (RJKP)
@RamJiKiPathshala · 36,393
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 3 October 2026
Verified Crypto Traders ®
@VerifiedCryptoTradersgram · 20,308
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 22 September 2026
CryptoNinjas Trading 🥷🏿
@cryptoninjas_trading_ann · 20,308
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 September 2026
Crypto Pump Club 📈
@CryptopumpcIub · 21,393
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wall Street Queen OFFICIAL ®️” (@wallstreetqueenofficialTG), 154,781 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wallstreetqueenofficialTG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.