Channel
@cryptotipstrick
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,872subscribers
-3,260 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001265774573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptotipstrick |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 39 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptotipstrick |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:30 | 19,872 | -25 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 19,897 | -85 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 19,982 | -167 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 20,149 | -215 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 20,364 | -293 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 20,657 | -132 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 20,789 | -81 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 20,870 | -100 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 20,970 | -128 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 21,098 | -252 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 21,350 | -386 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 21,736 | -221 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 21,957 | -101 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 22,058 | -115 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:09 | 22,173 | -91 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 22,264 | -92 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 22,356 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 22,377 | -41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 22,418 | -34 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 22,452 | first reading |
81 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 81 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
⚡️⚡️ #ANKR/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (25х) Entry Targets: 0.004687 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.00476 2) 0.00480 3) 0.00485 4) 0.00492 5) 0.00497 6) 0.00504 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #1000SHIB/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (75х) Entry Targets: 0.005241 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.00532 2) 0.00537 3) 0.00542 4) 0.00550 5) 0.00556 6) 0.00563 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #ALICE/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (20х) Entry Targets: 0.1365 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.13855 2) 0.13991 3) 0.14128 4) 0.14333 5) 0.14469 6) 0.14674 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #AKE/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (10х) Entry Targets: 0.0087110 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.00884 2) 0.00893 3) 0.00902 4) 0.00915 5) 0.00923 6) 0.00936 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #AAVE/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (120х) Entry Targets: 126.09 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 127.98135 2) 129.24225 3) 130.50315 4) 132.39450 5) 133.65540 6) 135.54675 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #AAVE/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (120х) Entry Targets: 126.09 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 127.98135 2) 129.24225 3) 130.50315 4) 132.39450 5) 133.65540 6) 135.54675 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #AXL/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (50х) Entry Targets: 0.04659 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.04729 2) 0.04775 3) 0.04822 4) 0.04892 5) 0.04939 6) 0.05008 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #BOME/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (50х) Entry Targets: 0.0009008 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.00091 2) 0.00092 3) 0.00093 4) 0.00095 5) 0.00095 6) 0.00097 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #APEX/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (25х) Entry Targets: 0.2564 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.26025 2) 0.26281 3) 0.26537 4) 0.26922 5) 0.27178 6) 0.27563 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #BRETT/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (20х) Entry Targets: 0.005085 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.00516 2) 0.00521 3) 0.00526 4) 0.00534 5) 0.00539 6) 0.00547 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #ALPINE/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (10х) Entry Targets: 0.3520 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.35728 2) 0.36080 3) 0.36432 4) 0.36960 5) 0.37312 6) 0.37840 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
⚡️⚡️ #1INCH/USDT ⚡️⚡️ Exchanges: Bingx Signal Type: Regular (Long) Leverage: Cross (75х) Entry Targets: 0.08789 Take-Profit Targets: 1) 0.08921 2) 0.09009 3) 0.09097 4) 0.09228 5) 0.09316 6) 0.09448 7) 🚀🚀🚀 Stop Targets: 5-10
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @cryptotipstrick. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@cryptotipstrick edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Tips & Tricks” (@cryptotipstrick), 19,872 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptotipstrick.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.