27 measurements spanning 28 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,161–39,392 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 02:27
39,266
-13
1 Sept 2026, 22:04
39,279
-11
31 Aug 2026, 18:56
39,290
+6
30 Aug 2026, 20:43
39,284
-18
29 Aug 2026, 18:19
39,302
-8
28 Aug 2026, 17:23
39,310
-3
27 Aug 2026, 19:23
39,313
+18
26 Aug 2026, 20:47
39,295
+64
25 Aug 2026, 23:02
39,231
+27
23 Aug 2026, 15:57
39,204
+16
22 Aug 2026, 00:06
39,188
-10
20 Aug 2026, 15:22
39,198
-11
19 Aug 2026, 15:12
39,209
+12
18 Aug 2026, 15:18
39,197
-11
17 Aug 2026, 16:54
39,208
-1
16 Aug 2026, 14:17
39,209
-9
14 Aug 2026, 23:27
39,218
-27
13 Aug 2026, 14:16
39,245
-10
12 Aug 2026, 13:14
39,255
-16
11 Aug 2026, 11:35
39,271
first reading
Engagement
138 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 39,266 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,050
123 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.589%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
123
of 138 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
138 (1 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
497,940
Reactions total
2,931
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 20:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,600
Videos
≈36
Links
≈967
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,092 reactions across 137 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,473
47.6%
👍
1,338
43.3%
🏆
111
3.59%
🔥
110
3.56%
🎉
60
1.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 138 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟡 بازار جهانی طلا با فاندبیس
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
انتقال ۸۶ تن طلای بانک مرکزی هلند: آمادهباش ژئوپلیتیک
بانک مرکزی هلند (DNB) در اقدامی بیسابقه، ۸۶ تن از ذخایر طلای خود را از نیویورک و اتاوا به لندن منتقل کرده است. این جابهجایی بهعنوان بخشی از «آمادگی در برابر بحران» و در پی «افزایش ناآرامیهای ژئوپلیتیکی» عنوان شده است.
📌 نکات کلیدی
◾️ DNB بین مارس و اوت، ۸۶ تن طلا را جابهجا کرده است.
◾️ این عملیات شامل فروش حدود ۵۹ تن …
🟡 بازار جهانی طلا با فاندبیس
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
طلای جهانی تحت فشار فدرال رزرو و دلار به کفهای اخیر نزدیک شد
طلای جهانی تحت فشار انتظارات از سیاستهای انقباضی فدرال رزرو و تقویت دلار آمریکا، به نزدیکی کفهای اخیر قیمتی خود عقبنشینی کرده است.
📌 نکات کلیدی
◾️ قیمت لحظهای طلا در محدوده ۴٬۴۳۰ تا ۴٬۴۶۰ دلار/اونس معامله شد که کاهشی حدود ۰٫۳ تا ۰٫۵٪ را نشان میدهد.
◾️ قراردادهای آتی کامکس نیز با افت حدود ۱٫۲٪ در حدود ۴٬۴۷۰ دلار…
✔️این بار صندوقهای طلا پربازدهتر از طلای فیزیکی!
⚡️ در حالیکه طی ماههای گذشته بارها و بارها در خصوص عملکرد ضعیف تر صندوقها نسبت به طلای فیزیکی در محافل تخصصی و غیرتخصصی بحث فراوان بود اما آمار و اعداد و ارقام نشان میدهد نه تنها در بازده یک ماه اخیر بلکه در بازدهی سه ماهه و شش ماهه و حتی یک ساله نیز میانگین بازده صندوقهای طلا از انواع طلای فیزیکی پیشی گرفته است و رتبه نخست را به خود اختصاص داده است.
😎 دلار محاسباتی انواع طلا
صندوقهای طلا دلار را ۲۰۲ هزار تومان قیمتگذاری میکنند!
⭕️ صفحه اختصاصی طلا و ارز اپ فاندبیس (اینجا) به شکل لحظهای دادههای مرتبط با بازار فیزیکی و صندوقها را پوشش میدهد.
درحالیکه صندوقهای نقره حوالی ۳ درصد رشد روزانه را تجربه کردند نقراط ۷٪ رشد را طی معاملات امروز ثبت کرده است.
⚠️ #نقراط در حال حاضر ۱۴٪ حباب دارد در حالیکه میانگین حباب صندوقهای نقره ۷٪ است!
⭕️ ورود نقدینگی حقیقی به صندوقهای طلا طی معاملات امروز از ۱۷۰۰ میلیارد فراتر رفت.
این در حالیست که حقیقی ها امروز بیش از ۳۵۰۰ میلیارد تا این لحظه خروج نقدینگی از صندوق های #درآمدثابت ثبت کردند.
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @Fundbase_Gold. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
صندوق طلای "عیار" از ابتدای اردیبهشتماه حباب قیمتی مثبت به خود گرفته و همیشه در این بازه زمانی تنها صندوق طلا با بیشترین حباب قیمتی مثبت بوده است. با این تفاسیر آیا شما در این چندماه و یا حال حاضر در این صندوق سرمایهگذاری میکنید؟
بله64%
خیر36%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مرجع صندوقهای سرمایهگذاری @Fundbase_ir · 74,000 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Hamed Kiani | حامد کیانی @hamed_kianiiii · 39,712 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
محسن تحلیل | Mohsen Tahlil @mohsen_tahlil · 37,555 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال رسمی آموزش مفید @mofidsecuritiesofficial · 79,308 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
گروه نوویرا | Novira Group @noviraco · 37,875 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
سیگنال و تحلیل سهام بورسکده @boursekadam · 49,814 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
جواد نصر | سلام بورس @salam_bourse · 37,053 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مرجع صندوقهای طلا” (@Fundbase_Gold), 39,266 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fundbase_Gold.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.