Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 74 days, net -756. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,496–39,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Oct 2026, 04:27
38,609
-19
18 Oct 2026, 03:36
38,628
-2
17 Oct 2026, 00:45
38,630
-23
15 Oct 2026, 23:19
38,653
-31
14 Oct 2026, 20:56
38,684
-8
13 Oct 2026, 14:27
38,692
-51
9 Oct 2026, 18:55
38,743
-63
5 Oct 2026, 13:54
38,806
-45
29 Sept 2026, 20:02
38,851
-219
18 Sept 2026, 02:59
39,070
-20
16 Sept 2026, 01:37
39,090
-60
14 Sept 2026, 09:01
39,150
-7
12 Sept 2026, 18:40
39,157
-36
10 Sept 2026, 16:38
39,193
-38
7 Sept 2026, 13:01
39,231
-21
4 Sept 2026, 17:20
39,252
-14
3 Sept 2026, 02:27
39,266
-13
1 Sept 2026, 22:04
39,279
-11
31 Aug 2026, 18:56
39,290
+6
30 Aug 2026, 20:43
39,284
first reading
Engagement
357 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 140 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.49%
avg views ÷ 38,609 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,890
150 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.441%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
150
of 357 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 148 of 150 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held
357 (1 August 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total
433,948
Reactions total
1,898
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Oct 2026, 18:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,780
Videos
≈44
Links
≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 02m
Average length
6m 59s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,118 reactions across 354 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,217
52.6%
👍
2,342
38.3%
🔥
237
3.87%
🏆
200
3.27%
🎉
122
1.99%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 355 of the 357 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 357 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟡 رشد ملایم بهای طلا در پی عقبنشینی قیمت نفت و بازنگری نرخ بهره فدرال رزرو
📌 نکات کلیدی
◾️ رشد ٪۰٫۲ قیمت اونس طلای جهانی و رسیدن به سطح ۴٬۱۷۱٫۶۵ دلار
◾️ کاهش احتمال رشد نرخ بهره فدرال رزرو در ماه جاری به ٪۱۵
◾️ قیمتگذاری احتمال ٪۸۹ افزایش نرخ بهره در نشست ماه دسامبر
🔎 جمعبندی
واکنش بازدهی اوراق و دلار به بازنگری چشمانداز بهره، ریسک اصلی نوسانات اونس طلا در کوتاهمدت خواهد بود.
@Fundbase_ir | فاندبیس
مرجع صندو…
📊 نوسان جریان نقدینگی در صندوقهای طلا و پیشتازی نماد عیار در هفته پایانی مهر
🔎 روند کلی: در آخرین هفته ثبت شده، صندوقهای طلا شاهد ورود ۷۲۴ میلیارد تومان نقدینگی بودند که نسبت به هفتههای آغازین مهرماه کاهش یافته است.
📈 نکات کلیدی:
🔹 بیشترین جذب نقدینگی هفتگی: نماد عیار با ورود ۲،۹۴۳ میلیارد تومان.
🔹 رتبههای بعدی: نگین فارس (۴۹.۳ میلیارد) و درنا (۳۹.۴ میلیارد).
🔹 سقف تاریخی یکساله: هفته ۴ شهریور با ورود ۳۲،۱۹۵ م…
❓سوال مهم
چرا پلتفرمهای آنلاین طلا بجای خرید شمش فیزیکی و انبار کردن در بانکها، گواهی سپرده شمش خریداری نمیکردند تا همه چیز شفاف و مطمئن و قابل رصد باشد؟
برای نقد کردن پول مردم فروش گواهی شمش در بورس کالا سخت تر است یا تحویل شمش از انبار بانک و فروش در بازار آزاد و دریافت وجه ناشی از فروش؟
هر جا شفافیت نبود، فرار کنید!
@Fundbase_Gold | فاندبیس
مرجع صندوقهای طلا
🟡 چشمانداز اونس جهانی طلا در افق ۲۰۲۶؛ سناریوهای نهادهای بینالمللی تا ۶۲۵۰ دلار
📌 نکات کلیدی
◾️ سناریوی پایه استیت استریت با شانس ٪۷۰، دامنه نوسان طلا را بین ۴٬۷۵۰ تا ۵٬۵۰۰ دلار برآورد میکند.
◾️ در سناریوی صعودی با احتمال ٪۱۵، هدف قیمتی به محدوده ۵٬۵۰۰ تا ۶٬۲۵۰ دلار میرسد.
◾️ میانگین پیشبینی نظرسنجی LBMA و تحلیلگر استاندارد چارترد رقم ۴٬۷۸۸ دلار است، در حالی که متالز فوکوس میانگین ۴٬۸۵۰ دلار را هدف گرفته است.
◾…
📊 گزارش رشد دارایی صندوقهای طلا؛ همیان در صدر رتبهبندی مهرماه
📈 بررسی عملکرد ۳۳ صندوق طلا در یک ماه اخیر نشاندهنده تداوم رشد در این بخش است.
📌 نکات کلیدی گزارش:
🔹 همیان با رشد ۴۳.۴۶ درصدی صدرنشین شد.
🔹 فاصله رتبه اول و دوم (رزگلد) به ۱۹.۴۲ درصد رسید.
🔹 کل دارایی تحت مدیریت این گروه به بیش از ۱,۰۵۴ هزار میلیارد تومان رسیده است.
⚖️ برترینهای ماه:
۱. همیان: ۴۳.۴۶٪ 🥇
۲. رزگلد: ۲۴.۰۴٪ 🥈
۳. رز ترنج: ۱۷.۸۵٪ 🥉
✅ روند…
🟡 رکورد ورود سرمایه به صندوقهای طلا در تقابل با فشار بازدهی اوراق
جریان سرمایه ۳۱ میلیارد دلاری به ETFهای جهانی و خرید ۳۹ تن طلا توسط بانکهای مرکزی، پشتوانهای محکم برای اونس ایجاد کرده است؛ هرچند بازده اوراق آمریکا محرکهای رشد را مهار میکند.
📌 نکات کلیدی
◾️ جذب ۳۱ میلیارد دلار سرمایه جدید توسط صندوقهای ETF طلا در سهماهه منتهی به سپتامبر
◾️ تداوم خریدهای استراتژیک بانکهای مرکزی با ثبت خرید ۳۹ تن در ماه اوت
◾…
Showing the 12 most recent of 357 posts we hold for @Fundbase_Gold. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ابزار بعدی اپ فاندبیس کدام باشد؟
میتوانید چند مورد را انتخاب کنید
اضافه شدن آمار جریان نقدینگی واقعی (نه فقط حقیقی)67%
اضافه شدن تاریخچه دلاری دارایی تحت مدیریت صندوق ها34%
اضافه شدن تاریخچه دلاری مارکت کپ شرکت های بورسی33%
اضافه شدن پروفایل هر کاربر با امکان انتشار پست و تحلیل21%
The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
همه بخش ها قابل فهم است و بطور ساده و روان از آن استفاده می کنم.43%
برای بررسی بخش های مختلف بعضی مواقع گیج می شوم و احساس میکنم در شهری شلوغ گم شده ام.40%
کلا نتوانستم با آن ارتباط بگیرم و کاربرد بخش های مختلف آن را نمی دانم.17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 357 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 19 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مرجع صندوقهای سرمایهگذاری @Fundbase_ir · 73,173 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
آرش مهراز - صندوق @InvestmentMind · 24,872 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Hamed Kiani | حامد کیانی @hamed_kianiiii · 38,538 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا @etfplus · 29,553 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
شرکت سبدگردان زاگرس @zagrosassetmanagement · 18,024 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 October 2026
محسن تحلیل | Mohsen Tahlil @mohsen_tahlil · 39,564 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
بورس آنلاین|O.B @ON_bourse · 30,274 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
کانال رسمی آموزش مفید @mofidsecuritiesofficial · 78,814 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
مطالعات اقتصادى بامداد @bamdad_institute · 23,640 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
گروه نوویرا | Novira Group @noviraco · 31,031 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
گروه مالی فیروزه | Firouzeh @firouzeh · 53,111 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
سیگنال و تحلیل سهام بورسکده @boursekadam · 55,409 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
بورسار | مجتبی سلطانی @BoursarMedia · 34,320 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
جواد نصر | سلام بورس @salam_bourse · 36,781 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مرجع صندوقهای طلا” (@Fundbase_Gold), 38,609 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fundbase_Gold.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.