در هفته پیش رو دو سطح 101.50-102.50 105.00-106.50 برای فروشندگان نفت WTI مهمه و مناسب برای موقعیتهای sell در هفته پیش رو دو سطح 94.00-95.00 90.00-92.00 برای خریداران نفت WTI مهمه و مناسب برای موقعیتهای buy
👍186

Channel
@cloobmali
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
107,909subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001396433337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cloobmali |
| Description | این کانال رو هم دنبال کنید 👇👇👇👇 @halakoeivip |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cloobmali |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 107,909 | -98 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 108,007 | -134 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 108,141 | -81 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 108,222 | -18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 108,240 | +786 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 107,454 | -26 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 107,480 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 107,476 | -44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 107,520 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:44 | 107,525 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 107,536 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 107,533 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 107,542 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 107,545 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 107,563 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 107,571 | -27 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 107,598 | -20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 107,618 | +25 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 107,593 | -15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 107,608 | first reading |
79 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 79 (27 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 943,100 |
| Reactions total | 10,932 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 09:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
23,190 reactions across 79 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23,190 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
در هفته پیش رو دو سطح 101.50-102.50 105.00-106.50 برای فروشندگان نفت WTI مهمه و مناسب برای موقعیتهای sell در هفته پیش رو دو سطح 94.00-95.00 90.00-92.00 برای خریداران نفت WTI مهمه و مناسب برای موقعیتهای buy
👍186
گزارش و خبری که باعث فشار فروش روی نفت شد و حتی اثر قوی تر از حملات اکراین و روسیه داشت 👇🏻 آمریکا با سرعت زیادی داره واردات نفت از ونزوئلا رو بالا میبره واردات هفتگی نفت خام آمریکا از ونزوئلا هفته گذشته ۱۸۳ هزار بشکه در روز افزایش پیدا کرده و به ۷۸۲ هزار بشکه در روز رسیده این بالاترین سطح هفتگی از اوت ۲۰۱۷ تاکنونه طی ۶ ماه گذشته هم واردات نفت ونزوئلا حدود ۵۵۰ هزار بشکه در روز بیشتر شده یعنی رشد ۲۳۷٪ میانگین وا…
👍153
ترامپ گفته آمریکا درباره ایران وارد مرحله تصمیمگیری شده و احتمالاً در آینده نزدیک اتفاقات مهمی رخ میده او گزینههای پیش رو رو اینطور مطرح کرده تشدید فشار و حملات علیه ایران ادامه فشار اقتصادی یا رسیدن به یک توافق ترامپ همچنین با لحنی تهدیدآمیز گفته ایران باید قبل از تشدید بیشتر درگیریها رفتار خودش رو تغییر بده رویترز هم در گزارشهای اخیر نوشته ترامپ همچنان بین تشدید فشار بر ایران و باز گذاشتن مسیر توافق در حال…
👍189
#USD یکی از عجیبترین رشدهای امسال بازار مربوط به ETF حملونقل نفتکشهاست صندوق Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF با نماد BWET طی ۱۲ ماه گذشته حدود ۵۸۲۰٪ رشد کرده این ETF به قراردادهای آتی مربوط به هزینه حمل نفت خام از خاورمیانه و غرب آفریقا به چین و سایر مقاصد وابستهست یعنی هرچه اختلال در مسیرهای حمل نفت بیشتر بشه و کرایه نفتکشها بالا بره BWET هم حساسیت زیادی به این تغییرات نشون میده فقط از ابتدای ۲۰۲۶ این صندوق …
👍137
#USD #Bonds آیا بازده اوراق ۱۰ساله آمریکا میتونه به ۶٪ برسه؟ اگر الگوی تاریخی چرخههای افزایش نرخ بهره تکرار بشه، جواب میتونه بله باشه از سال ۱۹۶۳ تاکنون، بازده اوراق ۱۰ساله در ۶ ماه اول بعد از شروع افزایش نرخ بهره بهطور میانگین حدود ۵۰ واحد پایه رشد کرده در بازه ۱۲ ماهه این افزایش بهطور میانگین به ۱۱۰ واحد پایه رسیده اگر همین الگو این بار هم تکرار بشه، بازده ۱۰ساله آمریکا میتونه سال آینده از ۶٪ عبور کنه س…
👍193
#USD انتظار بازار اینه که فدرال رزرو در نشست ۱۶ سپتامبر نرخ بهره رو ۰.۲۵٪ افزایش بده و محدوده نرخ به ۳.۷۵ تا ۴٪ برسه عامل اصلی تغییر انتظارات هم تورم ناشی از جهش قیمت انرژی و مخصوصاً گازوئیله نکته مهم اینه که افزایش نرخ بهره مستقیماً قیمت نفت یا سوخت رو پایین نمیاره فدرال رزرو نمیتونه با افزایش نرخ بهره عرضه نفت رو بیشتر کنه یا اختلال مسیرهای انرژی رو برطرف کنه کاری که انجام میده اینه که با بالا بردن هزینه استق…
👍250
#USD بیکاری بلندمدت در آمریکا دوباره داره به سطوح نگرانکننده میرسه تعداد افرادی که بیش از ۲۷ هفته بیکار بودن در ماه اوت با افزایش ۱۵۵ هزار نفری به ۱.۹۳ میلیون نفر رسیده این چهارمین رقم بالای ثبتشده از دسامبر ۲۰۲۱ تاکنونه سهم بیکاری بلندمدت از کل بیکاری هم با رشد ۱.۵ واحد درصدی به ۲۷٪ رسیده سومین سطح بالا از دسامبر ۲۰۲۱ این شاخص حالا بیش از ۳ ساله که روند صعودی داره برای مقایسه در فوریه ۲۰۲۳ فقط ۱۷.۸٪ از بیکار…
👍152
#USD بازده اوراق ۱۰ساله آمریکا وارد یکی از طولانیترین دورههای نرخ بهره بالا در چند دهه اخیر شده این بازده برای ۷۳ ماه متوالی بالاتر از کف ۲ساله خودش معامله شده طولانیترین دوره از سال ۱۹۶۷ تاکنون اگر این روند در سپتامبر هم ادامه پیدا کنه تعداد ماهها به ۷۴ میرسه و سومین دوره طولانی تاریخ ثبت میشه نکته جالب اینه که سال ۱۹۶۷ هم وسط یک روند صعودی بلندمدت در بازده اوراق بود روندی که تا اوایل دهه ۱۹۸۰ ادامه داشت از…
👍155
کامنت بگذارید لایککنید و تشویق کنید کسانی که دستشون به دهنشون میرسه به دیگران کمک کنن
👍817
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdRnP5wNsy1/?stkn=YTcwMjBzeGt3MnZ3
👍336
تا میتونید کمک کردن هاتون رو شو کنید
👍386
چقدر برای این کلیپ اشکریختم
👍378
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @cloobmali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 256 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمد هلاکوئی” (@cloobmali), 107,909 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cloobmali.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.