Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +443. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,718–22,348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 04:21
22,275
+5
16 Sept 2026, 16:00
22,270
+122
14 Sept 2026, 18:59
22,148
+7
13 Sept 2026, 05:59
22,141
+8
11 Sept 2026, 09:15
22,133
-11
8 Sept 2026, 13:19
22,144
+78
5 Sept 2026, 09:16
22,066
+25
3 Sept 2026, 14:00
22,041
+46
2 Sept 2026, 06:15
21,995
+113
1 Sept 2026, 09:25
21,882
-9
31 Aug 2026, 12:55
21,891
+5
30 Aug 2026, 10:19
21,886
-5
29 Aug 2026, 10:28
21,891
+3
28 Aug 2026, 12:42
21,888
-2
27 Aug 2026, 09:25
21,890
+47
26 Aug 2026, 07:16
21,843
+3
25 Aug 2026, 04:04
21,840
+6
23 Aug 2026, 23:35
21,834
+22
22 Aug 2026, 10:18
21,812
-3
20 Aug 2026, 22:02
21,815
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.6%
avg views ÷ 22,275 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,200
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
42
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
85 (18 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
406,477
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 13:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
✈️ نظر شما درباره دامنه نوسان بازار سهام چیست؟ این نظر سنجی برای هیات مدیره و رییس سازمان، وزیر اقتصاد و رییس کل بانک مرکزی ارسال خواهد شد.
دامنه 3% فعلی مناسب است12%
5%-10%38%
10%-15%5%
15-20%6%
دامنه پویا متناسب با عرضه و تقاضا مانند بورسهای دنیا42%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ بعد از این مطلب ، عده ای بیمار در کانالها و گروههای مختلف و نقدیون بورسی ، شروع به اظهار نظر کرده اند که فلانی چون ذینفع و مدیر نهاد مالی است این تحلیل را دارد، بدون شناخت از من یا با شناخت و از روی غرض که مطالب من هیچگاه در تمام این سالها در جهت نفع شخصی نبوده و صرفا انگیزه عمومی و راهنمایی مردم عادی را دارد.
📰 جهت آگاهی این افراد و شاید برخی خوانندگان، یک شرکت کارگزاری مانند سبدگردان یا سایر نهادهای مالی نیست که…
این دو هفته بعد از دورهای سکوت
زیاد نوشتم
برخی دعوت به برنامه و مصاحبهها را رفتم
و
سعی کردم با تحلیلهای کلی هموطنان تحت انواع فشار را راهنمایی کنم.
حرف جدیدی نیست
تحلیلها شده
پیشبینیها هم نوشته شده
مدتی نخواهم بود تا تحقق همه اینها و اتفاقات آتی که تا آخر امسال منتظرشان هستم، سپس مجددا صحبت خواهیم کرد.
اقتصاد کشور روی اتوپایلوت و رها شده است!
با این فرمان تا چند روز دیگر حداقل حقوق ماهانه کارگر به ۱۰۰ #دلار خواهد رسید.
حمایت کالایی مستقیم دولت از تمامی دهکها جز صدک اول ضروری است.
قرار بود با حذف ارز ترجیحی در دیماه دلار ارزان شود و رانت از گیرنده ارز با کالا برگ به مردم مستقیم منتقل شود.
سایر تحلیلهای نظریهپردازان اصلاحات اقتصادی این دولت مانند #بنزین همینقدر «….. خیاری» است.
📰علی بندری در پادکست BPlus یک اپیزود داده اخیرا در خصوص تنگه باب المندب، یک نکته جالب داره که ایران از پانزده قرن پیش هر زمان توانسته برای امنیت خودش سعی کرده بر یمن تسلط پیدا کنه و یمنی ها عربهایی هستند که ریشه ایرانی دارند. توصیه میکنم در یوتیوب ببینید.
"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی" pinned «✅ این هم برای ثبت در تاریخ بماند اینجا ، مثل سایر تحلیلهایی که برای بسیار در ابتدا قابل باور نبود و بعد از دو سه سال محقق شدند.»
📰نسبت بسیاری از سهام بنیادی بازار مانند گل گهر و چادرملو به دلار در محدوده سال 1384 است ، یعنی اگر کسی هولدر این شرکتها بوده نسبت به سال 84 هیچ سود دلاری نکرده است.
"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی" pinned «📰 نسبت شاخص بورس به دلار در عدد آبان 1402 است و این نسبت ، در مقایسه با خرداد 1405 کلا 40% رشد کرده است. به عبارتی ، 40% رشد واقعی شاخص کل بورس طی این مدت بوده که البته صرفا در گروهها و نمادهای بسیار کمی رخ داده است این عدد. ✅ بر اساس نسبت سال 99 ، امروز…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @m_robatii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
✈️ نظر شما درباره دامنه نوسان بازار سهام چیست؟ این نظر سنجی برای هیات مدیره و رییس سازمان، وزیر اقتصاد و رییس کل بانک مرکزی ارسال خواهد شد.
دامنه 3% فعلی مناسب است12%
5%-10%38%
10%-15%5%
15-20%6%
دامنه پویا متناسب با عرضه و تقاضا مانند بورسهای دنیا42%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مهدی میرزایی (انستیتو امواج الیوت) @mahdy_mirzaiie · 27,362 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Capital DNA @Capital_DNA · 27,300 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
توپولی @topoli · 29,983 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
گنگ خواب دیده @mortezaebad · 50,700 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
سید مهدی طباطبایی / حجم سبز @hajme_sabzzz · 37,495 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
مرجع صندوقهای طلا @Fundbase_Gold · 39,070 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
سالار صفائی @salarsafaie · 46,017 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Renani Mohsen / محسن رنانی @Renani_Mohsen · 68,374 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
بورس ایران با دکتر وحید کشمیری پور @vahidkeshmirypour · 25,879 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Behnam Samadi | بهنام صمدی @BehnamSamadi_ir · 59,801 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
فردانامه _حسن کاظمزاده @fardaname · 24,443 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
مجید مؤیدی -شاخص سبز- @shakhesesabz · 32,256 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
تحلیل کاربردی " هلالات " @validhelalat · 67,555 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
سینا رهبرشهلان @sinarahbarshahlan · 25,861 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
آرشیو چارت @archivecharts · 24,073 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
آرش مهراز - صندوق @InvestmentMind · 25,086 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
شناسایی تحرکات @Identify_Movements · 35,719 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
پارسیس تحلیل @parsistahlil · 50,306 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
فاند پلاس @fundplus1 · 28,028 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
فردین سلطانی (محافظ) @boursivared · 1,959 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
مرجع صندوقهای سرمایهگذاری @Fundbase_ir · 73,690 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
آوای آگاه @AgahMoshaver · 46,713 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
سیامک قاسمی @siamak_ghassemi · 99,439 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
مرکز تحلیل بنیادی @tahlil_center · 23,050 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 73 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی"” (@m_robatii), 22,275 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m_robatii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.