Jangan lupa wd, selamat beristirahat . Happy weekend dan siapkan pertempuran kembali di hari senin

Channel
Billionaire Trader💸
@BillionaireTrader99
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,672subscribers
-2,145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001592523370 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BillionaireTrader99 |
| Description | Admin : @kontakadminbt - Tidak ada ajakan jual atau beli asset crypto tertentu - Tidak ada titip dana - Tidak berafiliasi dengan project crypto manapun |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BillionaireTrader99 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:06 | 32,672 | +11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:16 | 32,661 | +74 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:21 | 32,587 | -7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:31 | 32,594 | -19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:30 | 32,613 | +10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:46 | 32,603 | -22 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:01 | 32,625 | -30 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:31 | 32,655 | -27 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 32,682 | -22 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:31 | 32,704 | -18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 32,722 | -33 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:56 | 32,755 | -18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 32,773 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 32,782 | -18 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 32,800 | -25 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 32,825 | -30 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:36 | 32,855 | -44 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 32,899 | -21 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:55 | 32,920 | -31 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:08 | 32,951 | first reading |
Engagement
601 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 167 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.53%
- avg views ÷ 32,672 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 500
- 286 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.68%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 287
- of 601 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 162 of 286 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 601 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 142,865 |
| Reactions total | 1,382 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 07:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,700
- Videos
- ≈89
- Links
- ≈1,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 30s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,061 reactions across 378 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,986 | 48.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1,680 | 41.4% | |
| 👍 | 86 | 2.12% | |
| 😍 | 85 | 2.09% | |
| 🙏 | 75 | 1.85% | |
| ✍ | 45 | 1.11% | |
| 🫡 | 43 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 0.32% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 0.271% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.148% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 0.123% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 0.123% | |
| 😘 | 5 | 0.123% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.098% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.049% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.049% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.049% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.049% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.049% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.025% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.025% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 384 of the 601 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,061 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 601 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 287 posts held from the last 30 days (2.44%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Selamat akhir pekan ges cukup sekali mingu ini , makasi mimin🙏
Profit di 2 akun min hari ini, terimakasih mimin 🥰
Absen min
ini lah males nya entry kalo lagi ada news isinya spike Be semua 🤣
kirain bisa tembus 4021
Lumayan dapet nfp lot kecil
Smga sampe min haha
Ckup dah latihan jantung nya volatil sangat 😪
Udah siap belom?
🔥16
Join vip chat @kontakadminbt
Yukk join live sebelum NFP https://www.tiktok.com/@ardanaptra/live?enter_from_merge=share&enter_method=share_copy_link
Showing the 12 most recent of 601 posts we hold for @BillionaireTrader99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@BillionaireTrader99 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 5 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 24 October 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Kalian gimana hari ini?
- Menyala 🔥41%
- Belum beruntung 🥹62%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Subuh nanti pencet tombol apa kalian?
- Naik ke puncak gunung46%
- Turun ke dasar lautan59%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
morning Kalian biasa trade di sesi apa guys? 🤔
- Asia54%
- London31%
- Newyork54%
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Kalau kalian gimana?
- cuancuancuan57%
- ga beruntung...49%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Gimana?
- Belom trade31%
- Lagi running profit19%
- Belom beruntung56%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Malam ini kalian tim apa?
- Buy64%
- Sell40%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 601 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Markas_Trader · 31,042#1
@simbacryptogrup · 18,512#2
@Trading_Camp · 38,654#3
@tomketloversreborn · 79,198#4
@swaincrypto · 8,358#5
@cryptocatcircle · 7,979#6
@coin_edu · 1,518#7
@Putratradityacademy · 81#8
@cryptonologyIndo · 17,181#9
@saillytradinggroup · 42,141#10
@reichtumcuan · 5,845#11
@theyescoin · 5,179,250#12
@FourX_insider · 9,385#13
@GlobalMarkets369 · 4,276#14
@ASTrading77 · 39,025#15
@sinyalcryptooo · 14,642#16
@cryptoteknikal_id · 26,068#17
@tradeanytimeid · 6,976#18
@Crptopouuse · 7,770#19
@indocukong · 40,359#20
@DosenCrypto · 8,366#21
@WolvesTradingGroup · 6,339#22
@cryptomiciners · 7,201#23
@tradersfi · 801#24
@milyaderboycrypto · 5,949#25
@thetruthsignal · 8,301#26
@sarjanaairdropcrypto · 7,006#27
@cryptoo_hunter · 2,764#28
@tkcryptochannel · 1#29
@blackcryptoid · 2,022#30
@MWcryptojournal · 9,700#31
@BeritaCryptoo · 34,231#32
@tradeallcoin · 19,618#33
@dogs · 6,466,181#34
@airdropfind · 516,100#35
@vip_whalaces · 35,561#36
@blumcrypto · 12,887,019#37
@ruangcrypto_official · 19,086#38
@WatcherGuru · 631,925#39
@notcoin · 7,885,777#40
@JOVFXMastery · 6,376#41
@catizenann · 3,326,368#42
@jsxproid · 55,057#43
@REKTbinance · 19,575#44
@cryptosiastdrops · 30,861#45
@Cats_housewtf · 7,075,612#46
@ruangcrypto_2 · 6,226#47
@Duckmoonhunterr · 2,638 (as read 3 September 2026)#48
@ceritatradingoneway · 21,640#49
@kaptencrypto707 · 91,460#50
@kianixcrypto · 6,645#51
@TradingCampFX · 12,006#52
@atcryptochannel · 14,775#53
@news_crypto · 99,690#54
@evolution_trading · 8,967#55
@next10xgem1 · 321,650#56
@cryptocoffee08 · 4,683#57
@WhalessB · 1,954#58
@cryptofamsdavid · 6,245#59
@persugihandigital · 9,681#60
@xMagicCrypto · 9,329#61
@EmakSignal · 4,335#62
@Gorrilla_crypt · 13,130 (as read 3 September 2026)#63
@otakcuanindonesiaofficial · 1,821#64
@KaptenCuanCrypto · 11,760#65
@Hiswander · 10,082#66
@whale_alert_io · 295,924#67
@CryptoCUANTERUS · 5,284#68
@kingandkongcrypto · 5,758#69
@BCUSAReal · 145,340#70
@xiancrypto88 · 5,684#71
@kenwilboyfx · 73,258#72
@kjoacademy · 28,412#73
@whalebotalerts · 142,104#74
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ceritatradingoneway · 21,640
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
@ASTrading77 · 39,025
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@registerkfxvip · 42,541
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
@bvg_blackvipgroup · 25,292
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 10 September 2026
@simbacryptogrup · 18,512
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 October 2026
@Markas_Trader · 31,042
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 September 2026
@saillytradinggroup · 42,141
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
@tkcryptochannel · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
@diginvestid · 38
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
@cryptocium · 75,144
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@Trading_Camp · 38,654
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@kenwilboyfx · 73,258
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@sahamsuksesberkah01 · 30,384
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026
@SupXPload · 58,073
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
@jsxproid · 55,057
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@dailyrekom · 25,724
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026
@belvinmology · 67,911
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@VipExness · 26,017
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 September 2026
@vip_whalaces · 35,561
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
@openkerja · 251,899
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
@japsku · 99,293
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
@ruangcrypto_official · 19,086
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 October 2026
@kiboyhx · 24,871
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
@movzold · 56,049
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Billionaire Trader💸” (@BillionaireTrader99), 32,672 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BillionaireTrader99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.