🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 🔴شاخص NFP ارزیابی ماه اکتبر عدد واقعی 165K🔼 عدد مورد انتظار 70K عدد قبلی 29K به عدد 60K اصلاح شد شاخص متوسط رشد دستمزد ساعتی تغییرات ماهانه اکتبر عدد واقعی 0.4%🔼 عدد مورد انتظار 0.3% عدد قبلی 0.1% شاخص نرخ بیکاری عدد واقعی 4.1%🔽 عدد مورد انتظار 4.2% عدد قبلی 4.2% #USD

Channel
Crypto & navasan
@crrypto_navasan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,200subscribers
+11,423 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001572612523 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crrypto_navasan |
| Description | 📉ارائه سیگنال های رایگان اسکلپی و سرعتی فیوچرز 📈 با توجه به ریسک بالای مارکت کریپتو مسئولیت تریدهای شما با شخص شماست "جهت رزرو تبلیغات به آیدی زیر پیام بدین"👇 @Tablighcryptto |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crrypto_navasan |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 24,200 | -281 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 24,481 | -310 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:29 | 24,791 | -440 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 25,231 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:47 | 25,241 | -67 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:05 | 25,308 | -71 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 25,379 | -38 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 25,417 | -23 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 25,440 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 25,445 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:44 | 25,454 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 25,455 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 25,464 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 25,468 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 25,474 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 25,476 | -7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:08 | 25,483 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 25,485 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:17 | 25,490 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 25,495 | first reading |
Engagement
154 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.34%
- avg views ÷ 24,200 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,260
- 92 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 92
- of 154 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 154 (23 June 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 207,902 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 22:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,760
- Videos
- ≈10
- Links
- ≈86
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 26s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 92 posts held from the last 30 days (20.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
AWEIRT به تومن. ۱۶۰۰۰ کف خودش قرار گرفته اگه این کف از دست بده ریزش بیشتری خواهد کرد ولی حفظ کنه میتونه رشد کنه برسی بیشتر با خود شخص
دوج کوین خط روند خودش را شکسته. حمایتهای ۱۸۰۰۰و ۱۶۰۰۰ قیمت فعلی ۱۹۰۰۰تا ۱۶۰۰۰ مناسب برسی و خرید برسی بیشتر با خود دوستان
بیش از ۱.۲ تریلیون دلار از ارزش بازار سهام آمریکا در یک روز از بین رفت! شاخص نزدک بیش از ۳ درصد و شاخص S&P 500 حدود ۲ درصد افت کردند. موج خروج سرمایه از سهام شرکتهای فناوری و هوش مصنوعی، فضای منفی را به بازارهای مالی منتقل کرده و فشار فروش در بازار ارزهای دیجیتال را نیز افزایش داده است!
#AVAAIUSDT 🔹 پس از آن شکست، روند صعودی به نظر میرسد. ممکن است شاهد یک جهش قیمتی باشیم، بنابراین آن را دنبال کنید.
#XRPUSDT 🔹 پس از آن شکست، روند صعودی به نظر میرسد. ممکن است شاهد یک جهش قیمتی باشیم، بنابراین آن را دنبال کنید.
#USD #Stocks ▪️بازارهای آمریکا در واکنش اولیه به نتایج انتخابات میاندورهای این کشور، در تمام بخشها رشد چشمگیری را ثبت کردند: 1. شاخص S&P 500: مثبت ۱.۷٪ 2. شاخص داوجونز: مثبت ۲.۴٪ 3. شاخص نزدک ۱۰۰: مثبت ۲.۰٪ 4. نقره: مثبت ۵.۰٪ 5. طلا: مثبت ۳.۰٪ 6. بیتکوین: مثبت ۳.۰٪ 7. نفت خام WTI: منفی ۳.۵٪ 📌 ارزش بازار سهام آمریکا امروز تاکنون ۱.۳ تریلیون دلار افزایش یافته است.
#ON 🚀 تایمفریم روزانه (1D) 📉 ارز ON پس از یک حرکت صعودی، وارد فاز اصلاح شده و در حال نزدیک شدن به محدوده حمایتی مهمیه. 🟢 محدودههای ورود احتمالی: 🔹 0.1095 – 0.1312$ 🎯 اهداف صعودی: 🚀 هدف اول: 0.20$ 🚀 هدف دوم: 0.25$ 🚀 هدف سوم: 0.33$ ↗️ از محدوده ورود اول تا هدف 0.33$، پتانسیل رشد حدود 200٪ وجود داره. ⚠️ در صورت تثبیت قیمت زیر 0.096$، سناریوی صعودی نیاز به بازبینی داره.
#FLUID 🔹تایمفریم روزانه(1D) ⚠️ارز FLUID بعد از صعود اخیر، در حال اصلاح قیمته؛ اما برای ادامه صعود، واکنش قیمت به مقاومت های مشخصشده اهمیت زیادی دارد. 🟢 محدودههای ورود احتمالی: 🔹 1,505 🔹 1,117 🎯 هدف صعودی: 🚀ناحیه هدف:2.163 🤑از محدوده های مقاومت تا هدف نهایی، پتانسیل رشد حدود ۷۵٪ وجود داره.
🚨 ۳۶ ساعت آینده میتواند شوک بزرگی را در بازارهای جهانی ایجاد کند و دلیل آن انتخابات میاندورهای ایالات متحده است. در حال حاضر. دموکراتها حدود ۷۳ درصد شانس پیروزی در مجلس نمایندگان و سنا را دارند. و بسته به نتایج، سهام ارزهای دیجیتال، هوش مصنوعی و نفت میتوانند واکنش بسیار متفاوتی نشان دهند. اگر جمهوریخواهان پیروز شوند: • ارزهای دیجیتال: ترامپ میتواند مسیر آسانتری برای تصویب قوانین طرفدار ارزهای دیجیتال، از…
⚪️ #VELVET ⚪️ نوسانات عجیبی داره به هیچ وجه برای خرید یا فیوچرز توصیه نمیشه
⚪️ #GALA ⚪️ تا زمانیکه از مقاومت ۰.۰۰۱۶۵ دلار عبور نکرده، روند صعودی استارت نخواهد خورد
Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @crrypto_navasan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @crrypto_navasan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 24 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 3 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ToranjCapital · 12,2472 postsمهندسی هوافضا پارس پژوهان
@Aerospace_ParsPajouhaan · 5,5531 postایردراپ نوبیتکس
@AirdropNobitex · 10,7731 postمعماری پارس پژوهان
@architecture_parspajouhaan · 2,4271 postمهندسی پزشکی پارس پژوهان
@bioparspajouhaan · 7,6091 postمهندسی مکانیک پارس پژوهان
@CAECAMCAD · 18,8021 postمهندسی عمران پارس پژوهان
@CIVILPARSPAJOUHAAN · 6,2721 postنفت و گاز، تاسیسات و انرژی پارس پژوهان
@Installations_Energy · 5,8341 postخانه مالی توسعه
@khanemalii · 6,5001 postمهندسی مواد پارس پژوهان
@materials_parspajouhaan · 6,8161 postمدیریاری
@modiryarii · 4,2511 postمهندسی برق و کامپیوتر پارس پژوهان
@parspajouhaan_cee · 10,8931 postمهندسی شیمی پارس پژوهان
@parspajouhaan_chemistry · 6,4071 postمهندسی صنایع پارس پژوهان
@parspajouhaan_industry · 5,9051 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@arzdiigital_iran · 25,633#1
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC · 82,253#2
@nahang_trader · 4,791#3
@rabinhod_arz · 19,159#4
@GOLDVSBTC1 · 43,227#5
@signalyab1 · 41,226#6
@SirBitMiner · 741,000#7
@AmirCrypttoo · 11,300#8
@movafag_bors · 21,205#9
@ch_amozshe_sirvan · 6,115#10
@tvtsignal · 4,257#11
@SuperSignal_VIP · 235#12
@BeTas_Trade2 · 123#13
@funobitexchange · 6,167#14
@mahdiazimi_classic_patterns · 72,573#15
@Tahlil_bazar_malii · 6,675#16
@TROON · 1,406,119#17
@Capitan_traderr · 21,159#18
@cryptoplusers · 434,042#19
@Cryptoo_neews · 21,423#20
@jet_crypto1 · 41,987#21
@Forsathaye_sarmaye_gozari · 769#22
@academyrad_crypto · 7,448#23
@TheRichTraderr · 1,093#24
@farhad1356 · 70,772#25
@Hitler_Trade · 4,697#26
@mini_whales1 · 3,360#27
@best_siignal · 34,675#28
@arz_jo · 16,630#29
@CryptoMarket_BitBoy · 22,141#30
@amirsambtc · 107,321 (as read 2 October 2026)#31
@digimoon2020 · 1,310#32
@bitfa · 231,922#33
@VIPBOORSI1 · 14,851#34
@airdrop2423 · 320 (as read 2 October 2026)#35
@academy_bagherpour · 5,899#36
@fire_trade · 886#37
@signal_navid · 7,014#38
@Farid_Hashemi · 1,046#39
@bit1gram · 10,609#40
@beesttrade · 769#41
@Crypto_Club2 · 3,593#42
@hamester2233 · 2,325#43
@ali_cryptoc · 11,956#44
@DailyTechAi · 17,492#45
@Real_Ayhan · 109,597#46
@AMOOZESH_TRADERS · 42,832#47
@khancryptoir · 366,812#48
@shitcoink · 345,893#49
@SuperiorAnalysis · 7,582#50
@vipbingx · 4,312#51
@traderpasha · 114,661 (as read 2 October 2026)#52
@bufalo_cryptoo · 26,413#53
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 103,035#54
@gold_signaalll · 21,275#55
@Cryptosignal120251 · 3,257#56
@professorbtc14 · 3,838#57
@tahlillbartar · 28,360#58
@zarinsignal_com · 5,768#59
@metaarz11 · 3#60
@fundora_finance · 6,585#61
@akhbar_arz_bours · 15,822#62
@Airdrops_univers · 107,644#63
@FreeFilter1 · 49,066#64
@USAMRYDATA · 8,173#65
@crypto_shekar · 13,297#66
@sahamedalatbors · 20,045#67
@antn_news · 17,611#68
@sahamsoodavar · 13,278#69
@Shahr_E_Khamosh · 16,139#70
@vippup · 51,712#71
@pulsepack · 27,118#72
@Sparta_Power · 13,569#73
@GLYXAi · 851#74
@Artshan_ir · 20,008#75
@ccnnetwork · 3,290#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@arzdiigital_iran · 25,633
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 October 2026
@movafag_bors · 21,205
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 October 2026
@rabinhod_arz · 19,159
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 October 2026
@DailyTechAi · 17,492
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 3 October 2026
@sahamedalatbors · 20,045
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 September 2026
@FreeFilter1 · 49,066
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 25 August 2026
@Havadesdaq · 23,508
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 16 September 2026
@signalyab1 · 41,226
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
@alanchandcom · 34,016
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
@gold_signaalll · 21,275
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
@tahlillbartar · 28,360
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@bufalo_cryptoo · 26,413
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@English_Mr_Karimi · 59,749
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto & navasan” (@crrypto_navasan), 24,200 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crrypto_navasan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.