منبع تحلیل میم کوین ها اینجاست

Channel
ساتوشی ON TIME
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
83,397subscribers
-1,603 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001751061828 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC |
| Description | به نام خدا تحلیل بیتکوین ، طلا ، دلار دنیای ارزهای دیجیتال تحلیل و گزارش لحظه ای بازار تعرفه تبلیغات : @TB_SATOSHI1 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Satoshi_GOLD_BTC |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 83,397 | -124 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 83,521 | -75 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 83,596 | -55 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 83,651 | -99 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 83,750 | -29 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 83,779 | +5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 83,774 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:06 | 83,780 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 83,771 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:45 | 83,773 | -42 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 83,815 | -50 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 83,865 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 83,875 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 83,889 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 83,907 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 83,941 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 83,951 | -32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 83,983 | -26 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 84,009 | -75 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 84,084 | first reading |
Engagement
556 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 138 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.8%
- avg views ÷ 83,397 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15,700
- 362 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 362
- of 556 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 556 (5 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,677,280 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 01:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,000
- Videos
- ≈131
- Links
- ≈1,980
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 01s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🚀فوری یه میمکوین انفجاری روی Sol پیدا کردیم همراهم باشید که بترکونیم 💎عضو (میمکوین چی) بشید قراره بترکونیم: 👇 https://t.me/+B7mO8yPGrxY0OTJk
غیررسمی : ترامپ تو سخنرانی سازمان ملل میخواد به ایران اعلام جنگ کنه / به گفته برخی کارشناسان
با اومدن آدم فضاییا بیتکوین هم پامپ شده ارز رایج مریخ
فوووووری بشقاب پرنده فضاییا تو ایران تو دنیا ترند شده
خبررررررررریه ؟؟
✔️ تحلیلها و سیگنالها دقیق میخوای مثل امروز که بیتکوین 85 هزار دلاری رو گفتیم. بیا اینجا👇 💎@XSignalcom💎@XSignalcom 💎@XSignalcom💎@XSignalcom
🚨 اگر تریدری این 34 اصــــطلاح از نون شبـــ برات واجبــــ تره ... من “ امیرم ” و اینجا خبری از سیگنالهای فیک و حاشیه نیست فقط نکات کلیدی ، تحلیلهای لحظهای بازار و تجربیات شخصی من برای سودآوری • اگر میخوای حرفهای ترید کنی، جات اینجاست 👇👇👇 💎@XSignalcom💎@XSignalcom 💎@XSignalcom💎@XSignalcom ( اینو بفرس واسه اون رفیقتــــ که تازه ترید رو شروع کرده )
خبررررررررریه ؟؟
چنل رایگان مون تو هفته گذشته..👀 1- Fil Long ‼️ 245% 🔥 2- Inj Long ‼️ 90% 🔥 3- Eth Long ‼️ 120% 🔥 4- Op Long ‼️ 120% 🔥 ترکوندیم..🔥 این هفته رو از دست نده.. https://t.me/+4KkEegNT62EzNTFk https://t.me/+4KkEegNT62EzNTFk
خبررررررررریه ؟؟ نفت دامپ شده
فوووووووری دوج پامپ شده
Showing the 12 most recent of 556 posts we hold for @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 14 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@GOLDVSBTC1 · 44,133#1
@crypto_shekar · 14,408#2
@CryptoMarket_BitBoy · 22,570#3
@cryptoplusers · 461,457#4
@Nobitexmag · 148,847#5
@nobitexmarket · 319,385#6
@bitfa · 223,347#7
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 106,677#8
@farhad1356 · 79,336#9
@TROON · 1,617,080#10
@lordcryptovip · 809,725#11
@Cryptofa_official · 44,962#12
@Caspian_Crypto · 84,695#13
@signallbinance · 13,673#14
@iMTProto · 7,490,676#15
@Cryptoo_neews · 21,342#16
@arash_timess · 425,641#17
@Signal_Alpha · 167,505#18
@khancryptoir · 220,481#19
@lordcryptovipbot · 25,768#20
@AmirCrypttoo · 11,469#21
@irmemecoin · 19,153#22
@Radcryptosignal · 95,494#23
@RstCrypto · 393,408#24
@Real_Ayhan · 113,782#25
@trade_hadi · 447,836#26
@arz_jo · 16,414#27
@ucn_ir · 161,108#28
@doctormemecoin · 3,440#29
@officialpersiatwiter · 567,891#30
@arzdigitalb · 54,783#31
@bsignal · 441,806#32
@cloobmali · 107,909#33
@arzdigital · 108,874#34
@tatcoinn · 43,808#35
@alirezamehrabi_com · 115,250#36
@YKCRYPTOchanle · 21,207#37
@CryptoT248 · 53,692#38
@telonews_fa · 86,149#39
@crypto_gorg · 3,967#40
@MawtinCrypto_vip · 4,961,974#41
@plus_sarmayeh · 2,261#42
@mahdiazimi_classic_patterns · 84,939#43
@shitcoink · 310,275#44
@mini_whales1 · 3,445#45
@nobitexprices · 60,622#46
@CryptoPlus_company · 19,018#47
@amir_ramzali · 113,230#48
@Ar3yBiT · 708,843#49
@CryptoHaj · 359,371#50
@Mr_Haji_Bit · 6,330#51
@khabarfouri_arzedigital · 30,000#52
@ch_amozshe_sirvan · 6,131#53
@naghdexx · 31#54
@mrkia7 · 54,905#55
@amirsambtc · 110,983#56
@ali_cryptoc · 12,162#57
@Crypto_Azarmi · 54,516#58
@tabdealplatform · 531,280#59
@dogs · 7,065,215#60
@varzesh3 · 1,294,925#61
@rapking · 307,869#62
@futballbadtv · 323,404#63
@notcoin · 8,643,687#64
@CottageOrg · 799,794#65
@iRoProxy · 7,897,583#66
@FutballBadBoys · 107,222#67
@cryptobyalireza · 37,244#68
@kafiha · 678,317#69
@SportBaadNews · 914,356#70
@dollar_tehran3bze · 646,522#71
@Dashaghnews · 112,241#72
@khabar_fouri · 1,180,965#73
@drtel · 774,803#74
@alonews · 965,261#75
@vaarzesh_plus · 316,357#76
@proxydaemi · 1,753,381#77
@roidbest · 1,644,807#78
@akhbarefori · 4,064,722#79
@esteghlalpage · 413,274#80
@bistodo · 389,064#81
@TweetyChannel · 782,246#82
@EfshaKhabar · 274,371#83
@whale_alert_io · 300,889#84
@akharinkhabar · 1,820,206#85
@Myporoxy · 4,491,818#86
@theyescoin · 5,697,036#87
@proxymtproto · 11,940,791#88
@HipHopTweety · 207,619#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@arzedegiral · 22,338
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
@CryptoMarket_BitBoy · 22,570
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 September 2026
@CryptoT248 · 53,692
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
@tatcoinn · 43,808
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
@GOLDVSBTC1 · 44,133
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@ChanelVIP20 · 54,419
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@short_cryptoo · 895,009
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
@Amirreza_shahbaziy · 82,792
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
@silverbit · 133,475
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 106,677
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@traderpasha · 102,110
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@amirsambtc · 110,983
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@crocodile_trade · 200,096
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@cryptoplusers · 461,457
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@trading1room · 23,918
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
@bufalo_cryptoo · 27,379
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@online_eghtsad · 233,663
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
@pumpex_tradee · 40,733
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
@online_gheimatt · 246,397
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
@dollartallai · 69,362
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026
@Ok_Bitcoin · 104,095
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
@NerkhTv1 · 179,835
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
@bitfa · 223,347
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
@khancryptoir · 220,481
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 471 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ساتوشی ON TIME” (@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC), 83,397 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Satoshi_GOLD_BTC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.