Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
144,000 average views per post against 12,504 subscribers — an engagement rate of 1152.3%. Across the 8,242 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,620 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.18% and 15.4%, with a median of 7.64%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (12 August 2026 – 11 September 2026)
Posts measured
28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
4,034,340
Mature posts only
1194.7% over 27 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 11 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 40 days, net +857. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,439–12,643 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 03:15
12,438
-15
13 Sept 2026, 15:37
12,453
-21
11 Sept 2026, 19:41
12,474
-30
9 Sept 2026, 07:56
12,504
+62
6 Sept 2026, 01:57
12,442
-13
3 Sept 2026, 22:19
12,455
+45
2 Sept 2026, 17:03
12,410
+10
1 Sept 2026, 12:14
12,400
+23
31 Aug 2026, 11:48
12,377
-22
30 Aug 2026, 11:35
12,399
-15
29 Aug 2026, 09:35
12,414
+1
28 Aug 2026, 08:58
12,413
-10
27 Aug 2026, 07:38
12,423
-11
26 Aug 2026, 06:17
12,434
-16
25 Aug 2026, 07:27
12,450
-13
24 Aug 2026, 05:47
12,463
+10
22 Aug 2026, 15:32
12,453
-17
21 Aug 2026, 09:07
12,470
+5
20 Aug 2026, 12:42
12,465
+51
19 Aug 2026, 11:38
12,414
first reading
Engagement
66 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
682.3%
avg views ÷ 12,438 subscribers
Avg views / post
84,900
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.023%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 66 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
66 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
1,782,280
Reactions total
413
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 21:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,117 reactions across 65 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
484
43.3%
👍
296
26.5%
👏
104
9.31%
🔥
67
6.00%
😭
31
2.78%
🙏
25
2.24%
🤔
24
2.15%
🤝
21
1.88%
👌
17
1.52%
🏆
13
1.16%
🫡
13
1.16%
😢
11
0.985%
🎉
3
0.269%
😱
3
0.269%
💯
2
0.179%
😍
2
0.179%
🤩
1
0.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
با مشاوره ترنج، اولین پلتفرم سینمایی در فرابورس درج نماد شد
🟢«شرکت مشاور سرمایهگذاری ترنج»، فرآیند درج نماد شرکت فناوران ایدهپرداز سرزمین هنر (سینما تیکت) را در فرابورس با موفقیت به انجام رساند.
بعد از این مرحله فرآیند ارزشگذاری و در نهایت عرضهاولیه این شرکت در بازار نوآفرین فرابورس به انجام خواهد رسید.
ترنج در حوزه تامین مالی خدمات متنوعی به کسبوکارها ارائه میکند که شامل موارد زیر هستند:
🟢 عرضه و پذیرش د…
چشمانداز دلار و طلا در تقاطع تنشهای ژئوپلتیکی و ناترازیهای داخلی
🟢بازار ارز و طلا در ماههای پیشرو مسیر خود را چگونه پیدا میکند؟ وزن اخبار بینالملل بیشتر است یا متغیرهای بنیادی اقتصاد ایران؟
🟢در این تحلیل صوتی، سیاوش غفاری، مدیر تحلیل اقتصاد کلان ترنج، اثر همزمان تحولات سیاست خارجی و ناترازیهای کلان را بر سناریوهای پیشروی دلار و طلا تحلیل میکند.
▫️ @ToranjCapital
پشتوانه صندوق طلای رز ترنج چگونه شکل میگیرد؟
🟢از ورود طلا به بورس کالا و تأیید اصالت آن تا نگهداری در خزانه و تشکیل پرتفوی صندوق، مراحل مشخصی طی میشود تا هر واحد صندوق طلای رز ترنج، از پشتوانه فیزیکی طلا برخوردار باشد.
🟢این اینفوگراف را مشاهده کنید تا بهصورت کامل با نحوه تأسیس، امنیت و پشتوانه صندوق طلای رز ترنج آشنا شوید.
▫️ @ToranjCapital
سرمایهگذاری، یک نسخه برای همه ندارد
🟢هر سرمایهگذار هدف، افق زمانی و میزان ریسکپذیری متفاوتی دارد؛ به همین دلیل، در ترنج تلاش میکنیم با طراحی و مدیریت راهکارهای متنوع سرمایهگذاری، برای نیازهای متفاوت، انتخابهای متناسبی فراهم کنیم.
🟢از درآمد ثابت و طلا تا سهام، نقره و راهکارهای ترکیبی؛ هر کدام با استراتژی متفاوت، برای یک نیاز متفاوت.
▫️ @ToranjCapital
سود سرمایهگذاری را چطور باید اندازه گرفت؟
🟢صرفا مثبت بودن بازدهی یک سرمایهگذاری به این معنی نیست که واقعا ثروتمندتر شدهایم؛ بهخصوص در شرایط تورمی، مهم است ببینیم قدرت خرید سرمایه ما چقدر تغییر کرده است.
🟢مدیر سرمایهگذاری صندوق طلای رز ترنج توضیح میدهد که چطور میتوان با در نظر گرفتن تورم، نگاه دقیقتری به سود واقعی سرمایهگذاری داشت.
▫️ @ToranjCapital
دریافت تمکن مالی با خرید ETF طلای «رز ترنج»
🟢 یکی از مزایای جانبی خرید صندوق طلای «رز ترنج»، امکان دریافت گواهی تمکنمالی از شرکت سپردهگذاری مرکزی اوراق بهادار است.
🟢 با خرید صندوق طلای «رز ترنج» هم ارزش پولتان را حفظ میکنید و هم میتوانید تمکن مالی با اعتبار بالا و به زبان انگلیسی دریافت کنید.
▫️ خرید رز ترنج از ساعت ۱۲:۰۰ تا ۱۸:۰۰ و با جستوجوی نماد «رز ترنج» در تمام کارگزاریها امکانپذیر است.
🖥 برای آشنایی …
سرمایهگذاری در بهترینهای بازار سهام
🟢 صندوقهای سهامی ترنج با دو رویکرد متفاوت در سرمایهگذاری طراحی شدهاند تا پاسخگوی نیاز سرمایهگذاران با سطوح مختلف ریسکپذیری باشند. صندوق سرو با ساختار سهامی کلاسیک و تمرکز بر تحلیل بنیادی، گزینهای مناسب برای سرمایهگذاران با رویکرد متعادل است؛ در حالی که صندوق نارنج اهرم با سازوکار اهرمی، امکان کسب بازدهی بالاتر در شرایط صعودی بازار را فراهم میکند.
🟢 ترکیب سرمایهگذاری د…
افق زمانی سرمایهگذاری (Time Horizon)
🟢 افق زمانی یعنی بازهای که سرمایهگذار میتواند بدون نیاز فوری به پول، نوسان دارایی را تحمل کند. این مفهوم نقش اصلی را در تعیین میزان ریسک قابلپذیرش دارد.
🟢 تفاوت افقهای زمانی بیشتر در «تحمل نوسان» است. نوسان در بازههای کوتاه میتواند به تصمیمهای احساسی منجر شود، اما در افقهای بلندتر، بخشی طبیعی از مسیر بازدهی محسوب میشود.
🟢 خطای رایج این است که افق زمانی و رفتار سرمایه…
قبل از صعود طلا، سرمایهگذاری کنید
🟢 بررسی روند سالهای گذشته نشان میدهد بازار طلا در نیمه دوم سال غالبا بازدهی مثبتی داشته است. افزایش تقاضای تجاری برای ارز، تشدید انتظارات تورمی و رشد تقاضا برای حفظ ارزش داراییها از عواملی هستند که میتوانند در این دوره بر قیمت دلار و طلای داخلی اثر بگذارند.
🟢 صندوق طلای «رز ترنج» با مدیریت فعال ترکیب گواهی سپرده شمش و سکه و استفاده از ابزارهای آپشن، تلاش میکند متناسب با شرایط…
توهم زیانگریزی (Loss Aversion)
🟢 زیانگریزی یکی از خطاهای شناختی رایج در سرمایهگذاری است که باعث میشود رنج حاصل از «از دست دادن پول» بسیار شدیدتر از لذت «به دست آوردن همان مقدار سود» تجربه شود. بهطور میانگین، درد از دست دادن ۱۰۰ میلیون تومان، حدود دو برابر لذت سود کردن همان مبلغ است.
🟢 همین سوگیری رفتاری باعث میشود بسیاری از سرمایهگذاران سهمهای زیانده را برای مدت طولانی نگه دارند، به امید اینکه قیمت برگردد …
اطلاعیه
به اطلاع سرمایهگذاران و همراهان محترم
صندوق اهرمی نارنج میرساند؛
پیرو بروز اختلال فنی موقت در نرمافزار حسابداری و بهتبع آن عدم نمایش دقیق خالص ارزش داراییها (NAV) و حباب قیمتی در سامانه، نماد معاملاتی «نارنج» جهت حفظ شفافیت بازار و صیانت از حقوق سرمایهگذاران، با هماهنگی نهاد محترم ناظر بهصورت موقت متوقف شده است.
تیم فنی «مشاور سرمایهگذاری ترنج» با همکاری شرکت تدبیرپرداز (ارائهدهنده خدمات نرمافزاری)…
😢6🫡5❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @ToranjCapital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ToranjCapital edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔵 با یک میلیارد تومان در چه صندوقهایی سرمایهگذاری میکنید؟
🟢 درآمد ثابت (افران و ترنج ثابت)26%
🟢 سهامی (سرو و انار)15%
🟢 طلا (رز ترنج)37%
🟢 مختلط (زیتون)9%
🟢 اهرمی (نارنج اهرم)40%
🟢 فراصندوق (تمشک)7%
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 197 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
گروه نوویرا | Novira Group @noviraco · 35,379 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
گروه مالی فیروزه | Firouzeh @firouzeh · 42,060 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
ترید فاند @trade_fundd · 24,459 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
گروه مالی فارابی @farabinvest · 51,652 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
گروه آگاه | Agah Group @agahcom · 67,358 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
چالوس سیتی @chaluscity1 · 30,784 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا @etfplus · 29,128 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
مرجع صندوقهای طلا @Fundbase_Gold · 39,090 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
کانال رسمی آموزش مفید @mofidsecuritiesofficial · 79,141 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
مرجع صندوقهای سرمایهگذاری @Fundbase_ir · 73,785 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
کانال عرضه اولیه @arzeh1avalieh1 · 25,462 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
استخدام در نهادهای مالی - کانون کارگزاران @SEBAemployment · 26,399 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
هاتف سیدپور @hatef_invest · 148,695 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
بیدار بورس @bidarbourse · 27,468 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
علوم بانکی @olombanki · 36,857 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
محسن تحلیل | Mohsen Tahlil @mohsen_tahlil · 37,893 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مشاور سرمایهگذاری ترنج” (@ToranjCapital), 12,438 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ToranjCapital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.